green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Daniel Robert Ryan v. Ohio Edison Company
But see United States v. Edwards, 458 F.2d 875, 880 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 (“Statutes like the federal mail fraud statute involved here must be strictly construed in order to avoid extension beyond the limits intended by Congress”). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Walter N. HUNTER, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of SHIPSHEWANA STATE BANK
See Harris v. Manufacturers Nat'l Bank, 457 F.2d 631, 635-36 (6th Cir.) (holding that discharge, under old Bankruptcy Act, precluded "quasi in rem” suit against entireties property), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 885 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 142 (1972); cf. Rush v. Savchuk, 444 U.S. 320 , 100 S.Ct. 571 , 62 L.Ed.2d 516 (1980) (quasi in rem suit to obtain insurance proceeds is suit against the insured and requires the plaintiff to meet in personam jurisdictional standards); Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 , 207 n. 22, 97 S.Ct. 2569 , 2581 n. 22, 53 L.Ed.2d 683 (1977) ("All proceedings ... are re…
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Oberlies
See Harris v. Manufacturers National Bank, 457 F.2d 631 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 885 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 142 (1972). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert W. Coachman. Appeal of Wendell Hill (Material Witness). United States of America v. Albert W. Coachman. Appeal of Gary Ballard (Material Witness)
Accord, Baker v. Eisenstadt, 456 F.2d 382, 390 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 87 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Coachman
Accord, Baker v. Eisenstadt, 456 F.2d 382, 390 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 87 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. DeLong
(2×)
Gendron v. Burnham, 146 Me. 387, 398 , 82 A.2d 773, 781 (1951); see Baker v. Eisenstadt, 456 F.2d 382, 388 (1st Cir.) (refusal to answer questions in "actual presence" of court is criminal contempt and may be punished summarily), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 87 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sumy v. Schlossberg
See, e.g., Harris v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, 457 F.2d 631 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 885 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 142 (1972); Fetter v. United States, 269 F.2d 467 (6 Cir.1959); In re Shaw, 5 B.R. 107, 111 (Bankr.M.D.Tenn.1980); Ades v. Caplan, 132 Md. 66 , 103 A. 94 (1918).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Sumy
See, e.g., Harris v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, 457 F.2d 631 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 885 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 142 (1972); Fetter v. United States, 269 F.2d 467 (6 Cir.1959); In re Shaw, 5 B.R. 107, 111 (Bankr.M.D.Tenn.1980); Ades v. Caplan, 132 Md. 66 , 103 A. 94 (1918).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Ralph W. Brandstaetter and Mary L. Brandstaetter, Debtors. Appeal of Douglas F. Mann, Trustee
See also, Harris v. Manufacturers National Bank, 457 F.2d 631 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 885 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 142 (1972); Fetter v. United States, 269 F.2d 467 (6th Cir.1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mandel
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Edwards, 458 F.2d 875, 880 (5th Cir.1972) cert. den. 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 . *591 According to the majority in Mandel I , Based upon the indictment and the record in this case, the Appellants could have been convicted of mail fraud only if one or more of the following schemes to defraud were proven: a scheme involving the bribery or attempted bribery of Governor Mandel; or, a scheme involving the fraudulent misrepresentation of facts to, or such concealment of true facts from, the Maryland General Assembly and the Maryland Racing Commission fo…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mandel
See, e. g., United States v. Edwards, 458 F.2d 875, 880 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. den., 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marvin Mandel, United States of America v. W. Dale Hess, United States of America v. Harry W. Rodgers, Iii, United States of America v. William A. Rodgers, United States of America v. Irvin Kovens, United States of America v. Ernest N. Cory, Jr., United States of America v. W. Dale Hess, Harry W. Rodgers, Iii, and William A. Rodgers
See, e. g., United States v. Edwards, 458 F.2d 875, 880 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. den., 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Guthrie
v.
Alabama By-Products Co.
v.
Alabama By-Products Co.
No. 71-1672.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.