Nat'l Screen Serv. Corp. v. Poster Exch., Inc., 401 U.S. 912 (1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Screen Serv. Corp. v. Poster Exch., Inc., 401 U.S. 912 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“. . . national screen intentionally used the monopoly power it had at the manufacturing level to eliminate poster as a competitor at the distributor-jobber level.”
59 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Consol. Gas Co. of Fla. v. City Gas Co. of Fla. (flsd, 1987-07-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Consol. Gas Co. of Fla. v. City Gas Co. of Fla.
S.D. Fla. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
national screen intentionally used the monopoly power it had at the manufacturing level to eliminate poster as a competitor at the distributor-jobber level.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Andrew Byars v. Bluff City News Company, Incorporated
6th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
. . . national screen intentionally used the monopoly power it had at the manufacturing level to eliminate poster as a competitor at the distributor-jobber level.
discussed Cited "see" Gweldon Lee Paschall and All Intervenors v. The Kansas City Star Company (2×)
8th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 431 F.2d 334, 338 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 912 , 91 S.Ct. 880 , 27 L.Ed.2d 811 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross
2d Cir. · 1979 · signal: accord · confidence high
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co., 273 U.S. 359, 375 , 47 S.Ct. 400 , 71 L.Ed. 684 (1927); accord, Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 431 F.2d 334, 339-40 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 912 , 91 S.Ct. 880 , 27 L.Ed.2d 811 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" John J. Terrell, Plaintiff-Appelle v. Household Goods Carriers' Bureau
5th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 334, 340 , cert, denied, 401 U.S. 912 , 91 S.Ct. 880 , 27 L.Ed.2d 811 ; Arthur Murray, Inc. v. Reserve Plan, Inc., 8 Cir. 1969, 406 F.2d 1138, 1149-1150 ; Dantzler v. Dictograph Products, Inc., 4 Cir. 1962, 309 F.2d 326, 330 ; Flintkote Co. v. Lysfjord, 9 Cir. 1957, 246 F.2d 368 ; Momand v. Universal Film Exchanges, 1 Cir. 1948, 172 F.2d 37, 42-44 . 7 .
cited Cited "see" Kenneth J. Hampton, D/B/A Hampton Vending Supply v. Graff Vending Company
5th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 334 , cert. denied, 1971, 401 U.S. 912 , 91 S.Ct. 880 , 27 L.Ed.2d 811 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Screen Service Corp.
v.
Poster Exchange, Inc.
No. 1001.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1971.
401 U.S. 912
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 76%
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1) · S.D. Florida (1)

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.