Bell v. Patterson, 403 U.S. 955 (1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Bell v. Patterson, 403 U.S. 955 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
71 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. DeTella (ilnd, 1996-03-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. DeTella
N.D. Ill. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Speck, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208, 222 (1971), vacated in part on other grounds, 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bernard (2×)
N.C. · 1975 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Bell v. Patterson, 402 F.2d 394 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 955 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 865 (1971); State v. Conyers, 58 N.J. 123 , 275 A.2d 721 (1971).
cited Cited "see" State v. Monk
N.C. · 1975 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Bell v. Patterson, 402 F. 2d 394 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 955 , 29 L.Ed. 2d 865 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 (1971) ; State v. Conyers, 58 N.J. 123 , 275 A. 2d 721 (1971).
cited Cited "see" State v. Monk
unknown court · 1975 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Bell v. Patterson, 402 F.2d 394 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 955 , 29 L.Ed.2d 865 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 (1971); State v. Confers, 58 N.J. 123 , 275 A.2d 721 (1971).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lewis v. United States
D.C. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Clark v. Smith, 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 859 (1971), rev’g 224 Ga. 766 , 164 S.E.2d 790 (1968) (conviction summarily reversed where accused had been informed of all Miranda rights except the right to court-appointed lawyer in case of indigency); Moore v. United States, 457 A.2d 406, 409 (D.C.1983) (“anything less” than informing an accused of “the entire litany of \Miranda ] rights ... will render a subsequent statement inadmissible at trial during the government’s case-in-chief”). *1128 The government does not contest this principle.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bell v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Calley v. Callaway, 519 F.2d 184 (6th Cir. 1975) (en banc) (in the My Lai court-martial case, the Court of Appeals found the petitioner had not been deprived of a fair trial by prejudicial publicity); United States v. Haldeman, 181 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 559 F.2d 31 (1976) (en banc) (in a trial of one of the Watergate defendants, the Court of Appeals held that the trial court correctly refused requests for a change of venue or a continuance when the defendants failed to show any actual prejudice among the members of the jury); see also People v. Speck, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bell
v.
Patterson, Warden
No. 5017.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 1971.
403 U.S. 955
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.