green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In the Matter of the Lehigh and New England Railway Company, Debtor. United States of America, Erie Lackawanna, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenors in D.C. Appeal of Central Jersey Industries, Inc
But see Erie's contentions reflected in note 10, infra 9 For an example of the relationship between the government lien, the secured creditors, and the sale of unmortgaged assets, see note 1 of Judge Rosenn's concurring opinion in In re Penn Central Transportation Co. (Columbus Option Case), 494 F.2d 270, 284 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974) 10 In light of our disposition, we have no need to address CJI's second argument, that the district court had failed to limit the priority which it gave to interline claims to just freight revenue received by L&N…
cited
Cited "but see"
Burkhart v. Saxbe
But cf. United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 881 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 121 (1974). 24 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Debtor. Appeal of FARMERS COOPERATIVE ELEVATOR, RAKE, IOWA
See In re Penn Central Transportation Co., 494 F.2d 270, 273-75 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974); Section 77(o) of the old Bankruptcy Act (formerly codified at 11 U.S.C. § 205 (o) (1970)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Falvey
See United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom., Ivanov v. United States, 419 U.S. 881 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 121 (1974); United States v. Brown, 484 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1490 , 39 L.Ed.2d 575 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Truong Dinh Hung, United States of America v. Ronald Louis Humphrey
(2×)
Accord, United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593 (3 Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Ivanov v. United States, 419 U.S. 881 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 121 (1974); United States v. Brown, 484 F.2d 418 (5 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1490 , 39 L.Ed.2d 575 (1974); United States v. Clay, 430 F.2d 165 (5 Cir. 1970), rev'd on other grounds, 403 U.S. 698 , 91 S.Ct. 2068 , 29 L.Ed.2d 810 (1971). 4 Contra, Zweibon v. Mitchell, 516 F.2d 594 (D.C.Cir.1975) (dictum in plurality opinion in case involving surveillance of domestic organization having an effect on foreign relations but acting …
discussed
Cited "see"
Jabara v. Kelley
Accord, United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593 (3rd Cir. 1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 881 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 121 (1974); United States v. Smith, 321 F.Supp. 424 (C.D.Cal.1971); United States v. Humphrey, 456 F.Supp. 51 (E.D.Va.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nicholas Sand, United States of America v. Robert Timothy Scully
See United States v. Butenko, 3 Cir., in banc, 1974, 494 F.2d 593, 615-20 (Aldisert, J., concurring), ce rt. denied, 419 U.S. 881 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 121 , which contains the fullest exposition of the facts in Alderman . 6 .
examined
Cited "see"
Bertram Zweibon v. John N. Mitchell, Individually and as Attorney General of the United States of America
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Plurality Opinion, --- U.S.App.D.C. at ---, 516 F.2d at 671 -673 and Opinion of Chief Judge Bazelon. 41 407 U.S. at 309 , 92 S.Ct. at 3132 42 Id. at 308, 92 S.Ct. at 2132 43 See United States v. Abel, 2 Cir., 258 F.2d 485 , aff'd, 362 U.S. 217 , 80 S.Ct. 683 , 4 L.Ed.2d 668 (1960) 44 See United States v. Rosenberg, 195 F.2d 583 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 838 , 73 S.Ct. 20 , 97 L.Ed. 652 (1952) 45 407 U.S. at 314 , 92 S.Ct. at 2135 46 Id. at 313, 92 S.Ct. at 2135 47 Id. at 314, 92 S.Ct. at 2135 48 Ibid 49 Id. at 318-21, 92 S.Ct. 2125 50 Id. at 320 , 92 S.Ct. at 2138 51 Memorandum fro…
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Penn Central Transportation Co.
See In re Penn Central Transportation Co., 494 F.2d 270 , 283 n. 13 (3d Cir. 1974) (Columbus Option), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 , 43 U.S.L.W. 3190 (U.S. Oct. 15, 1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, Debtor. Appeal of Richard Joyce Smith, Trustee of the Property of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, No. 74-1362. Appeal of Bank of New York, No. 74-1447
See In re Penn Central Transportation Co., 494 F.2d 270 , 283 n. 13 (3d Cir. 1974) (Columbus Option), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 , 43 U.S.L.W. 3190 (U.S. Oct. 15, 1974). 5 Appellants' standing to object to the proposed arrangement is entirely dependent upon their status as creditors and stockholders allegedly being subjected to an uncompensated taking by virtue of such erosion.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Greek Radio Network of America, Inc. v. Vlasopoulos
See also United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593, 599-600 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied 419 U.S. 881 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 121 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Burkhart v. Saxbe
See also United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 881 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 121 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bertram Zweibon v. John N. Mitchell, Individually and as Attorney General of the United States
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Butenko, 318 F.Supp. 66 (D.N.J.1970), aff’d, 494 F.2d 593 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 881 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 121 (1974); United States v. Brown, 317 F.Supp. 531 (E.D.La.1970), appeal dismissed, 456 F.2d 1112 (5th Cir.1972) (per curiam), aff’d, 484 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1490 , 39 L.Ed.2d 575 (1974); United States v. Dellinger, No. 69 Cr. 180 (N.D.Ill.1970) (III App. 356); United States v. O’Neal, Cr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Subscription Television v. S & H TV
See, e. g., United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593, 599-600 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 881 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 121 (1974); Reston v. FCC, 492 F.Supp. 697 , 704 n.4 (D.D.C.1980) (quoting Bufalino v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 404 F.2d 1023, 1027 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 987 , 89 S.Ct. 1468 , 22 L.Ed.2d 763 (1969)); United States v. Fuller, supra, 202 F.Supp. at 358 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Subscription Television v. Tv, Jkl
See, e. g., United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593, 599-600 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 881 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 121 (1974); Reston v. FCC, 492 F.Supp. 697 , 704 n.4 (D.D.C.1980) (quoting Bufalino v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 404 F.2d 1023, 1027 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 987 , 89 S.Ct. 1468 , 22 L.Ed.2d 763 (1969)); United States v. Fuller, supra, 202 F.Supp. at 358 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jacquelyn M. Chagnon v. Griffin Bell
See, e. g., United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 881 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 121 (1974); United States v. Brown, 484 F.2d 418, 426 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1490 , 39 L.Ed.2d 575 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul Ajlouny
See, e. g., United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593, 598, 607 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 881 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 121 (1974) (where the question concerns the legality of the taps, the district court has “discretion to grant or deny” requests for disclosure); United States v. Hoffman, 334 F.Supp. 504, 506 (D.D.C.1971) (preliminary determination of whether defendant’s conversations were overheard in violation of Fourth Amendment can be made without an evidentiary hearing); United States v. Brown, 317 F.Supp. 531, 535 (E.D.La. 1970), aff'd, 484 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1973…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, Debtor. Appeal of United States of America. In the Matter of Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, Debtor. Appeal of R. D. Timpany, Trustee of the Property of the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey
See, e. g., In re Penn Central Transportation Co. (Columbus Options), 494 F.2d 270 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Penn Central Transportation Co.
See, e. g., In re Penn Central Transportation Co. (Columbus Options), 494 F.2d 270 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ivanov
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 73-1648.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1974.
Brennan, Certiorari, Consideration, Douglas, Took.
Cited by 15 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.