Carlson v. City of Tallahassee, 403 U.S. 910 (1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Carlson v. City of Tallahassee, 403 U.S. 910 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“because the officer was authorized to arrest ... there is no need to analyze whether ... a reasonable officer would have stopped solely for this violation.”
162 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 49 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Orozco (fladistctapp, 1992-10-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Orozco
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1992 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
because the officer was authorized to arrest ... there is no need to analyze whether ... a reasonable officer would have stopped solely for this violation.
cited Cited "see" Haggar International Corp. v. United Co. for Food Industry Corp.
E.D.N.Y · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss Jena, 433 F.2d 686, 703 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 905 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" DuVoisin v. Coker (In re Southern Industrial Banking Corp.)
Bankr. E.D. Tenn. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ransom v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971); Downie v. Pritchard, 309 F.2d 634 (8th Cir.1962); Continental Assurance Co. v. American Bankshares Corp., 483 F.Supp. 175 (E.D.Wis.1980).
cited Cited "see" Eastman Kodak Co. v. Rakow
W.D.N.Y. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss Jena, 433 F.2d 686, 704 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 905 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971). 3 .
cited Cited "see" Wagner v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb Inc.
N.D. Ill. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ransom v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513, 516 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" Alberti v. Klevenhagen
S.D. Tex. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
Newman v. Graddick, 740 F.2d at 1517, 1518 (11th Cir.1984); See Ranson v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513, 516 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971); FED.R.CIV.P. 25(d)(1).
discussed Cited "see" Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, a Corporation of Delaware v. Eco Chem, Inc., a Corporation of Minnesota, George G. Rynne, an Individual (2×)
Fed. Cir. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
The courts that have considered this problem have uniformly held “that if in personam jurisdiction has been previously acquired of the original party, then the in personam jurisdic tion continues over the substituted party.” Bertsch v. Canterbury, 18 F.R.D. 23, 27 (S.D.Cal.1955) (dictum); accord, Ransom v. Brennan, 46 F.R.D. 16 (S.D.Tex.1969), rev’d on other grounds, 437 F.2d 513 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" Fuji Photo Film Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Shinohara Shoji Kabushiki Kaisha and Graphic MacHinery International, Inc., Cross-Appellants
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
Luft Co. v. Zande Cosmetic Co., 142 F.2d 536, 539 (2d Cir.1944); accord, Carl Zeiss Stiftun v. VEB Carl Zeiss Jena, 433 F.2d 686 , 697 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 905 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971).
cited Cited "see" Plus Products v. Plus Discount Foods, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss Zena, 293 F.Supp. 892, 918 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff’d, 433 F.2d 686 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 905 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971).
cited Cited "see" Foxtrap, Inc. T/a Foxtrappe v. Foxtrap, Inc. T/a Foxtrappe
D.C. Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss Jena, 433 F.2d 686, 705 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 905 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971).
cited Cited "see" Coca-Cola Company v. Howard Johnson Company
N.D. Ga. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss Jena, 433 F.2d 686 , 704 (2nd Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 905 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bosurgi
S.D.N.Y. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ransom v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513, 518 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971) ; United States v. Marple Community Record, Inc., 335 F.Supp. 95, 101 (E.D.Pa.1971) ; cf. Stone v. Bank of Commerce, 174 U.S. 412, 421 , 19 S.Ct. 747 , 43 L.Ed. 1028 (1899). 5 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Hardin
Iowa · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Carlson v. City of Tallahassee, 240 So.2d 866 (Fla.App.1970), cert. denied, 244 So.2d 431 (Fla.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 910 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971) (Court upheld disturbing the peace conviction lodged against protester who refused to abide by rule that no signs were permitted inside municipal stadium reserved by political party to promote its own candidates, stating “one’s first amendment rights end where the same rights of another begin.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." John Pochiro and Karen Pochiro, Husband and Wife v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
Corp., 22 Ariz.App. 572 , 529 P.2d 726, 729 (1974) (same); see also Ransom v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513, 516-19 (5th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S. Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971); Schultz v. Schultz, 436 F.2d 635, 639-40 (7th Cir. 1971) (same). 5 Moreover, the Pochiros do not claim that Prudential otherwise received a copy of their complaint before December 2, 1984, which was the thirtieth day prior to the filing of the petition for removal.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Apple
D.S.C. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. Veb Carl Zeiss Gena, 433 F.2d 686 (2nd Cir. 1970) cert. denied, 403 U.S. 905 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971); Scarves by Vera, Inc. v. Todo Imports, Ltd., 192 U.S. P.Q. 289 (2nd Cir. 1976). (4) There has been no showing that the defendants profited from their infringement.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cuban Cigar Brands N. v. v. Upmann International, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1978 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Carl Zeiss, Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss, Jena, 433 F.2d 686, 704 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 905 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971); Tisch Hotels, Inc. v. Americana Inn, Inc., 350 F.2d 609, 614 (7th Cir. 1965); Standard Oil Co. of Colorado v. Standard Oil Co., 72 F.2d 524, 527 (10th Cir. 1934); Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Kasser Distillers Prods.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Miller Brothers Construction Company, Rapidways, Inc.
10th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Ransom v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. den’d, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 ; 3B Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 25.05 (2nd ed. 1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Joseph M. Joyner
D.C. Cir. · 1974 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Chaney v. State, 237 So.2d 281, 283 (Fla.App.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971) and Chippas v. State, 180 So.2d 355, 358 (Fla.App.1965), both citing Bell v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 254 F.2d 82 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 126 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 (1958).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Menendez v. Faber, Coe & Gregg, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1972 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss, Jena, 293 F.Supp. 892 (S.D.N.Y.1968), modified, 433 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 905 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carlson
v.
City of Tallahassee
No. 1584.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1971.
403 U.S. 910
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.