green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
MHM Sponsors Co. v. Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United Nations
See Ristuccia v. Adams, 406 F.2d 1257 (9th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 24 , 24 L.Ed.2d 3 . 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Aronov v. Secretary of Revenue
See Wheeler v. State, 127 Vt. 361 , 249 A. 2d 887 , appeal dismissed, 396 U.S. 4 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 4 (1969); McCutchan v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 191 Okla. 578 , 132 P. 2d 337 (1942).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ribelin Lowell & Co. Insurance Brokers of Alaska, Inc. v. Shipowners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (Luxembourg)
Id. at 1248 (“The right to remove a case from state to federal court is vested exclusively in the 'defendant or the defendants....'”) (emphasis added); see also Ristuccia v. Adams, 406 F.2d 1257, 1258 (9th Cir.1969), ce rt. denied, 396 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 24 , 24 L.Ed.2d 3 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stevens v. State Tax Assessor
(2×)
See Maxwell v. Bugbee, 250 U.S. 525, 538-43 , 40 S.Ct. 2, 5-7 , 63 L.Ed. 1124 (1919); see also Wheeler v. State, 127 Vt. 361 , 249 A.2d 887, 890-91 , appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 396 U.S. 4 , 90 S.Ct. 24 , 24 L.Ed.2d 4 (1969) (per cu-riam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kansas
(2×)
See also Wheeler v. State, 127 Yt. 361, 249 A.2d 887 (1969), appeal dismissed, 396 U.S. 4 , 90 S.Ct. 24 , 24 L.Ed.2d 4 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. State of Kansas
(2×)
See also Wheeler v. State, 127 Vt. 361 , 249 A.2d 887 (1969), appeal dismissed, 396 U.S. 4 , 90 S.Ct. 24 , 24 L.Ed.2d 4 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Conway
(2×)
See also, Wheeler v. State, 127 Vt. 361 , 249 A.2d 887 (1969) appeal dismissed 396 U.S. 4 , 90 S.Ct. 24 , 24 L.Ed.2d 4 , reh. denied (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JORDAN
v.
ARIZONA Ex Rel. NELSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL
v.
ARIZONA Ex Rel. NELSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL
204.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1969.
Stewart L. Udall for appellant., Gary K. Nelson, Attorney General of Arizona, appellee, pro se.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 16 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.