Palmieri v. Florida, 393 U.S. 218 (1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Palmieri v. Florida, 393 U.S. 218 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Los Angeles County Pioneer Society v. Historical Society (cal, 1953-05-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Los Angeles County Pioneer Society v. Historical Society (2×)
Cal. · 1953 · confidence medium
Decisions holding that gifts to charities revert to the donors upon dissolution have been subjected to severe criticism (see Simes, The Law of Future Interests, § 185; Gray, The Rule Against Perpetuities [4th ed.], § 51.1; Turrentine, Suggestions for Revision of Provisions of the California Civil Code Regarding Future Interests, 21 Cal.L.Rev. 1, 14), and other states reach a contrary result. ( In re Centennial & Memorial Assn. of Valley Forge, supra, 235 Pa. 206, 213 ; McAlhany v. Murray, 89 S.C. 440, 446 [ 71 S.E. 1025 ]; see, also, Wilson v. Leary, 120 N.C. 90, 94 [ 26 S.E. 630 , 50 Am.St.…
examined Cited "see" Ellison v. State (3×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Palmieri v. State, 198 So.2d 633 (Fla.1967), cert. dism. 393 U.S. 218 , 89 S.Ct. 440 , 21 L.Ed.2d 389 (1968), reh. den. 393 U.S. 1045 , 89 S.Ct. 611 , 21 L.Ed.2d 596 (1968).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. MacKey
E.D.N.Y · 1975 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Courtney v. United States, 390 F.2d 521, 527 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 857 , 89 S.Ct. 98 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 126 , rehearing denied, 393 U.S. 992 , 89 S.Ct. 440 , 21 L.Ed.2d 457 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Palmieri
v.
Florida
131.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1968.
393 U.S. 218
Phillip Goldman, by appointment of the Court, 392 U. S. 920, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner., Howard Mendelow, Assistant Attorney General of Florida, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Earl Faircloth, Attorney General, and Edward Cowart, Assistant Attorney General.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The petitioner was convicted of robbery in the Criminal Court of Dade County, Florida, and the judgment of conviction was affirmed by the District Court of Appeal, 189 So. 2d 512, and the Supreme Court of Florida, 198 So. 2d 633. We granted certiorari because the case appeared to present a substantial constitutional question concerning the admissibility at trial of “lineup” identifications made after the petitioner was arrested without probable cause for the sole purpose of gathering evidence against him. 391 U. S. 934. However, upon the complete review of the record that has now become possible, and in the light of oral argument by able and conscientious counsel, it has become evident that the legality of the petitioner’s arrest was not at issue in the Florida appellate courts, and is not challenged here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.