Cunningham v. Warden, 409 U.S. 901 (1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Cunningham v. Warden, 409 U.S. 901 (1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 6× by 1 distinct case · “[ajllegations of a subjective ‘chill’ are not an adequate substitute for a claim of specific present objective harm or a threat of specific future harm”
45 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 28 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: O'KEEFE v. Murphy (waed, 1994-08-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) O'KEEFE v. Murphy
E.D. Wash. · 1994 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
ajllegations of a subjective 'chill' are not an adequate substitute for a claim of specific present objective harm or a threat of specific future harm
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Travelers Social Club v. City of Pittsburgh
W.D. Pa. · 1988 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
subjective 'chill' is not an adequate substitute for a claim of specific present objective harm or a threat of specific future harm.
discussed Cited "see" Patrick v. City of Chicago
N.D. Ill. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rotunda & Nowak, Treatise On Constitutional Law § 18.30(a), at 205 (4th ed. 2008) (citing Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1 , 92 S.Ct. 2318 , 33 L.Ed.2d 154 (1972), rehearing denied 409 U.S. 901 , 93 S.Ct. 94 , 34 L.Ed.2d 165 (1972)) ("[UJnless an individual could show identifiable harm from government investigation or data collection practices that individual would not have standing to maintain a suit to limit such practices”).
discussed Cited "see" Miles v. State (2×)
Md. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bartholomey v. State, 260 Md. 504, 513 , 273 A.2d 164, 169 (1971), modified, 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S.Ct. 2870 , 33 L.Ed.2d 759 (1972), reh'g denied, 409 U.S. 901 , 93 S.Ct. 180 , 34 L.Ed.2d 162 (1972).
cited Cited "see" Haase v. Webster
D.D.C. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1 , 92 S.Ct. 2318 , 33 L.Ed.2d 154 , reh’g denied, 409 U.S. 901 , 93 S.Ct. 94 , 34 L.Ed.2d 165 (1972). 8 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Trimble v. State
Md. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Bartholomey v. State, 260 Md. 504, 513 , 273 A.2d 164 (1971), vacated in part and remanded on other grounds, 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S.Ct. 2870 , 33 L.Ed.2d 759 (1972), reh’g denied, 409 U.S. 901 , 93 S.Ct. 180 , 34 L.Ed.2d 162 (1972).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cherry v. Koch
N.Y. App. Div. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
N. S., Inc. v State of Ind., supra, at 306; see also, Laird v Tatum, 408 US 1, 13-14 , reh denied 409 US 901 ; Younger v Harris, supra, at 42 ; Poe v Ullman, 367 US 497, 503-504 , reh denied 368 US 869 ).
Cunningham
v.
Warden, Maryland Penitentiary Arrington v. Maryland Bartholomey v. Maryland Tull v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary Strong v. Maryland Nachbaur v. Herman Negron v. Agnew, State Hospital Director Shields v. United States Gilmore v. Maryland Diggs v. United States Bradley v. Wingo, Warden Owings v. Secretary of the Air Force Tilli v. Davis
No. 70-5062; No. 70-5326; No. 71-5008; No. 71-5192; No. 71-5197; No. 71-5689; No. 71-6109; No. 71-6120; No. 71-6137; No. 71-6341; No. 71-6242; No. 71-6257; No. 71-6480.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
409 U.S. 901
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 74%
Citer courts: W.D. Pennsylvania (1) · E.D. Washington (1)

Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar