green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Ginn-LA St. Lucie Ltd., LLLP
in many situations in which the same attorney acts for two or more parties having a common interest, neither party may exercise the privilege in a subsequent controversy with the other.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
King v. Conde
in federal question cases ... federal substantive rights may be compromised if a stringent state rule of evidence is applied.
cited
Cited "see"
Pgh History v. Ziegler, Appeal of: Ziegler
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Valente v. Pepsico, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 361 (D.Del.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Pgh History v. Ziegler, Appeal of: Hoffstot
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Valente v. Pepsico, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 361 (D.Del.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Found. v. Ziegler
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger , 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied , 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) ; Valente v. Pepsico, Inc. , 68 F.R.D. 361 (D.Del.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Pgh History v. Ziegler, Appeal of: Ziegler
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Valente v. Pepsico, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 361 (D.Del.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Refco Inc.
See generally Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1103-04 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) (holding that attorney-client privilege may be asserted by corporation against those for whom it acts as fiduciary, subject to right of such beneficiaries to show cause why it should not be invoked in the particular instance).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Perrigo Company
(2×)
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Fausek v. White, 965 F.2d 126 (6th Cir.) (extending Gamer beyond shareholder derivative suit), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Opus Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
See, Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1103-04 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); In re ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Braniff, Inc.
See, Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas A.J. Fausek v. Robert E. White, Selox, Inc.
See In Re Antitrust Grand Jury, 805 F.2d 155, 162 (6th Cir.1986) (“All reasons for the attorney-client privilege are completely eviscerated when a client consults an attorney not for advice on past misconduct, but for legal assistance in carrying out a contemplated or ongoing crime or fraud.”) It has been settled law since Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971), that a corporation may claim an attorney-client privilege to prevent an attorney from testifying about confidential communications with the corporati…
discussed
Cited "see"
In re LTV Securities Litigation
See, Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., 80 F.R.D. 718 (N.D.Ill.1978); Cohen v. Uniroyal, Inc., 80 F.R.D. 480 (E.D.Pa.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doyle v. Union Insurance
(2×)
See, Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F. 2d 1093 (5th Cir., 1970), cert. den. 401 U. S. 974 , 91 S. Ct. 1191 , 28 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
J. P. Foley & Co. v. Vanderbilt
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) ; Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1962) ; Fed.R.Evid. 501, Advisory Committee’s Note. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hayes v. Pennsylvania Lawn Products, Inc.
Co., 424 F.2d 1064 (3d Cir. 1970); see Eulo v. Deval Aerodynamics, Inc., 47 F.R.D. 35, 44 (E.D.Pa.1969), rev’d on other grounds, 430 F.2d 325 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); 5A J.
cited
Cited "see"
Baker v. F & F INVESTMENT
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Ruckelshaus
See Medical Committee for Human Rights v. SEC, 139 U.S.App.D.C. 226 , 232-239, 432 F.2d 659, 665-672 (1970), cert. granted, 401 U.S. -, 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 322 ; Trailways of New England, Inc. v. CAB, 412 F.2d 926 (1st Cir. 1969). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Samaritan Foundation v. Superior Court
See, e.g., Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1103-04 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) (finding that the privilege may be overcome by a showing of good cause in shareholder derivative suits); Aguinaga v. John Morrell & Co., 112 F.R.D. 671, 681 (D.C.Kan.1986) (holding that the privilege may be overcome by a showing of good cause in the effort by union members to discover communications between lawyers and officers who allegedly betrayed union); Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia v. Steamship Mount Dirfys, 537 F.Supp. 55, 56 (E.D.N.C.1981) (explai…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. Valley National Bank
See, e.g., Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1103 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Quintel Corp., N.V. v. Citibank, N.A., 567 F.Supp. 1357, 1364 (S.D.N.Y.1983); 2 Weinstein’s Evidence, supra, ¶ 503(d)(5)[01] at 503-74 to 75; Sup.Ct.Stan. 503(d)(5).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parts and Electric Motors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Sterling Electric, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Compare General Foam, 695 F.2d at 288 (reversing judgment n.o.v. but upholding determination that jury verdict “was against the clear weight of the evidence”) with Eulo v. Deval Aerodynamics, Inc., 430 F.2d 325 (3rd Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) (reversing district court’s decision to grant new trial for supposed errors in jury instructions).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Diasonics Securities Litigation
See also Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1103 (5th Cir.) (1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tony Davis BALLARD, Defendant-Appellant
See e.g., Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 , 1102 (5th Cir.1970), ce rt. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 680 F.2d 1026, 1028-29 (5th Cir.1982); In re Sealed Case, 754 F.2d 395, 399, 400 (D.C.Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Mallick v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
But cf. Flaherty v. Warehousemen, Garage & Service Station Employees' Local Union No. 334, 574 F.2d 484, 486 (9th Cir.1978) (per curiam) 33 See 5 Smith, Fletcher Cyclopedia of the Law of Private Corporations Sec. 2239.1 (perm. ed. 1976 & 1984 Supp.); see also supra note 21 34 Cf. Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1100-04 (5th Cir.1970) (listing factual inquiries relevant to "balancing of interests" in determining whether shareholder may inspect attorney-corporation correspondence), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,023, 8 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 475 Pauline Weil and Emanuel J. Weil, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Investment/indicators, Research and Management, Inc., Desmond W. Mitchell, Charles R. Schwab, Robert Birkie, John Hossfeld, Marjorie A. Wegner and Laurel Brook Farms, Inc.
See, e. g., Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 , 1097 & n.10 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); United States v. Bartone, 400 F.2d 459, 461 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1027 , 89 S.Ct. 631 , 21 L.Ed.2d 571 (1969); Radiant Burners, Inc. v. American Gas Ass'n, 320 F.2d 314, 322-23 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 929 , 84 S.Ct. 330 , 11 L.Ed.2d 262 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weil v. Investment/Indicators, Research & Management, Inc.
See, e. g., Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 , 1097 & n.10 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); United States v. Bartone, 400 F.2d 459, 461 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1027 , 89 S.Ct. 631 , 21 L.Ed.2d 571 (1969); Radiant Burners, Inc. v. American Gas Ass’n, 320 F.2d 314, 322-23 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 929 , 84 S.Ct. 330 , 11 L.Ed.2d 262 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garrity v. Thomson
See also Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1098-1100 (5th Cir. 1970), cert, denied, sub nom., Garner v. First American Life Insurance Company, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air Force
(2×)
See, e. g., Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 , 1096 n.7 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Schwimmer v. United States, 232 F.2d 855, 863 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 833 , 77 S.Ct. 48 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1956); 8 in 1 Pet Products, Inc. v. Swift & Co., 218 F.Supp. 253 (S.D.N.Y.1963); United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., supra; 8 Wigmore on Evidence § 2320 (McNaughton rev. 1961).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield Massachusetts v. Federal Power Commission, Boston Edison Company, Intervenor
See also Medical Committee for Human Rights v. S.E.C., 139 U.S.App.D.C. 226 , 432 F.2d 659 (1970), cert, granted, 401 U.S. 973 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 322 (1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Securities and Exchange Commission
v.
Medical Committee for Human Rights
v.
Medical Committee for Human Rights
No. 1162.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1971.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: S.D. Florida (1) · E.D. New York (1)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.