green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Sickich
See United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317 (5th Cir.1970), ce rt. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971)(defendant who chaEenged guilty pleas as not knowingly or intelligently made waived attomey-cHent privüege); Lewis v. State, 565 P.2d 846 , 850 n. 4 (Alaska 1977) (“Lewis waived the privilege with respect to his discussions with [counsel] by filing the motion which on its face put in issue what advice he did or did not receive from [counsel].”); State v. Pam, 31 Wash.App. 692, 695 , 644 P.2d 722, 723 (1982), rev’d an other grounds, 101 Wash.2d 507 , 680 P.2d 762…
cited
Cited "see"
Blizzard v. Watson
See Knuckles v. Prasse, 302 F.Supp. 1036 (E.D.Pa. 1969), aff'd, 435 F.2d 1255 (3d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 936 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 717 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,023, 8 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 475 Pauline Weil and Emanuel J. Weil, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Investment/indicators, Research and Management, Inc., Desmond W. Mitchell, Charles R. Schwab, Robert Birkie, John Hossfeld, Marjorie A. Wegner and Laurel Brook Farms, Inc.
Wigmore, supra, at 636; accord United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. 1970) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971); McCormick, supra, at 194. 21 Appellees contend that the Fund cannot be found to have waived its attorney-client privilege because it did not intend waiver when it made the disclosure.
discussed
Cited "see"
Odell Hargrow Hill v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.
See United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1328-29 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971). *206 In this case, Hill was informed of the potential sentence ranges under the new Penal Code.
cited
Cited "see"
Weil v. Investment/Indicators, Research & Management, Inc.
Wigmore, supra, at 636; accord United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. 1970) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971); McCormick, supra, at 194.
cited
Cited "see"
Imprisoned Citizens Union v. Shapp
See Knuckles v. Prasse, 302 F.Supp. 1036, 1048 (E.D.Pa.1969), aff’d, 435 F.2d 1255 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 936 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 717 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Jordan v. Arnold
See Knuckles v. Prasse, 302 F.Supp. 1036 (E.D.Pa.1969), Aff’d 435 F.2d 1255 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. den., 403 U.S. 936 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 717 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jihaad v. Carlson
See Knuckles v. Prasse, 302 F.Supp. 1036, 1059 (E.D.Pa.1969), aff’d, 435 F.2d 1255 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 936 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 717 (1971). (“[T]he prisoners are not entitled to a special dietary program.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Succession of Smith v. Kavanaugh, Pierson & Talley
See also United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971); State v. Aucoin, 362 So.2d 503, 505-6 (La.1978) (quoting 8 Wigmore, supra, § 2388 (3), at 855).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Burlington Northern, Inc., Burlington Northern Railroad Co., Union Pacific Corp., Union Pacific Railroad Co., Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc., Kansas City Southern Railway Co. & Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
See, e.g., United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324-26 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Burlington Northern, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324-26 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Continental Illinois Securities Litigation. Appeal of Continental Illinois Corp. & Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. Of Chicago
See e.g., United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971); United States v. Mierzwicki, 500 F.Supp. 1331, 1335 (D.Md.1980) 21 On our reading, very little of the Report strikes us as materially damaging to Continental.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Continental Illinois Securities Litigation
See e.g., United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971); United States v. Mierzwicki, 500 F.Supp. 1331, 1335 (D.Md.1980). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso Company
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. 1970) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George v. Parry
See, e. g., Smith v. Sampson, 349 F.Supp. 268 (D.N.H.1972), and Knuckles v. Prasse, 435 F.2d 1255 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 936 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 717 , reh. denied, 404 U.S. 877 , 92 S.Ct. 33 , 30 L.Ed.2d 125 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Newsome v. Sielaff
See, e. g., Wright v. McMann, 387 F.2d 519, 521, 525 (2d Cir. 1967) (allegations of solitary confinement in an inheated cell with open windows in winter encrusted with slime and human excrement without clothing or rudimentary hygienic supplies under threat of beatings would, if established, constitute cruel and unusual punishment.) Knuckles v. Prasse, 302 F.Supp. 1036, 1061-1062 (E.D.Pa.1969), aff’d, 435 F.2d 1255 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 936 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 717 (1971) (Confinement of two prisoners for 2y2 days in a cell 6' x 9' 11" with no window or light, a singl…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. McMann
See also Knuckles v. Prasse, 302 F.Supp. 1036 (E.D.Pa.1969), aff’d 435 F.2d 1255 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied 403 U.S. 936 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 717 (1971); Graham v. Willingham, 384 F.2d 367 (1967). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Freedman
v.
American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.
v.
American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.
No. 6792.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 1971.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.