green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.4 score
“the purpose of the expediting act, as its very title indicates, is to eliminate piecemeal appeals”
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Gruss
the purpose of the expediting act, as its very title indicates, is to eliminate piecemeal appeals
cited
Cited "see"
Quantum Corporation and Plus Development Corporation v. Tandon Corporation
See IBM v. United States, 480 F.2d 293 , 298 (2d Cir.1973) (in banc), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 980 , 94 S.Ct. 2413 , 40 L.Ed.2d 777 (1974). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Newsom v. Vanderbilt University
See Jackson v. Norton-Children's Hospitals, Inc., 487 F.2d 502, 503 (6th Cir. 1973) (per curiam), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 1000 , 94 S.Ct. 2413 , 40 L.Ed.2d 776 (1974). 66 This Court rejected an analogous claim of state action in Griffith v. Bell-Whitley Community Action Agency, 614 F.2d 1102, 1108-10 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 928 , 100 S.Ct. 3025 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Newsom v. Vanderbilt University
See Jackson v. Norton-Children’s Hospitals, Inc., 487 F.2d 502, 503 (6th Cir. 1973) (per curiam), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 1000 , 94 S.Ct. 2413 , 40 L.Ed.2d 776 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grinnell Corp. v. Hackett
See International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 471 F.2d 507, 514 (2d Cir. 1972), rev’d on other issues, 480 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1973) (en banc), cert. and leave to file petition for extraordinary writ denied, 416 U.S. 979 , 980, 94 S.Ct. 2413 , 40 L.Ed.2d 776 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grinnell Corporation v. Hackett
See International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 471 F.2d 507, 514 (2d Cir. 1972), rev'd on other issues, 480 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1973) (en banc), cert. and leave to file petition for extraordinary writ denied, 416 U.S. 979 , 980, 94 S.Ct. 2413 , 40 L.Ed.2d 776 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Indiana Hospital
See also Jackson v. Norton-Children’s Hospital, Inc., 487 F.2d 502, 503 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 1000 , 94 S.Ct. 2413 , 40 L.Ed.2d 776 (1974), rehearing denied, 417 U.S. 978 , 94 S.Ct. 3189 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1974) (No class-based animus in a suit by a discharged physician against a hospital); Ward v. St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manning v. Greensville Memorial Hospital
Compare Jackson v. Norton —Chil dren’s Hospitals, Inc., 487 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 1000 , 94 S.Ct. 2413 , 40 L.Ed.2d 776 (1974) (no state action where only involvement was Hill-Burton participation and general state regulations governing hospitals), with O’Neill v. Grayson County War Memorial Hospital, 472 F.2d 1140 (6th Cir. 1973) (state action based on Hill-Burton participation, as well as facts that defendant was only hospital in county, hospital leased premises from county for fifteen years for $1.00, and make-up of hospital’s board subject to terms of lea…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
International Business Machines Corp.
v.
Edelstein, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court
v.
Edelstein, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court
No. 72-1662.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1974.
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion for leave to file petition for[*980] writ of certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Blackmun and Mr. Justice Powell took'no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.