green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Tm Patents v. IBM
See Croll-Reynolds Co. v. Perini-Leavell-Jones-Vinell, 399 F.2d 913 (5th Cir.1968) (holding that the accused item was used by the government under an older version of § 1498 and that, therefore, the only remedy was a suit against the United States in the Court of Claims (now the Court of Federal Claims)), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1050 , 89 S.Ct. 688 , 21 L.Ed.2d 692 (1969); Bereslavsky v. Esso Standard Oil Co., 175 F.2d 148 (4th Cir.1949) (holding that, given the version of § 1498 then in place, the government’s authorization and consent to allegedly infringing manufacture formed a basis for…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kearns v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance
See Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc. v. Lea, 401 F.2d 650, 656 (3d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1050 , 89 S.Ct. 688 , 21 L.Ed.2d 692 (1969) (quoting Talley v. Hoffman, 18 Pa.D. & C.2d 725, 729 (1959)).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Swan
See City of Amarillo v. Eakens, 399 F.2d 541, 441 (5th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1051 , 89 S.Ct. 688 , 21 L.Ed.2d 692 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
El Tropicano, Inc. v. Garza (In Re El Tropicano, Inc.)
See City of Amarillo v. Eakens, 399 F.2d 541 (5th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1051 , 89 S.Ct. 688 , 21 L.Ed.2d 692 (1969). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Penn Central Transportation Co.
See Amarillo v. Eakens, 399 F.2d 541 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1051 , 89 S.Ct. 688 , 21 L.Ed.2d 692 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of San Francisco National Bank v. David M. Glickman
See Delta Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 398 F.2d 323, 324 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. den. 393 U.S. 1050 , 89 S.Ct. 688 , 21 L.Ed.2d 692 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Twin City Fire Insurance v. Philadelphia Life Insurance
See, e.g., Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc. v. LEA, 276 F.Supp. 132, 136 (E.D.Pa.1967), aff'd, 401 F.2d 650 (3rd Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1050 , 89 S.Ct. 688 , 21 L.Ed.2d 692 (1969); Russell v. Reliance Insurance Co., 672 S.W.2d 693, 694 (Mo.App.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., and Rask & Associates, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Rask & Associates, Third-Party v. John L. Griffith, Third-Party
See, e.g., Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc. v. LEA, 276 F.Supp. 132, 136 (E.D.Pa.1967), aff'd, 401 F.2d 650 (3rd Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1050 , 89 S.Ct. 688 , 21 L.Ed.2d 692 (1969); Russell v. Reliance Insurance Co., 672 S.W.2d 693, 694 (Mo.App.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Kemper Ins. Co. v. Yacomes
See e.g., Industrial Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. Dilks Agency, 751 F.2d 637 (3d Cir.1985) and Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc. v. Lea, 401 F.2d 650 (3d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1050 , 89 S.Ct. 688 , 21 L.Ed.2d 692 (1969). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sam ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
See, e.g., Delta Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 398 F.2d 323 (5th Cir. 1968) (fourteen year old case dormant for seven years), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1050 , 89 S.Ct. 688 , 21 L.Ed.2d 692 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Glekas v. Boss & Phelps, Inc.
See also Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc. v. Lea, 401 F.2d 650, 656 (3d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1050 , 89 S.Ct. 688 , 21 L.Ed.2d 692 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Delta Theatres, Inc.
v.
Paramount Pictures, Inc.
v.
Paramount Pictures, Inc.
No. 767.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 20, 1969.
C. Ellis Henican for petitioner., Harry McCall, Jr., and Ashton Phelps for respondents.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.