Tocco v. United States, 420 U.S. 1006 (1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Tocco v. United States, 420 U.S. 1006 (1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
62 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Franklin v. United States (dc, 1989-03-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Franklin v. United States
D.C. · 1989 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Lee, 166 U.S. App.D.C. 67, 72, 509 F.2d 400, 405 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 1451 , 43 L.Ed.2d 765 (1975); Crawford v. United States, 59 App.D.C. 356, 357 , 41 F.2d 979, 980 (1930); see also Thomas v. United States, 74 App.D.C. 167, 169 , 121 F.2d 905, 907 (1941).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Whitley (2×)
E.D. Mich. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See U. S. v. Regan, 503 F.2d 284 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 1449 , 48 L.Ed.2d 764 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. William D. Morgan (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lee, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 67, 71 , 509 F.2d 400, 404 (1974), Cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 1451 , 43 L.Ed.2d 765 (1975). 21 The absence of fingerprints is one of those arguments that is frequently advanced when a guilty defendant cannot point to any real weakness in the prosecution's case.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Leonard Peltier (2×)
8th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Regan, 503 F.2d 234, 237 (8th Cir.1974) (per curiam), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 1449 , 43 L.Ed.2d 764 (1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Leonard Peltier
8th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g, United States v. Regan, 503 F.2d 234, 237 (8th Cir. 1974) (per curiam), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1006 (1975). -3- Mr. Peltier also intimates that because (in his view) the government prevented him from presenting material evidence to the sentencing court on the occasion of his original Rule 35 motion, equity requires that the district court extend the 120-day time limit so that he may have an opportunity to present this evidence in support of his motion to reduce his sentences.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tocco
v.
United States
No. 74-5819.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 1975.
420 U.S. 1006
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.