Joseph v. Henderson, 414 U.S. 846 (1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Joseph v. Henderson, 414 U.S. 846 (1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
82 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Darryl Ray Evans, A/K/A Derrick Savage (ca9, 1992-10-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Darryl Ray Evans, A/K/A Derrick Savage
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Peterson, 475 F.2d 806, 810-11 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct. 111 , 38 L.Ed.2d 93 (1973). 2 *1114 B.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. David Taketa and Thomas O'Brien
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
Alderman, 394 U.S. at 175 -76 n. 9, 89 S.Ct. at 967 -68 n. 9; see United States v. King, 478 F.2d 494, 506 (9th Cir.) (defendant may move to suppress wiretap only if his conversation was intercepted, or if conversation occurred on his premises), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct. 111 , 38 L.Ed.2d 94 (1973), 417 U.S. 920 , 94 S.Ct. 2628 , 41 L.Ed.2d 226 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" John Lee Brown v. Continental Telephone Company of Virginia, Inc. Edward H. Garland
4th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 335 F.Supp. 523, 534 , (S.D.Cal.1971), aff’d in part and rev’d in part on other grounds, 478 F.2d 494 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct. 111 , 38 L.Ed.2d 94 (1973); 417 U.S. 920 , 94 S.Ct. 2628 , 41 L.Ed.2d 226 (1974).
cited Cited "see" The United States of America v. Steven Lee Greer
6th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Peterson, 475 F.2d 806, 810 (9th Cir.) cert. den. 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct. 111 , 38 L.Ed.2d 93 (1975).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Bonifacio De La Fuente, Ronald Albert Cardenas, George Sierra, Pat Vargas,augie D. Sierra, and Robert Stewart
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 478 F.2d 494 (9 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct. *536 111, 38 L.Ed.2d 94 , for a detailed explanation of the mechanics of this “paper charade.” 9 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. James Joseph Testa, United States of America v. Edward Epstein
9th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 478 F.2d 494 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct. 111 , 38 L.Ed.2d 94 sub nom.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Vento
3rd Cir. · 1976 · signal: accord · confidence high
See State v. Spease, 319 A.2d 560, 567-73 (Md.1974); accord, United States v. King, 355 F.Supp. 523, 543-45 (S.D.Cal.1971), modified, 478 F.2d 494 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct. 111 , 38 L.Ed.2d 94 (1973); United States v. LaGorga, 336 F.Supp. 190, 195-97 (W.D.Pa.1971); United States v. Iannelli, 339 F.Supp. 171, 173 (W.D.Pa.1971), aff'd 477 F.2d 999 (3d Cir. 1973), aff'd 420 U.S. 770 , 95 S.Ct. 1284 , 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Vento
3rd Cir. · 1976 · signal: accord · confidence high
See State v. Spease, 319 A.2d 560, 567-73 (Md.1974); accord, United States v. King, 355 F.Supp. 523, 543-45 (S.D.Cal.1971), modified, 478 F.2d 494 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bruce Charles Curtis
1st Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
United States v. Harflinger, 436 F.2d 928 (8th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 973 , 91 S.Ct. 1660 , 29 L.Ed.2d 137 (1971); see United States v. Peterson, 475 F.2d 806 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct. 111 , 38 L.Ed.2d 93 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Larry J. Copus
7th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Ragusa, 664 F.2d 696, 699 (8th Cir.1981) (crude, improvised bomb constituted “destructive device”), ce rt. denied, 457 U.S. 1133 , 102 S.Ct. 2958 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1982); Markley, 567 F.2d at 526-27 (rejecting Posnjak view and concluding that home-made bomb could qualify as a “destructive device”); see also United States v. Peterson, 475 F.2d 806 (9th Cir.) (incendiary device made from a highway warning flare), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct. 111 , 38 L.Ed.2d 93 (1973); United States v. Ross, 458 F.2d 1144 (5th Cir.1972) (Molotov cocktail).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Joseph Wilson
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Harflinger, 436 F.2d 928 (8th Cir. 1970), cert. den., 402 U.S. 973 , 91 S.Ct. 1660 , 29 L.Ed.2d 137 (1971); see also United States v. Peterson, 475 F.2d 806 (9th Cir.), cert. den., 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct. 111 , 38 L.Ed.2d 93 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mitchell v. United States (2×)
D.C. · 1977 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. King, 335 P.Supp. 523 (S.D.Cal.1971), modified, 478 E.2d 494 (9,th Cir.), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph
v.
Henderson, Warden
No. 72-6837.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
414 U.S. 846
Published

Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.