Andersen v. Florida, 393 U.S. 22 (1968). · Go Syfert
Andersen v. Florida, 393 U.S. 22 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the administrative agency's own label is indicative but not dispositive; we do not classify a rule as interpretive just because the agency says it is.”
83 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Richard A. Batterton, Secretary of Employment & Social Services of the State of Maryland v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor (cadc, 1980-08-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Richard A. Batterton, Secretary of Employment & Social Services of the State of Maryland v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor
D.C. Cir. · 1980 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the administrative agency's own label is indicative but not dispositive; we do not classify a rule as interpretive just because the agency says it is.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Flores
E.D.N.Y · 1978 · confidence medium
The government says that the basis for the stop is found not in any single fact which is “perhaps innocent in itself” (Terry, 393 U.S. at 22, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1881 ) but in the following set of facts and circumstances “which *708 taken together warranted further investigation” (id.): 1.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Robert H. Hoard
7th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Place, 462 U.S. at 702 , 103 S.Ct. at 2642 (discussing Terry, 393 U.S. at 22, 88 S.Ct. at 1880 ); Wilson, 2 F.3d at 229 ; Johnson, 910 F.2d at 1508 .
discussed Cited "see" Stoddard Lumber Co. v. Marshall
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Motor Freight Traffic Ass’n v. United States, 268 F.Supp. 90 (D.D.C. 1967), aff’d 393 U.S. 18 , 89 S.Ct. 49 , 21 L.Ed.2d 19 (1968); Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Ass’n v. Finch, 307 F.Supp. 858 (D.Del. 1970); Davis, § 7:17.
discussed Cited "see" 8 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 2055, 1980 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 24,790 in the Matter of Establishment Inspection of Stoddard Lumber Company, Inc., 1/4 Mile South of City of Yellowstone Highway, St. Anthony, Idaho, Petitioner v. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, Respondent
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Motor Freight Traffic Ass'n v. United States, 268 F.Supp. 90 (D.D.C. 1967), aff'd 393 U.S. 18 , 89 S.Ct. 49 , 21 L.Ed.2d 19 (1968); Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Finch, 307 F.Supp. 858 (D.Del. 1970); Davis, § 7:17.
cited Cited "see" Laketon Asphalt Refining, Inc. v. United States Department of the Interior and Cecil Andrus, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
7th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nat’l Motor Freight Traffic Ass'n v. U. S., 268 F.Supp. 90 (D.D.C.1967), affd per curiam, 393 U.S. 18 , 89 S.Ct. 49 , 21 L.Ed.2d 19 (1968).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Retired Teachers Ass'n v. United States Postal Service
D.D.C. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
Thus, as a general rule, thirty days notice for solicitation of comments must precede all substantive, or leg,islative, rules and those interpretive rules which both constitute a change in prior agency position and have a “substantial impact on private rights and obligations.” 32 See 5 U.S.C. § 553 (b)(A); see also National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. United States, 268 F.Supp. 90 (D.D.C.1967) *148 (three-judge court), affirmed, 393 U.S. 18 , 89 S.Ct. 49 , 21 L.Ed.2d 19 (1968); Noel v. Chapman, 508 F.2d 1023 (2d Cir.) cert. den., 423 U.S. 824 , 96 S.Ct. 37 , 46 L.Ed.2d 40 (…
cited Cited "see, e.g." National Restaurant Ass'n v. Simon
D.D.C. · 1976 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, National Motor Freight Traffic Ass’n. v. United States, 268 F.Supp. 90 (D.D.C., 1967), aff’d per curiam 393 U.S. 18 , 89 S.Ct. 49 , 21 L.Ed.2d 19 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ANDERSEN
v.
FLORIDA
No. 335.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1968.
393 U.S. 22
William Y. Akerman for appellants.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)
Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.