green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerardo Antonio Gomez, A/K/A Jerry Gomez, United States of America v. Mickey Crocker, United States of America v. Kelly Lynn Hanlon, A/K/A Leslie Ann Warren
See United States v. Insana, 423 F.2d 1165, 1168-69 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 83 , 27 L.Ed.2d 76 (1970). 37 Each of the defendants cross-examined Tucker extensively on a variety of subjects, including the status of his Rule 35 motion.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gomez
See United States v. Insana, 423 F.2d 1165, 1168-69 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 83 , 27 L.Ed.2d 76 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Ray Thompson
(2×)
See, United States v. Insana, 423 F.2d 1165 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 83 , 27 L.Ed.2d 76 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Altrui
See United States v. Insana, 423 F.2d 1165, 1170 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S. Ct. 83 , 27 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald A. Rado v. State of Connecticut
See United States v. Insana, 423 F.2d 1165, 1168 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 83 , 27 L.Ed.2d 76 (1970); Wade v. Yeager, 415 F.2d 570 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 974 , 90 S.Ct. 466 , 24 L.Ed.2d 443 (1969); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wilson
See United States v. Insana, 423 F.2d 1165 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S. Ct. 83 , 27 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest Infelice and Mario Garelli
See United States v. Insana, 423 F.2d 1165, 1168 (2nd Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 83 , 27 L.Ed.2d 76 ; California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149, 188-189 , 90 S.Ct. 1930 , 26 L.Ed.2d 489 (1970) (concurring opinion of Justice Harlan).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wade
Ed. 2d 794 (1970); see United States v. Insana, 423 F. 2d 1165 (2 Cir.), cert. den. 400 U. S. 841 , 91 S. Ct. 83 , 27 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wade
Contra, Wade, supra; Baker v. Wainwright, 422 F. 2d 145 (5 Cir.), cert. den. 399 U.S. 927 , 90 S.Ct. 2243 , 26 L.Ed. 2d 794 (1970); see United States v. Insana, 423 F. 2d 1165 (2 Cir.), cert. den. 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 83 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 76 (1970); cf. United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Geraci v. Senkowski
See also United States v. Insana, 423 F.2d 1165, 1168 (2d Cir.1970) (“[N]or does the failure of the defendant to cross-examine because he believes such examination would be fruitless render the witness unavailable for such examination.”), cer t. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 83 , 27 L.Ed.2d 76 (1970). 20 In sum, I conclude that the prosecution did not have to show the unavailability of Terra-nova before presenting his grand jury testimony.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stephen B. Zackson and Henry Acierno, Peter Lagatta
See, e.g., United States v. Insana, 423 F.2d 1165, 1170 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 83 , 27 L.Ed.2d 76 (1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Yarbrough
Id.; see also United States v. Insana, 423 F.2d 1165, 1169 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 83 , 27 L.Ed.2d 76 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Yarbrough
Id.; see also United States v. Insana, 423 F.2d 1165, 1169 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 83 , 27 L.Ed.2d 76 (1970). 118 In the instant case, the jury was thoroughly informed of the nature of the plea agreement.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Van Hatten v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Insana, 423 F.2d 1165, 1169-70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 83 , 27 L.Ed.2d 76 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Chavez
(People v. Martinez (1972) 71 Ill.App.3d 1075 [ 289 N.E.2d 76, 78 ]; see also United States v. Rodriguez (4th Cir. 1970) 424 F.2d 205 , cert. den. 400 U.S. 841 [ 27 L.Ed.2d 76 , 91 S.Ct. 83 ].) The Arizona Supreme Court has held, however, that the right to an interpreter—as such—is effectively denied if the attorney is required to act as interpreter and defense counsel at the same time.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Burciago
(See People v. Green, supra, at p. 990; see also United States v. Insana (2d Cir. 1970) 423 F.2d 1165 , cert. den. 400 U.S. 841 [ 27 L.Ed.2d 76 , 91 S.Ct. 83 ].) The third aspect of the confrontation requirement was clearly met in this case; the ability to observe Purdy’s demeanor was fully provided the trier of fact.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph Ferrell v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
See also United States v. Rodriguez, 424 F.2d 205 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 83 , 27 L.Ed.2d 76 (1970) (use of interpreter within sound discretion of trial court); Suarez v. United States, 309 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1962) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reed
v.
Kirk, Governor of Florida
v.
Kirk, Governor of Florida
No. 5306.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1970.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. ’