Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Savair Mfg. Co., 411 U.S. 964 (1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Savair Mfg. Co., 411 U.S. 964 (1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · “court will look to the facts on a case-by-case basis in the course of weighing the need for the testimony in question against the claims of the newsman that the public’s right to know is impaired.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[cjompelled disclosure of confidential sources ... threatens a journalist’s ability to secure information”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “highly material and relevant, necessary or critical to the maintenance of the claim”
216 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 52 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Sanusi (nyed, 1992-12-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Sanusi
E.D.N.Y · 1992 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
cjompelled disclosure of confidential sources ... threatens a journalist's ability to secure information
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) P. & B. Marina, L. P. v. Logrande
E.D.N.Y · 1991 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
highly material and relevant, necessary or critical to the maintenance of the claim
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Bruno & Stillman, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.
1st Cir. · 1980 · signal: compare · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
court will look to the facts on a case-by-case basis in the course of weighing the need for the testimony in question against the claims of the newsman that the public's right to know is impaired.
cited Cited "see" State Ex Rel. Classic III Inc. v. Ely
Mo. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baker v. F & F Inv. 470 F.2d 778, 784 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Warzon v. Drew
E.D. Wis. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 781 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); Carey v. Hume, 492 F.2d 631 (D.C.Cir.), cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); Riley v. City of Chester, 612 F.2d 708, 715 (3d Cir.1979); Bruno & Stillman, Inc., 633 F.2d at 596-97 .
cited Cited "see" Mount Sinai School of Medicine v. American Tobacco Co.
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 783, 785 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" American Tobacco Company v. American Tobacco Company
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 783, 785 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973). 66 Here, notwithstanding its view that New York law did not establish a scholar's privilege, the district court asked the tobacco companies to "[a]ssume that there is a qualified privilege," and in that context discussed the burdens of compliance.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Subpoena Served on the California Public Utilities Commission. Southern California Edison Company, a California Corporation, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a California Corporation, and California Public Utilities Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Southern California Edison Company, a California Corporation San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a California Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendant- and California Public Utilities Commission
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cobbledick, 309 U.S. at 327-28 , 60 S.Ct. at 542 -43 2 In addition to the cases previously cited, the treatise cites in support of its proposition Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir.1972) (review of a denial to compel discovery in the Second Circuit relating to an action pending in the Seventh Circuit), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); In re Surety Ass'n of Am., 388 F.2d 412 (2d Cir.1967) (review of an order denying a motion to compel a nonparty to comply with a subpoena duces tecum issued in the Second Circuit relating to a case pending in t…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. Plank
7th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Grizaffi, 471 F.2d 69, 74 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 964 , 93 S.Ct. 2141 , 36 L.Ed.2d 684 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Ott v. St. Luke Hospital of Campbell County, Inc.
E.D. Ky. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baker v. F&F Investment Co., 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. den. 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); Robinson v. Magovem, 83 F.R.D. 79 (W.D.Pa.1979); Lora v. City of New York Board of Education, 74 F.R.D. 565 (E.D.N.Y.1977); United States v. King, 73 F.R.D. 103 (E.D.N.Y.1976); Baylor v. Mading — Dugan Drug Co., 57 F.R.D. 509 (N.D.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Orlando Vasquez, Carlos Sanchez, Fernando Eugenio Medina, Amparo Valencia Medina, Clara Inez Mesa and Hernando Mesa
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: accord · confidence high
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, supra. One of the exceptions recognized in this Circuit is the “security check” or “protective sweep” incident to a lawful arrest. 15 When police officers have lawfully entered premises to effect an arrest, they are entitled to make a “quick and limited pass through the premises to check for third persons who may destroy evidence or pose a threat to the officers.” United States v. Gomez, supra, at 1008; accord, United States v. Christophe, 470 F.2d 865, 869 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 964 , 93 S.Ct. 2140 , 36 L.Ed.2d 684 (1973); United States v…
cited Cited "see" Senear v. Daily Journal-American
Wash. Ct. App. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baker v. F & F Inv., 470 F.2d 778, 784-85 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 (1973); Gilbert v. Allied Chem.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jorge Gomez and Henry Serna
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: accord · confidence high
Once the agents lawfully entered Gomez’ apartment, they were entitled to conduct a security check — “a very quick and limited pass through the premises to check for third persons who may destroy evidence or pose a threat to the officers.” United States v. Agapito, supra, 620 F.2d at 335 ; accord, United States v. Christophe, 470 F.2d 865, 869 (2 Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 964 (1973).
cited Cited "see" Zerilli v. Bell
D.D.C. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972) , cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Anthony Herbert v. Barry Lando, Mike Wallace, Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., Atlantic Monthly Company, Barry Lando, Mike Wallace and Cbs Inc. (2×)
2d Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 785 (2d Cir. 1972) (Kaufman J.), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973). 23 See, e. g., Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 611-14 , 93 S.Ct. 2908 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973) (relaxed standing rules to challenge statutes allegedly violative of the First Amendment); Baker v. F & F Investment, supra, 470 F.2d at 783 (rejecting disclosure of journalists' sources in civil rights case except under limited circumstances) 24 Indeed, in Sullivan the Court qualified those standards by the self-imposed procedural limitation that it wo…
cited Cited "see" Altemose Const. Co. v. BLDG. & CONST. TRADES COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA
E.D. Pa. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baker v. F. & F. Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
cited Cited "see" Casino Foods Corporation v. Kraftco Corporation
9th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Sterling v. Wyrick
W.D. Mo. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gomori v. Brierley, 334 F.Supp. 672 (W.D.Pa.1971), aff’d 474 F.2d 1338 , cert. denied 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 ; Hibbard v. Gladden, 368 F.2d 311 (D.Ore.1966); Miller v. Crouse, 346 F.2d 301 (10th Cir. 1965); Olson v. Tahash, 344 F.2d 139 (8th Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 858 , 86 S.Ct. 113 , 15 L.Ed.2d 96 .
cited Cited "see" Richards of Rockford, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
N.D. Cal. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2 Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
cited Cited "see" Nomey v. State
La. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See 411 U.S. 961 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 681 (1973). *715 Two years later, this Court decided another local option case: State v. Sissons, La., 292 So.2d 523 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Cecil Ray Johnson (2×)
7th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Grizaffi, 471 F.2d 69, 75 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 964 , 93 S.Ct. 2141 , 36 L.Ed.2d 684 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Solarex Corporation and Rca Corporation v. Arco Solar, Inc. v. The American Physical Society
Fed. Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
The standard of review in that circuit of a discovery ruling is whether Arco has made a “clear showing of abuse of discretion.” Robertson v. National Basketball Ass’n, 622 F.2d 34, 35-36 (2d Cir.1980); see also Baker v. F & F Inv., 470 F.2d 778, 781 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Kelly Rollins and Dan Slaughter
7th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Even where a witness entirely refuses to discuss a case with the defense, a missing witness instruction may be appropriately denied.” United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 702 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); see also United States v. Grizaffi, 471 F.2d 69, 74 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 964 , 93 S.Ct. 2142 , 36 L.Ed.2d 684 (1973) (district court correctly refused to give missing witness instruction where unindicted co-conspirator refused to discuss the case with defense counsel, and defendant chose not to call witness be…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gould Inc. v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd.
2d Cir. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 781 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973). 12 Nevertheless, in this case we have no basis upon which to review the district court's order.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Gould Inc. v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co.
2d Cir. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 781 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated January 4, 1984
E.D.N.Y · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 780-83 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76-77 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 146-49 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 436-38 (10th Cir.1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Maressa v. New Jersey Monthly (2×)
N.J. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Baker v. F. & F. Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 785 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. den., 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); Democratic National Committee v. McCord, 356 F.Supp. 1394 (D.D.C.1973).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Anthony T. Zerilli and Michael Polizzi v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United States Anthony J. Zerilli v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United States
D.C. Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); Carter v. Baltimore & Ohio R.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Zerilli v. Smith
D.C. Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); Carter v. Baltimore & Ohio R.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. David Manley and Fluer Williams
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Christophe, 470 F.2d 865, 869 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 964 , 93 S.Ct. 2140 , 36 L.Ed.2d 684 (1973).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mannino
S.D.N.Y. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Christophe, 470 F.2d 865, 869 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 964 , 93 S.Ct. 2140 , 36 L.Ed.2d 684 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1979 · signal: compare · confidence low
And in Carey v. Hume, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 365, 369 , 492 F.2d 632 , 636, cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974), this court, before upholding an order of disclosure in a civil libel suit, adopted as its approach one in which “the court will look to the facts on a case-by-case basis in the course of weighing the need for the testimony in question against the claims of the newsman that the public’s right to know is impaired.” In Carey the court found that the information sought “appears to go to the heart of appellee’s libel action,” id; compare Baker v. F…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Labor Relations Board
v.
Savair Manufacturing Co.
No. 72-1231.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 7, 1973.
411 U.S. 964
Published
3 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 76%
Citer courts: E.D. New York (2) · First Circuit (1)

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.