green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. Muetzel
See Zirinsky v. Sheehan, 413 F.2d 481, 485 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1059 , 90 S.Ct. 754 , 24 L.Ed.2d 753 (1969) (applying Minnesota law).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lorenz v. Logue
See, for example, Kirk v. Board of Regents of the University of California, 273 Cal.App.2d 430 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 260 (1969), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 396 U.S. 554 , 90 S.Ct. 754 , 24 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970). 3 That serious problems with respect to finance and deteriorating neighborhoods are endemic in municipalities throughout the country is common knowledge and certainly an appropriate area for legislative concern.
cited
Cited "see"
Hunter v. State
See United States v. Grayson, 416 F.2d 1073, 1077 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1059 , 90 S.Ct. 754 , 24 L.Ed.2d 753 (1970); McGrath v. United States, 402 F.2d 466 (7th Cir. 1968). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. L'Aquarius
See United States v. Grayson, 416 F.2d 1073 (CA5 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1059 , 90 S.Ct. 754 , 24 L.Ed.2d 753 , reh. denied, 397 U.S. 1003 , 90 S.Ct. 1114 , 25 L.Ed.2d 415 , reh. denied, 399 U.S. 917 , 90 S.Ct. 2191 , 26 L.Ed.2d 576 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Guy Arthur Cates, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Grayson, 416 F.2d 1073 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied 396 U.S. 1059 , 90 S.Ct. 754 , 24 L.Ed.2d 753 (1970); Marvel v. Zerbst, 83 F.2d 974, 977 (10th Cir.), aff’d 299 U.S. 518 , 57 S.Ct. 311 , 81 L.Ed. 382 (1936).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Grisham
See also United States v. Grayson, 416 F.2d 1073, 1076 (5th Cir.1969) (no right to be indicted in the division where the offense occurred), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1059 , 90 S.Ct. 754 , 24 L.Ed.2d 753 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weitzel v. State
See also Kirk v. Board of Regents, 273 Cal. App.2d 430 , 78 Cal. Rptr. 260 (1969), app. dismissed 396 U.S. 554 , 90 S.Ct. 754 , 24 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); Arizona Board of Regents v. Harper, 108 Ariz. 223 , 495 P.2d 453 (1972); Sturgis, et al. v. State of Washington, et al., 368 F. Supp. 38 , aff'd. 414 U.S. 1057 , 94 S.Ct. 563 , 38 L.Ed.2d 464 (1973)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
West v. Bowers
(2×)
Starns et al v. Malkerson et al, 326 F Supp 234 (DC Minn 1970), aff'd, 401 US 985 , 91 S Ct 1231 , 28 L Ed 2d 527 (1971); see also, Kirk v. Regents of University of California, 273 Cal App 2d 430, 78 Cal Rptr 260 (1969), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question 396 US 554 , 90 S Ct 754 , 24 L Ed 2d 747 (1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JOHNSON
v.
WASSERMAN, JUDGE
v.
WASSERMAN, JUDGE
No. 832.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 2, 1970.
Alvin A. Fein for appellants., John T. Corrigan and John L. Dowling for appellees.
Published
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.