Scarpa v. United States Bd. of Parole, 414 U.S. 809 (1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Scarpa v. United States Bd. of Parole, 414 U.S. 809 (1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
79 citation events across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Albano v. Anderson (pamd, 1979-03-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Albano v. Anderson
M.D. Penn. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Scarpa v. United States Parole Board, 477 F.2d 278, 281 (5th Cir.), vacated as moot, 414 U.S. 809 , 94 S.Ct. 79 , 38 L.Ed.2d 44 (1973); Persico v. United States Department of Justice, 426 F.Supp. 1013, 1019 (E.D.Ill.1977); Barradale v. United States Parole Board, 362 F.Supp. 338, 340 (M.D.Pa.1973).
discussed Cited "see" J. T. Roach v. Board of Pardons and Paroles, State of Arkansas
8th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Scarpa v. United States Board of Parole, 477 F.2d 278, 280-281 (5th Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded for consideration of mootness, 414 U.S. 809 , 94 S.Ct. 79 , 38 L.Ed.2d 44 ; Riley v. Perini, 422 F.2d 397 (6th Cir. 1970); Jones v. Salisbury, 422 F.2d 1326 (6th Cir. 1970).
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. James T. Lynn, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
D.C. Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See 414 U.S. 809 , 94 S.Ct. 26 , 38 L.Ed.2d 44 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Douglas Glynn Payton, Administrator of the Estate of Sheryl Lynn Payton, Deceased v. The United States of America
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Scarpa v. U.S. Board of Parole, 477 F.2d 278, 280-82 (5th Cir.) vacated for consideration of mootness, 414 U.S. 809 , 94 S.Ct. 79 , 38 L.Ed.2d 44 , dismissed as moot, 501 F.2d 992 (5th Cir. 1973); Tarlton v. Clark, 441 F.2d 384 , 385-86 (5th Cir. 1971).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barr v. United States
W.D. Okla. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Scarpa v. United States Board of Parole, 477 F.2d 278 (CA5 1973), reversed and remanded for consideration of question of mootness, 414 U.S. 809 , 94 S.Ct. 79 , 38 L.Ed.2d 44 (1974), conformed to 501 F.2d 992 (District Court directed to dismiss as moot).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wiley v. United States Board of Parole
M.D. Penn. · 1974 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Scarpa v. United States Board of Parole, 5 Cir. 1973, 477 F.2d 278 (en banc), vacated and remanded for consideration of question of mootness, 1974, 414 U.S. 809 , 94 S.Ct 79 , 38 L.Ed.2d 44 ; Farries v. United States Board of Parole, 7 Cir. 1973, 484 F.2d 948 ; Mosley v. Ashby, 3 Cir. 1972, 459 F.2d 477 ; Madden v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 3 Cir. 1971, 438 F.2d 1189 ; United States ex rel.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States Ex Rel. Harrison v. Pace
E.D. Pa. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Madden v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 438 F.2d 1189 (3d Cir. 1971); Mosley v. Ashby, 459 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1972); see also Scarpa v. U. S. Board of Parole, 477 F.2d 278 (5th Cir. 1973) (en banc), vacated and remanded for consideration of mootness, 414 U.S. 809 , 94 S. Ct. 79 , 38 L.Ed.2d 44 (1973). 6 Because affirmative relief is no longer appropriate in this action, and since the defendants have established valid immunity and good faith defenses, they would not be liable for monetary damages to plaintiff; hence, defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be granted, plaintiff's mot…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States ex rel. Johnson v. Chairman of New York State Board of Parole
2d Cir. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Scarpa v. United States Board of Parole, 477 F.2d 278 , 282 and n. 17 (5th Cir. 1973) (en banc), vacated as moot, 414 U.S. 809 , 94 S.Ct. 79 , 38 L.Ed.2d 44 (1974); Walker v. Oswald, 449 F.2d 481 (2d Cir. 1971).
Scarpa
v.
United States Board of Parole
No. 73-5053.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
414 U.S. 809
Douglas.
Cited by 20 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for consideration of question of mootness.

Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.