green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Mickelson
(2×)
But see United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904, 910 (good cause requirement of federal discovery rule "is not satisfied by a mere conclusory allegation that the requested information is material to the preparation of the defense"), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 958 , 91 S.Ct. 357 , 27 L.Ed.2d 267 (1970).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Frank S. Cannone, United States of America v. Raymond D. Masciarelli and Lawrence Schultz
Crim.P. 7(f); but see United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904, 910 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 958 , 91 S.Ct. 357 , 27 L.Ed.2d 267 (1970) (expressly declaring that identity of government witnesses is not discoverable under Fed.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Abdi
See United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904, 911 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 958 , 91 S.Ct. 357 , 27 L.Ed.2d 267 (1970) (Brady holds only that suppression of evidence favorable to defendant at trial is denial of due process; it does not require government to determine prior to trial what evidence will be favorable to the accused) (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
Monts v. Lessenberry
See United States v. Mosely, 810 F.2d 93, 97 (6th Cir. 1987) (“ ‘The right to defend pro se and the right to counsel have been aptly described as ‘two faces of the same coin,’ in that waiver of one right constitutes a correlative assertion of the other.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904, 908 (6th Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 958 , 91 S.Ct. 357 , 27 L.E.d.2d 267 (1970)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Durden
See United States v. Mosely, 810 F.2d 93, 97 (6th Cir.1987) (“ ‘The right to defend pro se and the right to counsel have been aptly described as ‘two faces of the same coin,’ in that waiver of one right constitutes a correlative assertion of the other.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904, 908 (6th Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 958 , 91 S.Ct. 357 , 27 L.Ed.2d 267 (1970)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glen McCullah Willard Petrey, James Tankersley, and Ewell Scott
(2×)
See United States v. Dark, 597 F.2d 1097, 1099 (6th Cir.1979) (per curiam) (citing United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904, 910 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 958 , 91 S.Ct. 357 , 27 L.Ed.2d 267 (1970)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 927 , 100 S.Ct. 267 , 62 L.Ed.2d 183 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kearney
See United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904 (6th Cir.) cert. denied 400 U.S. 958 , 91 S.Ct. 357 , 27 L.Ed.2d 267 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Golon
See United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904, 910 (6 Cir. 1970), cert. denied 400 U.S. 958 , 91 S.Ct. 357 , 27 L.Ed.2d 267 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Deutsch
See United States v. Moore, 439 F.2d 1107, 1108 (6th Cir. 1971) (“Brady was never intended to create pretrial remedies.”) United States v. Condor, 423 F.2d 904, 911 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 958 , 91 S.Ct. 357 , 27 L.Ed.2d 267 (1970) ; United States v. Sklaroff, 323 F.Supp. 296, 310 (S.D.Fla.1971) ; United States v. Zirpolo, 288 F.Supp. 993, 1019 (D.N.J.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Larue King
See United States v. Peterson, 424 F.2d 1357 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 958 , 91 S.Ct. 357 , 27 L.Ed.2d 266 (1970); Daniels v. United States, 402 F.2d 30 (9th Cir. 1968); and United States v. Palmiotto, 347 F.2d 223 (2d Cir. 1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Talmon Hegwood, Jr.
See also United States v. Conder, 6 Cir., 1970, 423 F.2d 904, 909 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 958 , 91 S.Ct. 357 , 27 L.Ed.2d 267 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Strozier
v.
Smith, Warden
v.
Smith, Warden
No. 5514.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 14, 1970.
Published
Sup'. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied..