Eskridge v. United States, 409 U.S. 883 (1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Eskridge v. United States, 409 U.S. 883 (1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“appellant cannot circumvent the one year limitation by invoking the residual clause (6) of rule 60(b)”
99 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 34 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wagner Spray Tech Corp. v. Wolf (nysd, 1986-11-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Wagner Spray Tech Corp. v. Wolf
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
appellant cannot circumvent the one year limitation by invoking the residual clause (6) of rule 60(b)
discussed Cited "see" Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,479 Samuel Mallis and Franklyn B. Kupferman, Cross-Appellants v. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-Appellee (2×)
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wheatley v. Beetar, 637 F.2d 863 , 864 n. 1 (2d Cir.1980) ("[A]ppellate courts may consider an appeal of only the denial of a Rule 59 motion as harmless error and treat the appeal as being from the underlying judgment when such an appeal would be timely.") (quotingSerzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 461 F.2d 699, 701 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 883 , 93 S.Ct. 173 , 34 L.Ed.2d 139 (1972)).
discussed Cited "see" Rivers v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Bradley, 460 F.2d 529 (5th Cir.1972), cert. den., 409 U.S. 883 , 93 S.Ct. 171 , 34 L.Ed.2d 139 *106 (1972); Johnson v. State, 314 So.2d 248 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Tully v. State, 69 Fla. 662 , 68 So. 934 (1915).
cited Cited "see" M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. International Navigation Corporation Of Monrovia
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 461 F.2d 699, 702 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 883 , 93 S.Ct. 173 , 34 L.Ed.2d 139 (1972).
cited Cited "see" M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. International Navigation Corp.
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 461 F.2d 699, 702 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 883 , 93 5.
discussed Cited "see" Smith v. New York City Transit Authority
E.D.N.Y · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 461 F.2d 699 , 703 & n.3 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 883 , 93 S.Ct. 173 , 34 L.Ed.2d 139 (1972); Colon v. State of New York, Div. of Human Rights, 354 F.Supp. 343, 346 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff’d 498 F.2d 1396 (2d Cir. 1974).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Maximo Avila-Dominguez, Albert Perez, Evangeline Salazar and Carolyn Sanchez
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Verduzco-Macias, 463 F.2d 105 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 883 , 93 S.Ct. 173 , 34 L.Ed.2d 139 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Luna
N.M. Ct. App. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
State v. Cloman, 254 Or. 1 , 456 P.2d 67 (1969); see United States v. Richerson, 461 F.2d 935 (10th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 883 , 93 S.Ct. 172 , 34 L.Ed.2d 139 , reh. denied 409 U.S. 1119 , 93 S.Ct. 916 , 34 L.Ed.2d 704 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Glen Thomas Beverly and Faon De Jesus Rodriguez
2d Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Gaines, 460 F.2d 176, 179-80 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 883 , 93 S.Ct. 172 , 34 L.Ed.2d 139 (1972). *205 Appellant Rodriguez contends that this court must vacate his conviction on the conspiracy count, 21 U.S.C. § 846 , because it is inconsistent with Judge Pratt’s instructions to the jury on that count.
cited Cited "see" Artco, Inc. v. DiFruscia
Mass. App. Ct. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 461 F. 2d 699, 702 (2d Cir.), cert. den. 409 U. S. 883 (1972).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Morpurgo v. Bd. of Higher Ed. in City of New York
S.D.N.Y. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 461 F.2d 699 , 703 & n. 3 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 883 , 93 S.Ct. 173 , 34 L.Ed.2d 139 (1972); Marshall v. Electric Hose & Rubber Co., 65 F.R.D. 599, 603-06 (D.Del,1974); cf. Scott v. University of Delaware, 385 F.Supp. 937, 943-45 (D.Del.1974). 11 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Israel Aircraft Industries v. Standard Precision
S.D.N.Y. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 461 F.2d 699 , (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 883 , 93 S.Ct. 173 , 34 L.Ed.2d 139 (1972); Martina Theatre Corp. v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc., supra. While in Kupferman the Court of Appeals declined to find such fraud as would mandate vacating the earlier judgment in that litigation, it did so primarily because “it would be going too far to characterize as ‘fraud on the court’ [defendant’s] failure to disclose an instrument [defendant] could have supposed reasonably — although, as it now appears, erroneously— to have been known to his…
Eskridge
v.
United States
No. 72-5076.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
409 U.S. 883
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 61%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.