Barash v. United States, 396 U.S. 832 (1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Barash v. United States, 396 U.S. 832 (1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
63 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. James Burke, Anthony Perla, Rocco Perla, and Richard Kuhn (ca2, 1983-01-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. James Burke, Anthony Perla, Rocco Perla, and Richard Kuhn
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
We have recognized that the district court may instruct the jury in an evenhanded, noncoercive manner that it would prefer a unanimous verdict if accomplished “without any juror yielding a conscientious conviction which he or she may have.” United States v. Rao, 394 F.2d at 355 ; see United States v. Barash, 412 F.2d 26, 32 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 832 , 90 S.Ct. 86 , 24 L.Ed.2d 82 (1969).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Aaron L. Stewart
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Barash, 412 F.2d 26, 31-32 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 832 , 90 S.Ct. 86 , 24 L.Ed.2d 82 (1969) (three-hour lapse between charge and verdict negates suggestion of coercion); United States v. Bowles, 428 F.2d 592, 596 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 928 , 91 S.Ct. 193 , 27 L.Ed.2d 188 (1970); United States v. Hynes, 424 F.2d 754, 757-58 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 933 , 90 S.Ct. 2270 , 26 L.Ed.2d 804 (1970).
cited Cited "see" United States v. David Bernard Barash
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See 90 S.Ct. 86 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Daniel Nelson Silva
4th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Barash, 365 F.2d 395, 402-03 (2d Cir.1966), cert, denied, 396 U.S. 832 , 90 S.Ct. 86 , 24 L.Ed.2d 82 (1969).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Menard v. State
Alaska · 1978 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Barash, 365 F.2d 395, 402-03 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 832 , 90 S.Ct. 86 , 24 L.Ed.2d 82 (1969); Imholte v. United States, 226 F.2d 585, 591 (8th Cir. 1955). 4 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Buffalo Courier-Express, Inc. v. Buffalo Evening News, Inc.
W.D.N.Y. · 1977 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, United States v. Erb, 543 F.2d 438 (2d Cir. 1976) and United States v. Barash, 365 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied 396 U.S. 832 , 90 S.Ct. 86 , 24 L.Ed.2d 82 (1969) with United States v. Griffith, 334 U.S. 100, 105 , 68 S.Ct. 941 , 92 L.Ed. 1236 (1948) and United States v. Patten, 226 U.S. 525, 543 , 33 S.Ct. 141, 145 , 57 L.Ed. 333 (1913), the last case holding that: “And that there is no allegation of a specific intent to restrain such trade or commerce does not make against this conclusion, for, as is shown by prior decisions of this court, the conspirators must be held to …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barash
v.
United States
No. 272.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1969.
396 U.S. 832
Louis Bender for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.