green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Director of Internal Revenue
Prosecutorial domination: see United States v. Daneals, 370 F.Supp. 1289 (W.D.N.Y.1974): but see Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 323 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969); United States v. Mitchell, 397 F.Supp. 166, 172 (D.D.C.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Conway
See generally, Morris Flying Service v. Deming National Bank, 404 F.2d 856 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1020 , 89 S.Ct. 628 , 21 L.Ed.2d 565 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bridget M. Mandelbaum
See Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 322 (1st Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aristedes Drougas, United States of America v. Michael A. Karahalis, United States of America v. Arnold W. Ellis, Jr., United States of America v. Alfonso Defeo, United States of America v. Salvatore Alba
See Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 321 (1st Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Drougas
See Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 321 (1st Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Falcone
See, e.g., People v. Alicea, 37 N.Y.2d 601, 604 , 338 N.E.2d 625 (1975) (prosecutor made repeated attempts to introduce inadmissible evidence); see Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 322 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S. Ct. 633 , 21 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Moore
See Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 321 (1st Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Grand Jury Empanelled February 14, 1978. Appeal of United States of America
See United States v. Zakutansky, 401 F.2d 68, 72 (CA7 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1021 , 89 S.Ct. 628 , 21 L.Ed.2d 562 (1969); United States v. Lyons, 442 F.2d 1144 (CA1 1971). *866 The authorities cited by the Supreme Court explain the application of this principle.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cerilli
See Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314 , [C.A.1, 1968], cert. den. 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969); United States v. Corallo, 281 F.Supp. 24 (D.C.N.Y.1968).” (at page 493).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George H. Farnkoff, Jr.
See Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 322, n. 7 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clark
See Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314 (1st Cir., 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969); United States v. Corallo, 281 F.Supp. 24 (S.D.N.Y., 1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re the Estate of Hoffman
(2×)
See Morrison Flying Service v. Doming Nat’l Bank, 404 F. 2d 856 , 861 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. den. 393 U. S. 1020 , 89 S. Ct. 628 , 21 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation
See, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 5 v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 398 F.2d 248 (3rd Cir. 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1021 , 89 S. Ct. 628 , 21 L.Ed.2d 565 ; Marquez v. Omaha District Sales Office, 313 F. Supp. 1404 (D.C.Neb.1970); Nishiyama v. North American Rockwell Corp., 49 F.R.D. 288 (C.D.Cal.1970); Stebbins v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, 382 F.2d 267 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 390 U.S. 910 , 88 S.Ct. 836 , 19 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Payne v. Ford Motor Company
See, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc. v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 398 F.2d 248 (3rd Cir. 1968) cert denied 393 U.S. 1021 , 89 S.Ct. 628 , 21 L.Ed.2d 565 ; Marquez v. Omaha District Sales Office, 313 F.Supp. 1404 (D.C.Neb.1970); Nishiyama v. North American Rockwell Corp., 49 F.R.D. 288 (C.D.Cal.1970); Stebbins v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, 382 F.2d 267 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 390 U.S. 910 , 88 S.Ct. 836 , 19 L.Ed.2d 880 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard J. Cotter
See Patriarca v. United States, 1 Cir., 1968, 402 F.2d 314, 320-321 , cert. denied 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nimrod Solomon and George Sommer
(2×)
See Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 318 (1st Cir. 1968), certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 .
cited
Cited "see"
Nishiyama v. North American Rockwell Corp.
See, IBEW, Local Union No. 5 v. EEOC, 398 F.2d 248 (3rd Cir., 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1021 , 89 S.Ct. 628 , 21 L.Ed.2d 565 (1969); Vigil v. American Tel. & Tel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Merrell
United States v. Baldridge, 281 F.Supp. 470 (S.D.Tex.1968); Dorfman v. Rombs, 218 F.Supp. 905 (N.D.Ill.1963); see United States v. Zakutansky, 278 F.Supp. 682 (N.D.Ind.) aff’d 401 F.2d 68 (7th Cir. 1968) cert. denied 393 U.S. 1021 , 89 S.Ct. 628 , 21 L.Ed.2d 565 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick Perkins, United States of America v. Lois Perkins
See e.g., Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314 , 317 n. 2 (1st Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Hutchinson
See also, Morrison Flying Service v. Deming National Bank, 404 F.2d 856 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1020 , 89 S.Ct. 628 , 21 L.Ed.2d 565 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Travelers Indemnity Company
See e.g., Maganas v. Northroup, 135 Ariz. 573 , 663 P.2d 565, 567-68 (1983) (person found third party beneficiary where contract manifested intention to confer a direct benefit on him). 12 ASC argues that sufficient consideration for the release was given despite any preexisting duty it might have under the Propipe-ASC purchase order to make payments by joint check, relying principally on Morrison Flying Service v. Deming National Bank, 404 F.2d 856 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1020 , 89 S.Ct. 628 , 21 L.Ed.2d 565 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hart v. Hart (In Re Hart)
An “equitable lien” is the “right, not recognized at law, to have a fund or specific property, or its proceeds, applied to *960 the payment of a debt.” 6 Debtor-Creditor Law ¶ 26.02(C)(2) (Mathew Bender 1982); See also Morrison Flying Service v. Deming Nat’l Bank, 404 F.2d 856 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1020 , 89 S.Ct. 628 , 21 L.Ed.2d 565 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Malone v. Commissioner
Compare Commissioner v. Estate of Talbott, 403 F. 2d 851 , 855 (4th Cir. 1968) , revg. 48 T.C. 271 (1967) , cert. denied 393 U.S. 1022 (1969) ; Smith v. United States, 134 Ct. Cl. 136 , 139 F. Supp. 305 (1956) ; Pope v. United States, 296 F. Supp. 17 , 23 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marina VOUTSIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
See also Local 5, IBEW v. EEOC, 398 F.2d 248 , 249 (3rd Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1021 , 89 S.Ct. 628 , 21 L.Ed.2d 565 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pagano
v.
Martin
v.
Martin
No. 694.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1969.
Robert M. Harcourt and Philip J. Hirschkop for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, John C. Eldridge, and Walter H. Fleischer for respondents.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.