Sandoval v. California, 402 U.S. 909 (1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Sandoval v. California, 402 U.S. 909 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Robert E. Derecktor of Rhode Island, Inc. (rib, 1992-06-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In Re Robert E. Derecktor of Rhode Island, Inc.
Bankr. D.R.I. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Certain Space in Syracuse, New York, 320 F.Supp. 491, 496 (D.C.N.Y.1969), aff'd, 435 F.2d 872 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 908 , 91 S.Ct. 1381 , 28 L.Ed.2d 649 (1971); Mayo v. Pioneer Bank and Trust Co., 168 F.Supp. 503, 518 (W.D.La.1958).
discussed Cited "see" Ambassador Factors, Division Fleet Factors Corp. v. First American Bulk Carrier Corp. (In re Topgallant Lines, Inc.)
D. Ga. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Certain Space in Syracuse, New York, 320 F.Supp. 491, 496 (N.D.N.Y.1969), aff'd, 435 F.2d 872 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 908 , 91 S.Ct. 1381 , 28 L.Ed.2d 649 (1971); See also Mayo v. Pioneer Bank and Trust Co., 168 F.Supp. 503 at 518 (W.D.La.1958) (stating that the Act is “purely for the protection of the government”).
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Topgallant Lines, Inc.
Bankr. S.D. Ga. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Certain Space in Syracuse, New York, 320 F.Supp. 491, 496 (N.D.N.Y.1969), aff'd, 435 F.2d 872 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 908 , 91 S.Ct. 1381 , 28 L.Ed.2d 649 (1971); See also Mayo v. Pioneer Bank and Trust Co., 168 F.Supp. 503 at 518 (W.D.La.1958) (stating that the Act is "purely for the protection of the government").
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Buckalew v. Holloway
Alaska · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Marks v. State, 496 P.2d 66, 67 (Alaska 1972). [12] Despite the willingness of courts to define "term" as referring to a "fixed" period however, when specific holdings are scrutinized, few provide actual support for the proposition that "service at the pleasure of" is not a "term." See, e.g., Delahay v. State, 476 P.2d 908, 911 (Alaska 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 1381 , 28 L.Ed.2d 642 (1971); Collision v. State ex rel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sandoval
v.
California
No. 1418.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1971.
402 U.S. 909
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.