green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
Yslava v. Hughes Aircraft Co.
(3×)
See State v. Cassius, 110 Ariz. 485, 487 , 520 P.2d 1109, 1111 (1974) (‘Where a statute first expresses a general intent, and later an inconsistent particular intent, such particular intent will be taken as an exception to the general intent, and both will stand.”), cert. dismissed, 420 U.S. 514 , 95 S.Ct. 1345 , 43 L.Ed.2d 362 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael J. Cassius
v.
State of Arizona
v.
State of Arizona
74-5140.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1975.
Frederick S. Klein argued the cause for petitioner pro hac vice. With him on the briefs was John M. Neis., William J. Schafer III argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Bruce E. Babbitt, Attorney General of Arizona, N. Warner Lee, former Attorney General, and Grove M. Callison, Assistant Attorney General.
Blackmun, Powell, Douglas.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr. Justice Blackmun and Mr. Justice Powell dissent. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.