green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Grove
See Commonwealth v. Lewis, 443 Pa. 305 , 279 A.2d 26, 29 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1003 , 92 S.Ct. 571 , 30 L.Ed.2d 556 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James C. Gordon
See United States v. Bray, 445 F.2d 178 , 182 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1002 , 92 S.Ct. 571 , 30 L.Ed.2d 555 (1971); Beaudine v. United States, 368 F.2d 417, 421 (5th Cir.1966); See also United States v. Tumblin, 551 F.2d 1001 (5th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cleveland Tumblin
Accord, United States v. Bray, 445 F.2d 178 , 182 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1002 , 92 S.Ct. 571 , 30 L.Ed.2d 555 (the cross-examiner should limit his questions concerning prior crimes to the number of prior convictions, the nature of each of the crimes charged, and the date and time of each conviction).
discussed
Cited "see"
University Computing Company v. Lykes-Youngstown Corporation
See generally 2 Callmann, Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, 52.1 (3d Cr. 1968) 26 See e.g., Precision Plating v. Martin Marietta, 435 F.2d 1262 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1002 , 92 S.Ct. 571 , 30 L.Ed.2d 556 (1971) where public disclosure of a process was held to constitute a complete destruction of the value of the trade secret 27 Defendants disclosed the complete system to one Hugh Cort of Technical Resources, Inc., unaware that Cort had been retained by UCC to discover whether LYCSC had in fact stolen the AIMES system.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marricone v. United States
See e.g., Stokes v. United States, 444 F.2d 69 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1002 , 92 S.Ct. 571 , 30 L.Ed.2d 555 (1971); Young v. United States, 372 F.Supp. 736 (S.D.Ga.1974); DeGroot v. United States, 384 F.Supp. 1178 (N.D.Iowa 1974); Locke v. United States, 351 F.Supp. 185 (D.Hawaii 1972). *879 IV.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Thomas
See also United States v. Bray, 445 F.2d 178 , 181 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1002 , 92 S.Ct. 571 , 30 L.Ed.2d 555 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dyer v. Merry Shipping Co.
See, e. g., Precision Plating & Metal Finishing, Inc. v. Martin-Marietta Corp., 435 F.2d 1262 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1002 , 92 S.Ct. 571 , 30 L.Ed.2d 556 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp.
See, e.g., Precision Plating v. Martin Marietta, 435 F.2d 1262 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1002 , 92 S.Ct. 571 , 30 L.Ed.2d 556 (1971) where public disclosure of a process was held to constitute a complete destruction of the value of the trade secret. .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCaine
v.
Swenson, Warden
v.
Swenson, Warden
No. 71-5393.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 20, 1971.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.