Guthrie v. Alabama By-Prods. Co., 409 U.S. 820 (1972). · Go Syfert
Guthrie v. Alabama By-Prods. Co., 409 U.S. 820 (1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
79 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In the Matter of Walter N. HUNTER, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of SHIPSHEWANA STATE BANK (ca7, 1992-07-28) · Strongest negative: Daniel Robert Ryan v. Ohio Edison Company (ca6, 1979-12-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Daniel Robert Ryan v. Ohio Edison Company
6th Cir. · 1979 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Edwards, 458 F.2d 875, 880 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 (“Statutes like the federal mail fraud statute involved here must be strictly construed in order to avoid extension beyond the limits intended by Congress”). 9 .
discussed Cited "see" In the Matter of Walter N. HUNTER, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of SHIPSHEWANA STATE BANK
7th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harris v. Manufacturers Nat'l Bank, 457 F.2d 631, 635-36 (6th Cir.) (holding that discharge, under old Bankruptcy Act, precluded "quasi in rem” suit against entireties property), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 885 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 142 (1972); cf. Rush v. Savchuk, 444 U.S. 320 , 100 S.Ct. 571 , 62 L.Ed.2d 516 (1980) (quasi in rem suit to obtain insurance proceeds is suit against the insured and requires the plaintiff to meet in personam jurisdictional standards); Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 , 207 n. 22, 97 S.Ct. 2569 , 2581 n. 22, 53 L.Ed.2d 683 (1977) ("All proceedings ... are re…
cited Cited "see" In Re Oberlies
Bankr. E.D. Mich. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harris v. Manufacturers National Bank, 457 F.2d 631 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 885 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 142 (1972). 7 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Albert W. Coachman. Appeal of Wendell Hill (Material Witness). United States of America v. Albert W. Coachman. Appeal of Gary Ballard (Material Witness)
D.C. Cir. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Baker v. Eisenstadt, 456 F.2d 382, 390 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 87 (1972).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Coachman
D.C. Cir. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Baker v. Eisenstadt, 456 F.2d 382, 390 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 87 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" State v. DeLong (2×)
Me. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
Gendron v. Burnham, 146 Me. 387, 398 , 82 A.2d 773, 781 (1951); see Baker v. Eisenstadt, 456 F.2d 382, 388 (1st Cir.) (refusal to answer questions in "actual presence" of court is criminal contempt and may be punished summarily), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 87 (1972).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sumy v. Schlossberg
4th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Harris v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, 457 F.2d 631 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 885 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 142 (1972); Fetter v. United States, 269 F.2d 467 (6 Cir.1959); In re Shaw, 5 B.R. 107, 111 (Bankr.M.D.Tenn.1980); Ades v. Caplan, 132 Md. 66 , 103 A. 94 (1918).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Sumy
4th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Harris v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, 457 F.2d 631 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 885 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 142 (1972); Fetter v. United States, 269 F.2d 467 (6 Cir.1959); In re Shaw, 5 B.R. 107, 111 (Bankr.M.D.Tenn.1980); Ades v. Caplan, 132 Md. 66 , 103 A. 94 (1918).
cited Cited "see, e.g." In the Matter of Ralph W. Brandstaetter and Mary L. Brandstaetter, Debtors. Appeal of Douglas F. Mann, Trustee
7th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Harris v. Manufacturers National Bank, 457 F.2d 631 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 885 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 142 (1972); Fetter v. United States, 269 F.2d 467 (6th Cir.1959).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mandel (2×)
Md. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Edwards, 458 F.2d 875, 880 (5th Cir.1972) cert. den. 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 . *591 According to the majority in Mandel I , Based upon the indictment and the record in this case, the Appellants could have been convicted of mail fraud only if one or more of the following schemes to defraud were proven: a scheme involving the bribery or attempted bribery of Governor Mandel; or, a scheme involving the fraudulent misrepresentation of facts to, or such concealment of true facts from, the Maryland General Assembly and the Maryland Racing Commission fo…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mandel
4th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Edwards, 458 F.2d 875, 880 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. den., 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Guthrie
v.
Alabama By-Products Co.
No. 71-1672.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
409 U.S. 820
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.