green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jessie J. Miller, Jr., Cross-Appellee, Jjm Trucking, Inc.
See United States v. Sellers, 483 F.2d 37, 45 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974), overruled on other grounds by United States v. McKeever, 905 F.2d 829 (5th Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1070 , 111 S.Ct. 790 , 112 L.Ed.2d 852 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Troy W. Vaden
United States v. Fagan, 821 F.2d 1002, 1012 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 697 , 98 L.Ed.2d 649 (1988) (quoting Russell v. United States, 222 F.2d 197, 199 (5th Cir.1955)); see United States v. Sellers, 483 F.2d 37, 45 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Taxpayers for the Animas-La Plata Referendum v. Animas-La Plata Water Conservancy District
See Smith v. Losee, 485 F.2d 334, 344 (10th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Taxpayers For The Animas-La Plata Referendum v. Animas-La Plata Water Conservancy District
See Smith v. Losee, 485 F.2d 334, 344 (10th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Webber v. Rysavy
See generally United States v. Sellers, 483 F.2d 37, 43-44 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Webber v. Rysavy
See generally United States v. Sellers, 483 F.2d 37, 43-44 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974). 7 We therefore hold that the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Rysavy and Seibert on all counts of Webber's complaint, and, accordingly, affirm the district court's judgment of dismissal. 1 Webber also alleged that Seibert acted as cocounsel to the county attorney in his criminal trial and tampered with evidence during that trial 2 In the alternative, Seibert moved to dismiss Webber's complaint for failure to state a claim 3 …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Billy Wayne Reeder
Accord, United States v. Sellers, 483 F.2d 37, 44-45 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974); United States v. Tomeo, 459 F.2d 445 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 914 , 93 S.Ct. 232 , 34 L.Ed.2d 175 (1972); Sagansky v. United States, 358 F.2d 195 (1st Cir. 1966).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan G. Rios
See United States v. Sellers, 483 F.2d 37, 43 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 .
cited
Cited "see"
Berry v. Arthur
See Smith v. Losee, 485 F.2d 334 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Cooper v. Hollis
See Smith v. Losee, 485 F.2d 334 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, and Charles Edward Gent, Jr.
See United States v. Sellers, 483 F.2d 37 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Donna Bertot v. School District No. 1, Albany County, Wyoming, Martha Sweeney v. School District No. 1, Albany County, Wyoming
See Smith v. Losee, 485 F.2d 334, 338-340 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Helen Crabtree, Hershie Laff, Murray Yunes, Nicholas Hercules Nardone
See United States v. Roberts, 477 F.2d 57 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Al-Zubaidi v. Ijaz
See also Smith v. Losee, 485 F.2d 334, 336-40 (10th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 [ 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 ] ... (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Mahler
See, e.g., United States v. Sellers, 483 F. 2d 37 (5 Cir.1973), cert. den. 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed. 2d 212 (1974), specifically holding that If the warrant was issued under authority of Rule 41 as a federal warrant clearly it must comply with the requirements of the rule.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leroy Thompson v. Parole Supervisor Burke, Pennsylvania Parole Board Member Jefferson, and Parole Agent Strickler
See also Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U.S. 367 , 71 S.Ct. 783 , 95 L.Ed. 1019 (1951), and Smith v. Losse, 485 F.2d 334, 344 (10th Cir. 1973) (en banc), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2604 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974), and Hayes v. Cape Henlopen School District, 341 F.Supp. 823, 829 (D.Del.1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gregorio Jaramillo, United States of America v. Michael Eugene Sturdevant
See also United States v. Wilson, 492 F.2d 1345 (3rd Cir. 1973), cert. granted, 417 U.S. 908 , 94 S.Ct. 2603 , 41 L.Ed.2d 211 (1974). 7 .
United States
v.
Jenkins
v.
Jenkins
No. 73-1513.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 1974.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted and case set for oral argument with No. 73-1395 [immediately supra].