green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.9 score
“what conduct constitutes a 'purge' depends upon the nature and extent of the misuse. where the misuse consists of the insertion of an objectionable provision in a contract, the patentee's cancellation and abandonment of the clause may be sufficient.”
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Altmayer-Pizzorno v. L-Soft International, Inc.
what conduct constitutes a 'purge' depends upon the nature and extent of the misuse. where the misuse consists of the insertion of an objectionable provision in a contract, the patentee's cancellation and abandonment of the clause may be sufficient.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kopituk
See United States v. Cramer, 447 F.2d 210, 219 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1024 , 92 S.Ct. 680 , 30 L.Ed.2d 674 (1972); United States v. Maius, 378 F.2d 716, 718 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 216 , 19 L.Ed.2d 219 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kopituk
See United States v. Cramer, 447 F.2d 210, 219 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1024 , 92 S.Ct. 680 , 30 L.Ed.2d 674 (1972); United States v. Maius, 378 F.2d 716, 718 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 216 , 19 L.Ed.2d 219 (1967). 262 Those records fraudulently designated amounts used to pay off union officials as expenses for "commissions," "repairs" and other items.
discussed
Cited "see"
Leonard Kahn v. Dynamics Corporation of America
See Ansul Company v. Uniroyal, Inc., 301 F.Supp. 273, at 280 (S.D.N.Y.1969), aff’d in relevant part, 448 F.2d 872 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1018 , 92 S.Ct. 680 , 30 L.Ed.2d 666 (1972); cf. Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 18 , 86 S.Ct. 684 , 15 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.
See Ansul Company v. Uniroyal, Inc., 306 F.Supp. 541, 560 (S.D.N.Y.1969), modified, 448 F.2d 872 (2 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1018 , 92 S.Ct. 680 , 30 L.Ed.2d 666 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fred B. Black, Jr., (Two Cases)
See United States v. Meriwether, 486 F.2d 498, 505 (5th Cir.1973) (failure to include figures for net worth or cash on hand at beginning of taxable years cannot prejudice defendant in a specific items case), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 948 , 94 S.Ct. 3074 , 41 L.Ed.2d 668 (1974); see also United States v. Cramer, 447 F.2d 210, 218 (2d Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1024 , 92 S.Ct. 680 , 30 L.Ed.2d 674 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sulmeyer v. Seven-Up Co.
See also Rex Chainbelt, Inc. v. Harco Products, Inc., 512 F.2d 993 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 831 , 96 S.Ct. 52 , 46 L.Ed.2d 49 , 44 U.S.L.W. 3201 (1975) and Ansul Co. v. Uniroyal, Inc., 448 F.2d 872 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1018 , 92 S.Ct. 680 , 30 L.Ed.2d 666 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,517 United States of America v. Philip Zane, and Morton S. Kaplan
See also United States v. Cramer, 447 F.2d 210, 219 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U. S. 1024 , 92 S.Ct. 680 , 30 L.Ed.2d 674 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Von Zamft
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 71-543.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1972.
Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.