green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Williams
(2×)
But see United States v. Schipani, 414 F.2d 1262, 1266 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970); United States v. Paroutian, 299 F.2d 486, 489 (2d Cir. 1962) (rejecting as inadequate the Government’s claim that evidence “might” have been discovered independently).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Marotta
(2×)
But see United States v. Schipani, 289 F.Supp. 43 (E.D.N.Y.1968), aff'd. 414 F.2d 1262 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970), suggesting that in all suppression matters in federal courts the Government should be required to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that the evidence obtained by it was done so lawfully. .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Lee Cook and Jackie B. Kirk
stolen goods, wares and merchandise valued in excess of 5,000 which have travelled in interstate commerce, in particular men's suits, sports jackets, women's boots, leather coats
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Storment
See Younge v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 451 S.W.2d 346, 350 (Mo.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 910 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970); In re Sympson, 322 S.W.2d 808, 813 (Mo. banc 1959).
cited
Cited "see"
Humbert v. Benton
See Younge v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 451 S.W.2d 346, 349 (Mo.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 910 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Opinion No. (1989)
See Younge v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, 451 S.W.2d 346 , 349 (Mo. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 910 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970), reh. denied, 397 U.S. 1018 , 90 S.Ct. 1231 , 25 L.Ed.2d 433 (1970); In re Sympson, 322 S.W.2d 808 , 812 (Mo. banc 1959); Wasem v. Missouri Dental Board, 405 S.W.2d 492 , 497 (Mo.App., St.L. 1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Association For Better Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission
See First Report, 23 F.C.C. at 541 (1957) 20 In National Ass'n of Theatre Owners v. FCC, 420 F.2d 194 (D.C.Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 914 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970), we held that the "Act authorizes the Commission to license direct-charge broadcasting services." Id. at 202 (emphasis added; footnote omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Goff
See James v. United States, 416 F.2d 467, 473 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907 , 928, 90 S.Ct. 902 , 903, 938, 25 L.Ed.2d 87 , 108 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spencer v. State
See James v. United States, 416 F.2d 467 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 87 (1970) ("gambling paraphernalia" sufficient); Steele v. United States, 267 U.S. 498 , 45 S.Ct. 414 , 69 L.Ed. 757 (1925) (“cases of whiskey” sufficient during prohibition period); Gonzales, supra, ("drugs or dangerous drugs ... being unlawfully kept and possessed” sufficient); Cagle v. State, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 354 , 180 S.W.2d 928 (1944) (“implements used in ...
cited
Cited "see"
Community Communications Company, Inc. v. City of Boulder, Colorado
See National Assoc, of Theatre Owners v. FCC, 420 F.2d 194, 207 (D.C.Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 914 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. City of Minneapolis
See Goldwasser v. Brown, 417 F.2d 1169 (D.C.Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 918 , 25 L.Ed.2d 103 (1970); Atcherson v. Siebenmann, 605 F.2d 1058 (8th Cir. 1979); Cowell v. Fuller, 362 So.2d 124 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1978); Shipp v. Davis, 48 Ill.App.3d 463 , 6 Ill.Dec. 187 , 362 N.E.2d 822 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bright
See James v. United States, 416 F.2d 467, 473 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907 , 928, 90 S.Ct. 902 , 903, 938, 25 L.Ed.2d 87 , 108 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert A. Cortellesso
See, James v. United States, 416 F.2d 467, 473 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 87 (1970); United States v. Scharfman, supra; Spinelli v. United States, 382 F.2d 871 (8th Cir. 1967), rev’d on grounds, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969).
examined
Cited "see"
Cruse v. State
(4×)
See United States v. Schipani, 414 F.2d 1262, 1266 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970); Standard Oil Company v. State of Iowa, 408 F.2d 1171, 1177 (8th Cir.1969). [9] Moreover, there was no exploitation of the alleged misconduct to discover new evidence as prohibited by Wong Sun v. United States, supra .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph Ceccolini
(4×)
See United States v. Schipani, 414 F.2d 1262, 1266 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Alphonse Persico
(2×)
See United States v. Schipani, 289 F.Supp. 43, 47-53 (E.D.N.Y.1968), aff’d, 414 F.2d 1262 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Association Of Independent Television Producers And Distributors v. Federal Communications Commission
See National Association of Theatre Owners v. F.C.C., 136 U.S.App.D.C. 352 , 420 F.2d 194, 207-08 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 914 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970). 43 The Commission by this amendment of the rule is not ordering any program or even any type of program to be broadcast in access time.
cited
Cited "see"
National Ass'n of Independent Television Producers & Distributors v. Federal Communications Commission
See National Association of Theatre Owners v. F.C.C., 136 U.S.App.D.C. 352 , 420 F.2d 194, 207-08 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 914 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
The Network Project v. Federal Communications Commission
See generally National Association of Theatre Owners v. F.C.C., 136 U.S.App.D.C. 352 , 420 F.2d 194, 206 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 914 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Calvin Richardson
See James v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 416 F.2d 467, 475-476 , cert. denied 1970, 397 U.S. 907 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 87 ; cf. United States v. Steinkoenig, 5 Cir. 1973, 487 F.2d 225, 230 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Warren Thompson
See James v. United States, 416 F.2d 467, 473 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907 , 90 S. Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 87 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alfredo Garcilaso De La Vega
(2×)
See United States v. Schipani, 414 F.2d 1262 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970). 3 *764 Notwithstanding the foregoing proof appellant urges that since the illegal wiretaps have been rendered unavailable to him by their loss or destruction, suppression of evidence allegedly derived from them is mandated by our recent decision in United States v. Huss, 482 F.2d 38 (2d Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles James v. The Board of Education of Central District No. 1 of the Towns of Addison
See Goldwasser v. Brown, 417 F.2d 1169 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 918 , 25 L.Ed.2d 103 (1969) (Pickering test applies to teacher’s classroom speech at Air Force language school).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Howard v. Missouri State Board of Education
(2×)
See also Younge v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 451 S.W.2d 346, 349 (Mo.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 910 (1970) (reaffirming that physician license revocation law was for the protection of the public and not penal in nature).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shonubi
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Schipani, 293 F.Supp. 156 (E.D.N.Y.1968) (judge, at a bench trial, confirmed conclusions about susceptibility to coercion by observing and assessing demeanor), af f'd, 414 F.2d 1262 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salim
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Schipani, 293 F.Supp. 156, 163 (E.D.N.Y.1968), aff'd, 414 F.2d 1262 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970); Georgia Home Insurance Co. v. Campbell, 102 Ga. 106, 108 , 29 S.E. 148, 149 (1897).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Namen v. State
See also James v. United States, 416 F.2d 467, 473 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 87 (1970): When circumstances make an exact description of instrumentalities a virtual impossibility, the searching officer can only be expected to describe the generic class of items he is seeking.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Haring v. Blumenthal
See also Goldwasser v. Brown, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 222, 230 , 417 F.2d 1169, 1177 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 918 , 25 L.Ed.2d 103 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Allan Michael Klein
(2×)
See also James v. United States, 416 F.2d 467, 472-73 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 87 (1970); Nuckols v. United States, 69 App.D.C. 120, 122 , 99 F.2d 353, 355 (1938), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 626 , 59 S.Ct. 89 , 83 L.Ed. 401 (1938). 12 Perhaps more supportive of the government's position is the language in this court's decision in Vitali v. United States, 383 F.2d 121 (1st Cir. 1967), which was followed by the Second Circuit in United States v. Scharfman, 448 F.2d 1352 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 919 , 92 S.Ct. 944 , 30 L.Ed.2d 789 (1972).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Crews v. United States
(4×)
See, e. g., United States v. Schipani, 289 F.Supp. 43, 61-63 (E.D.N.Y.1968), aff'd, 414 F.2d 1262 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 102 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James R. Tygrett v. Walter E. Washington, Commissioner, District of Columbia
(2×)
Compare Goldwasser v. Brown, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 222 , 417 F.2d 1169 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 918 , 25 L.Ed.2d 103 (1970) * Senior Circuit Judge Bastian sat as a member of the court during deliberations on the petition for rehearing, but died before the court's order and supplemental opinion were prepared 1 Tygrett v. Washington, No. 72-1876 (D.C.Cir.1974), hereinafter cited "Op." 2 Senior Circuit Judge Bastian dissented from our holding.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brooks v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review
See also Goldwasser v. Brown, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 222 , 417 F.2d 1169 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 918 , 25 L.Ed.2d 103 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Louis B. Pacheco and John N. Fountain, Jr.
(2×)
See, e. g., James v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 416 F.2d 467 , 474, cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 87 (1970); Milam v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 322 F.2d 104, 110 , cert. denied, 377 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 1174 , 12 L.Ed.2d 181 (1964); United States v. Branan, 6 Cir., 1972, 457 F.2d 1062, 1066 . 11 The relationship between the two counts is quite apparent, and the evidence required to establish the substantive offense is included, to a large extent, in the evidence *561 necessary to establish the conspiracy count.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Anthony Romano and Stanley Yassen, United States of America v. Jack Riki Lynott
See also James v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 416 F.2d 467, 474 , cert. denied, 1970, 397 U.S. 907 , 90 S.Ct. 902 , 25 L.Ed.2d 87 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schipani
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 725.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1970.
Jacob P. Lejkovñtz and Abraham Glosser for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Joseph M. Howard, and John P. Burke for the United States.
Consideration, Took.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1) · Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.