green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See Pollard v. Roberts, 283 F.Supp. 248, 255 (E.D.Ark.), aff'd, 393 U.S. 14 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968); In re Criminal Investigation, 754 P.2d 633, 642 (Utah 1988); State v. *837 Kelley, 353 N.W.2d 845, 847 (Iowa 1984); cf. People v. Wilson, 164 Ill.2d 436 , 207 Ill.Dec. 417, 428 , 647 N.E.2d 910, 921 (1994); State v. Baldwin, 242 Mont. 176 , 789 P.2d 1215, 1219 (1990); State ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Humphreys, Hutcheson & Moseley v. Donovan
See Pollard v. Roberts, 283 F.Supp. 248, 257 (E.D.Ark.) (three-judge court), aff’d, 393 U.S. 14 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
Marshall v. J. P. Stevens Employees Education Committee
See Pollard v. Roberts, 283 F.Supp. 248 (3-Judge court, E.D.Ark.1968), aff’d per curiam, 393 U.S. 14 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerald Hastings v. North East Independent School District
See Pollard v. Roberts, 283 F.Supp. 248, 257 (ED Ark.) (three-judge court), aff'd., 393 U.S. 14 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968). 30 424 U.S. at 64 , 96 S.Ct. at 656 . 31 Where, as here, constitutionally protected rights are infringed by the disclosure order, the party seeking discovery must demonstrate "an interest in obtaining the disclosures . . . which is sufficient to justify the deterrent effect which . . . these disclosures may well have," N. A. A. C.
cited
Cited "see"
Hastings v. North East Independent School District
See Pollard v. Roberts, 283 F.Supp. 248, 257 (ED Ark.) (three-judge court), aff’d., 393 U.S. 14 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968). 424 U.S. at 64 , 96 S.Ct. at 656 .
cited
Cited "see"
Oregon Socialist Workers 1974 Campaign Committee v. Paulus
See Pollard v. Roberts, 283 F.Supp. 248 (3-judge court, E.D.Ark.1968), aff’d per curiam, 393 U.S. 14 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1975 PA 227
See Pollard v Roberts, 283 F Supp 248, 257 (ED Ark, 1968) (three-judge court), aff'd, 393 US 14 [ 89 S Ct 47 ; 21 L Ed 2d 14 ] (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Buckley v. Valeo
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See id. § 431(e)(5)(A) 120 In Pollard v. Roberts, 283 F.Supp. 248 (E.D.Ark.), aff'd, 393 U.S. 14 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968) (mem.), a three-judge district court, which included then Circuit Judge Blackmun, saw no compelling state interest to justify a particularized inquiry by a prosecutor into the identity of contributors to the Republican Party in Arkansas, referred to as a long-time minority party, "a minority party as far as numbers of regular adherents are concerned." Id. at 258.
cited
Cited "see"
Lee v. Boswell
See Hornbeak v. Hamm, 283 F.Supp. 549 (M.D.Ala.), aff’d per curiam, 393 U.S. 9 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968). .
cited
Cited "see"
Bruns v. Pomerleau
See Pollard v. Roberts, 283 F.Supp. 248 (E.D.Ark.), aff’d 393 U.S. 14 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Roberge v. Philbrook
See Hornbeak v. Hamm, 283 F.Supp. 549 (M.D.Ala.1968), aff'd per curiam, 393 U.S. 9 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 491, International Brotherhood of Police Officers v. Gwinnett County
In doing so, the Eleventh Circuit suggested that a “more lenient” showing applies to targeted investigations because “the government investigation itself may indicate the possibility of harassment.” Id.; see also Pollard v. Roberts, 283 F.Supp. 248, 258 (D.C.Ark.1968), aff'd per curiam 393 U.S. 14 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968) (finding prosecutor’s attempt to subpoena the names of contributors to a political campaign unconstitutional, despite “no evidence of record in this case that any individuals have as yet been subjected to reprisals on account of the contributions in qu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lassa v. Rongstad
See, e.g., International Action Ctr. v. United States, 207 F.R.D. 1 , 3 n. 6 (D.D.C.2002). [20] Much as in NAACP, the Court in Bates v. City of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516 , 80 S.Ct. 412 , 4 L.Ed.2d 480 (1960), spoke of "substantial uncontroverted evidence that public identification of persons in the community as members of the [NAACP] had been followed by harassment and threats of bodily harm." Id. at 524 , 80 S.Ct. 412 . [21] But cf. Britt v. Superior Court, 20 Cal.3d 844 , 143 Cal.Rptr. 695 , 574 P.2d 766, 782 (1978) (in which the majority of the court in a four-to-three decision seemingly ig…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brock v. Local 375, Plumbers International Union of America
See also Pollard v. Roberts, 283 F.Supp. 248, 257 (E.D.Ark.1968), aff'd, 393 U.S. 14 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brock v. Local 375, Plumbers International Union of America, Afl-Cio
See also Pollard v. Roberts, 283 F.Supp. 248, 257 (E.D.Ark.1968), aff'd, 393 U.S. 14 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Buckley v. Valeo
See also Pollard v. Roberts, 283 F.Supp. 248 (E.D.Ark.), aff'd mem. 393 U.S. 14 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ROBERTS, JUDGE, ET AL.
v.
POLLARD ET AL.
v.
POLLARD ET AL.
251.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1968.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 28 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS.
Joe Purcell, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Don Langston, Deputy Attorney General, for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.