green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.4 score
“it is sufficient for us to say that when, as here, a jury has been demanded and the facts give rise to conflicting inferences on the issue of reasonable diligence, the question must be submitted to the jury.”
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hill v. Equitable Bank
it is sufficient for us to say that when, as here, a jury has been demanded and the facts give rise to conflicting inferences on the issue of reasonable diligence, the question must be submitted to the jury.
cited
Cited "see"
Walker v. Cardinal Savings & Loan Ass'n
See Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 488 F.2d 912, 914 (4th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Western Federal Corp. v. Davis
See Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 297 F.Supp. 1165, 1228 (D.C.Md.1968), affirmed in part, reversed in part, 422 F.2d 1124 (4th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Koy E. Dawkins, C. Frank Griffin, John R. Nichols and Hazel Nichols
See Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 422 F.2d 1124, 1131 (4 Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974); Ott v. Midland-Ross Corp., 600 F.2d 24, 28 (6 Cir. 1979). * * * * * * * The finding of the district court that the government acted in bad faith by vexatiously pursuing a meritless case is not supported by the law or the record.
discussed
Cited "see"
American General Insurance v. Equitable General Corp.
See Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 326 F.Supp. 250 , 258 n.11 (D.Md.1971), aff’d as to liability, 488 F.2d 912 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sleeper v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.
See Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 4 Cir. 1970, 422 F.2d 1124 , reconsidered after remand, 1973, 488 F.2d 912 , cert. denied 1974, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 ; Klein v. Bower, supra; Tobacco & Allied Stocks v. Transamerica Corp., D.Del.1956, 143 F.Supp. 323 , aff’d, 3 Cir. 1957, 244 F.2d 902 .
discussed
Cited "see"
ALTON BOX BOARD COMPANY, Appellant, v. GOLDMAN, SACHS AND COMPANY, Appellee
See Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 422 F.2d 1124, 1128 (4th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974); University Hill Foundation v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., supra, at 892.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mills v. Roanoke Industrial Loan & Thrift
E. g., Rochez Bros., Inc. v. Rhoades, 491 F.2d 402 (3d Cir. 1973); Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 480 F.2d 341 (2nd Cir. 1973); Simon v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., 482 F.2d 880 (5th Cir. 1973); see Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 488 F.2d 912, 914-915 (4th Cir. 1973) cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Nathaniel Williams v. J. E. Lavallee, Warden of Clinton Correctional Facility, Dannemora, N. Y.
See 94 S.Ct. 1622 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
See, e. g., Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 488 F.2d 912, 916 (4th Cir. 1973) (defendant entitled to jury trial on factual issues in plaintiff’s action for recission of contract so long as plaintiff holds claim for damages in reserve should court find that it is not entitled to recission) cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974); Minnesota Mutual Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co.
See also Johns Hopkins Univ. v. Hutton, 422 F.2d 1124, 1130 (4th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974); Jerger v. Rubin, 106 Ariz. 114 , 471 P.2d 726, 731 (1970). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. B & O Railroad
See, e. g., Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 488 F.2d 912, 918 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arthur D. OTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIDLAND-ROSS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
See also Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 422 F.2d 1124, 1131 (4th Cir. 1970), appeal after remand, 488 F.2d 912 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co.
Compare Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 422 F.2d 1124, 1130 (4th Cir. 1970) (respondeat superior not supplanted by § 15), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974); Armstrong, Jones & Co. v. SEC, 421 F.2d 359, 362 (6th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 958 , 90 S.Ct. 2172 , 26 L.Ed.2d 543 (1970), with Kamen & Co. v. Paul H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co.
Compare Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 422 F.2d 1124, 1130 (4th Cir. 1970) (respondeat superior not supplanted by § 15), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974); Armstrong, Jones & Co. v. SEC, 421 F.2d 359, 362 (6th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 958 , 90 S.Ct. 2172 , 26 L.Ed.2d 543 (1970), with Kamen & Co. v. Paul H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gannett Co., Inc. v. Register Pub. Co.
See, e.g., Johns Hopkins Univ. v. Hutton, 488 F.2d 912 , 916 n.12 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974); Royal Air Properties, Inc. v. Smith, 312 F.2d 210 (9th Cir. 1962); Wassel v. Eglowsky, 399 F.Supp. 1330 (D.Md. 1975); Fox v. Kane-Miller Corp., 398 F.Supp. 609 (D.Md. 1975); Goodman v. Poland, 395 F.Supp. 660 (D.Md. 1975); Ehrler v. Kellwood Co., 391 F.Supp. 927 (E.D.Mo. 1975, aff’d, 521 F.2d 1347 (8th Cir. 1975); Chelsea Associates v. Rapanos, 376 F.Supp. 929 (E.D.Mich. 1974), aff’d, 527 F.2d 1266 (6th Cir. 1975); Marth v. Industrial Income…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,441 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Geon Industries, Inc., Frank Bloom and Edwards & Hanly
Lewis v. Walston & Co., 487 F.2d 617, 623-24 (5 Cir. 1973) (sale of unregistered stock, within scope of employment); Fey v. Walston & Co., 493 F.2d 1036, 1051-53 (7 Cir. 1974) (churning); see also Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 422 F.2d 1124, 1130 (4 Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1622 , 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974) (fraudulent misrepresentations).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California
v.
Paschall
v.
Paschall
No. 73-1093.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 1, 1974.
Published
Citer courts: D. Delaware (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Motion of respondént for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.