green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lavoie v. Town of Hudson
Bearing in mind the Supreme Court has long held that the Fourth Amendment should be liberally construed, Go-Bart Co. v. United States, 282 U.S. 344, 357 , 51 *94 S.Ct. 153, 158, 75 L.Ed. 374 (1931) (citing Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 623 , 6 S.Ct. 524, 528 , 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886), Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 389-392 , 34 S.Ct. 341, 343-344 , 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914)), the court is so inclined to pass on the issue of reasonableness at this juncture.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaplan v. Kaplan
See Jett v. Zink, 474 F.2d 149 (5th Cir.) (even if state law is unclear, it is clear that both cases can be heard simultaneously in state and federal court), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 104 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington Legal Foundation v. Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation
See Jett v. Zink, 474 F.2d 149, 154-55 (5th Cir.) (party who argued on first appeal that action was in personam precluded from arguing on second appeal that action was quasi in rem), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 104 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Glickstein ex rel. Estate of Glickstein v. Sun Bank/Miami, N.A.
See Jett v. Zink, 474 F.2d 149 (5th Cir.) (even if state law is unclear, it is clear that both cases can be heard simultaneously in state and federal court), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 104 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Glickstein v. Sun Bank Miami
See Jett v. Zink, 474 F.2d 149 (5th Cir.) (even if state law is unclear, it is clear that both cases can be heard simultaneously in state and federal court), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 104 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lou v. Belzberg
See Jett v. Zink, 474 F.2d 149 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 104 (1973); Parks v. New York Times Co., 308 F.2d 474 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 949 , 84 S.Ct. 964 , 11 L.Ed.2d 969 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
A. Jacques Lou v. William Belzberg Hyman Belzberg Samuel Belzberg First City Financial Corporation First City Trust Company Roxboro Investments Ltd. Bel-Fran Investments Ltd. Bel-Cal Holdings Ltd. Bel-Alta Holdings Ltd. Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc. John R. Hall Robert T. McCowan William R. Seaton Charles J. Luellen Samuel C. Butler Eugene W. Erikson James B. Farley Robert D. Gordon Walter W. Hillenmeyer Don T. McKone Harold S. Mohler Grover E. Murray Jane C. Pfeiffer Robert S. Reigeluth James R. Rinehart F.H. Ross Robert Stobaugh Richard L. Terrell James W. Vandereer Ashland Oil, Inc., Pauline Mickler Erwin A. Sherman Lynch, Sherman & Cox Merrill G. Davidoff Sherrie R. Savett Berger & Montague, P.C., A. Jacques Lou v. William Belzberg Hyman Belzberg Samuel Belzberg First City Financial Corporation First City Trust Company Roxboro Investments Ltd. Bel-Fran Investments Ltd. Bel-Cal Holdings Ltd. Bel-Alta Holdings Ltd. Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc. John R. Hall Robert T. McCowan William R. Seaton Charles J. Luellen Samuel C. Butler Eugene W. Erikson James B. Farley Robert D. Gordon Walter W. Hillenmeyer Don T. McKone Harold S. Mohler Grover E. Murray Jane C. Pfeiffer Robert S. Reigeluth F.H. Ross Robert B. Stobaugh Richard L. Terrell James W. Vandereer
See Jett v. Zink, 474 F.2d 149 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 104 (1973); Parks v. New York Times Co., 308 F.2d 474 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 949 , 84 S.Ct. 964 , 11 L.Ed.2d 969 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walter HARPER, Appellant, v. GENERAL GROCERS COMPANY, A/K/A Topmost General Grocers, Appellee
See Reed v. Arlington Hotel Company, Inc., 476 F.2d 721, 726 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973); Gamble v. Birmingham Southern Railroad Co., 514 F.2d 678, 683 (5th Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Blackshere v. Allied Materials Corp.
Smith Corp., 51 F.R.D. 479 (D.S.C.1971); see Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F.2d 721 (Fifth Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Bolton v. Murray Envelope Corp.
Accord, Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F.2d 721 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973); Parham v. Southwestern Bell Tel.
cited
Cited "see"
15 Fair empl.prac.cas. 478, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7606 Mrs. Natalie Bolton, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Murray Envelope Corporation
Accord, Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F.2d 721 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973); Parham v. Southwestern Bell Tel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Marceline M. DONALDSON and Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. the PILLSBURY COMPANY Et Al., Appellees
(2×)
See Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F.2d 721, 723 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973); Parham v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 433 F.2d 421, 425 (8th Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
11 Fair empl.prac.cas. 872, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,504 Sandra Lee Kaplan v. International Alliance of Theatrical and Stage Employees and Motion Picture MacHine Operators of the United States and Canada, and Local 659, International Photographers of the Motion Picture Industries
See Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F.2d 721, 726 (8 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973); Rosenfeld v. Southern Pacific Co., 293 F.Supp. 1219, 1227 (C.D.Cal.1968), aff'd 444 F.2d 1219 (9 Cir. 1971). 56 Affirmed. 57 SNEED, J., concurs in the result. * Honorable Charles L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaplan v. International Alliance of Theatrical & Stage Employees & Motion Picture Machine Operators
See Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F.2d 721, 726 (8 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973); Rosenfeld v. Southern Pacific Co., 293 F.Supp. 1219, 1227 (C.D.Cal.1968), aff’d 444 F.2d 1219 (9 Cir. 1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Buck Green v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation
See Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F.2d 721, 723 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973); Parham v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., supra, 433 F.2d at 425—26.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wendell Douglas Frith, a Minor, by Alton Frith, Adult Next Friend v. Blazon-Flexible Flyer, Inc. And Western Auto Supply Company, Inc.
See Jett v. Zink, 474 F.2d 149 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 104 (1973); Parks v. New York Times Co., 308 F.2d 474 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 949 , 84 S.Ct. 964 , 11 L.Ed.2d 969 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gregory v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
(2×)
See, e.g., Jett v. Zink, 474 F.2d 149, 154-55 (5th Cir.) (party who argued on first appeal that action was in personam was precluded from arguing on second appeal that the action was quasi in rem ), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 104 (1973). 25 But, more important, for this challenge to the peremptory instruction, it is the language of the instruction that must control.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chambers v. Omaha Girls Club
See, e.g., Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F.2d 721, 723 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973). 39 There are, however, situations where it is appropriate for an individual to proceed under a disparate impact theory.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCarther v. Camelot Inn of Little Rock
See also, Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F.2d 721 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973); Parham v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 433 F.2d 421 (8th Cir. 1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Aubrey J. CROSS and John Lee Parks, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL TRUST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
See also Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., supra, and Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F.2d 721 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Selected Risks Insurance v. Kobelinski
See also, Jett v. Zink, 474 F.2d 149 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 104 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
10 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1057, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,199 Hyland Lewis Barnett v. W. T. Grant Company, a Corporation, Hyland Lewis Barnett v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, an Unincorporated Labor Organization
See also Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F.2d 721, 723 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973) (discrimination indicated by statistics showing blacks excluded from only five of 11 departments in hotel)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnett v. W. T. Grant Co.
See also Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F.2d 721, 723 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854 , 94 S.Ct. 153 , 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973) (discrimination indicated by statistics showing blacks excluded from only five of 11 departments in hotel).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aronson
v.
Ambrose
v.
Ambrose
No. 73-20.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.