green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1977 ·
…one who may be discharged 'at the pleasure' of another; i. e., arbitrarily, for no cause whatsoever, simply has no property right to continued employment.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Bowen v. General Motors Corp. AC Spark Plug Division
DeGrace v. Rumsfeld, 614 F.2d 796, 808-11 (1st Cir. 1980); but see Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 250-51 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Walker v. Robbins Hose Fire Co. No. 1, Inc.
But see Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 254 (C.A. 3), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975) (inclusion of future employees is proper provided affirmative relief is considered necessary).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re Lease Oil Antitrust Litigation
adequate representation depends on two factors: (a) the plaintiffs attorney must be qualified, experienced, and generally able to conduct the proposed litigation, and (b) the plaintiff must not have interests antagonistic to those of the class
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mazaleski v. Treusdell
one who may be discharged 'at the pleasure' of another; i. e., arbitrarily, for no cause whatsoever, simply has no property right to continued employment.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mazaleski v. Treusdell
one who may be discharged 'at the pleasure' of another; i. e., arbitrarily, for no cause whatsoever, simply has no property right to continued employment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Binion v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority
Therefore, the class membership period “will commence 300 days prior to the earliest charge filed relevant to a particular class claim.” Movement for Opportunity and Equality, 622 F.2d at 1248 ; see Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Shaw v. Whirlpool Financial Corp. (In Re the Appliance Store, Inc.)
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 247 (3d Cir.), cert. denied. 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guerra v. Scruggs
"A critical element of a claimed invasion of a reputational liberty interest ... is the falsity of the government's asserted basis for the employment decision at issue." Doe v. Garrett, 903 F.2d 1455, 1462-63 (11th Cir.1990); accord Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857, 864 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975) (holding that the government does not infringe upon a person's liberty unless it perpetuates untrue charges); Rich v. Secretary of Army, 735 F.2d 1220, 1227 (10th Cir.1984) (holding that in order to make a showing of liberty deprivation, the employee m…
discussed
Cited "see"
Guerra v. Scruggs
"A critical element of a claimed invasion of a reputational liberty interest ... is the falsity of the government's asserted basis for the employment decision at issue." Doe v. Garrett, 903 F.2d 1455 , 1462-63 (11th Cir.1990); accord Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857, 864 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975) (holding that the government does not infringe upon a person's liberty unless it perpetuates untrue charges); Rich v. Secretary of Army, 735 F.2d 1220, 1227 (10th Cir.1984) (holding that in order to make a showing of liberty deprivation, the employee…
discussed
Cited "see"
May v. Gray
See Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857 , 861 (5th Cir.1974), en banc, cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975); Pauls v. Secretary of the Air Force, 457 F.2d 294, 295 (1st Cir. 1972); Coppedge v. Marsh, 532 F.Supp. *721 423, 429 (D.Kan.1982); Woodward Moore, 451 F.Supp. 346, 347 (D.D.C.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Whittaker v. Philadelphia Electric Co. (In Re Whittaker)
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 , 250-53, (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); and 3B J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bullick v. City of Philadelphia
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 508 F.2d 239, 246 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); Alvarez v. City of Philadelphia, 98 F.R.D. 286 (E.D.Pa.1983); Ulloa v. City of Philadelphia, 95 F.R.D. 109 (E.D.Pa.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gregory Alberico v. The United States
(2×)
See Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857, 861 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bonser v. State of New Jersey
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 247 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975) (citing Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 391 F.2d 555, 562 (2d Cir.1968)).
cited
Cited "see"
Sharp v. Weinberger
See Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857, 860-62 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Walsh v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Casualty Co., 508 F.2d 239, 248-50 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); C.
cited
Cited "see"
Walsh v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Casualty Co., 508 F.2d 239, 248-50 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); C.
cited
Cited "see"
Nethery v. Orr
See Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857, 862-63 (5th Cir.1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Paskel v. Heckler
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Graham v. Three or More Members of the Six Member Army Reserve General Officer Selection Board of 30 November 1979
See Woodard v. Marsh, 658 F.2d 989, 998 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982), (holding that an Army Reserve commissioned officer “has no reasonable expectation of continued employment and thus no property interest protected by the due process clause.” Citing Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857 (5th Cir.1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Graham v. 3 OR MORE MEMBERS ARMY RES. SEL. BD., ETC.
See Woodard v. Marsh, 658 F.2d 989, 998 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982), (holding that an Army Reserve commissioned officer "has no reasonable expectation of continued employment and thus no property interest protected by the due process clause." Citing Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857 (5th Cir.1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975)).
cited
Cited "see"
SHARP, Stanley L. v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, Appellant
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 245 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
National Treasury Employees Union v. Reagan
See Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857, 861-62 (5th Cir. 1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011, 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Laskey v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insur ance Co., 508 F.2d 239 , 253 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); Mungin v. Florida East Coast Ry.
cited
Cited "see"
Laskey v. International Union
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 253 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); Mungin v. Florida East Coast Ry.
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sage Realty Corp.
Under the doctrine of a “continuing violation” a “continuously maintained illegal employment policy may be the subject of a valid complaint until a specified number of days after the last occurrence of an instance of that policy.” Acha v. Beame, 570 F.2d 57, 65 (2d Cir. 1978); accord, Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 246 (3rd Cir.), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); Macklin v. Spector Freight System, Inc., 478 F.2d 979, 986-90 (D.C.Cir.1973).
examined
Cited "see"
Nolvert P. SCOTT, Jr., Appellant, Etc. v. the UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE Et Al.
(4×)
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 243 (3d Cir.), Cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975). 36 The record discloses that Scott was the sole named representative in this case, and that his interests as a faculty member whose contract was subject to renewal were necessarily in conflict with those of applicants for positions on the University faculty.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ligon v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 (3d Cir.) cert. den’d., 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); Davis v. Weir, 497 F.2d 139 (5th Cir. 1974); Gonzales v. Cassidy, 474 F.2d 67 (5th Cir. 1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Bennett v. Tarquin
See Sims v. Fox, 492 F.2d 1088 , rehearing en banc, 505 F.2d 857 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Garcia v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 246 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 416 F.2d at 719-20 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings in the Airline Cases
Accord, Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 246 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); Terry v. Bridgeport Brass Co., supra at 808; Collins v. United Air Lines, Inc., 514 F.2d 594, 596-97 (9th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1513, 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8586 in Re Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings in the Airline Cases. Appeal of American Airlines, Inc., and Trans World Airlines, Inc
Accord, Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 246 (3d Cir.), Cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); Terry v. Bridgeport Brass Co., supra at 808; Collins v. United Air Lines, Inc., 514 F.2d 594, 596-97 (9th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Rizzo
The category pertains even though, as in this case, damages are sought as well as equitable relief. 3B Moore’s, supra, ¶| 23.40[4]; see Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 , 250-53 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Whack v. Peabody & Wind Engineering Co.
Rivers v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 451 F.Supp. 44 at 47-48 (E.D.Pa.1978); see, Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Company, 508 F.2d 239, 258-59 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); cf. McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 802, n. 13 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Peterson v. Lehigh Valley District Council
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 , 246 n.8 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); Bates v. Western Electric, 420 F.Supp. 521 (E.D.Pa.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Woodward v. Moore
See Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975); Knehans v. Callaway, 403 F.Supp. 290 (D.D.C.1975); see also Kennedy v. Secretary of Navy, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 39 , 401 F.2d 990 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Hoard v. Teletype Corp.
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Wells v. General Electric Co.
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 , 246 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); Davis v. Romney, 490 F.2d 1360, 1366 (3d Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Peter W. Colm and John M. McIntyre v. Cyrus R. Vance, Secretary of State, U. S. Department of State
(2×)
See Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857, 861-62 (5th Cir. 1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
15 Fair empl.prac.cas. 998, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7777 Joanne Glus v. G. C. Murphy Company, Appellee-Cross and Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Local 940, and International Union of Wholesale and Department Store Union, Afl-Cio, Appellant-Cross
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 , 246 n. 8 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Aznavorian v. Califano
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 289, 247 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Glus v. G. C. Murphy Co.
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 , 246 n. 8 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Croker v. Boeing Co.(Vertol Div.)
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 , 246 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Groves v. Insurance Co. of North America
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 , 250 (3d Cir.) cert. denied 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975) (sex discrimination); Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 416 F.2d 711, 719 (7th Cir. 1969); Jenkins v. United Gas Corp., 400 F.2d 28, 34 (5th Cir. 1968); Oatis v. Crown Zellerbach Corp., 398 F.2d 496, 499 (5th Cir. 1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Coppotelli v. Howlett
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual, 508 F.2d 239 (3d Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 .
discussed
Cited "see"
13 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1352, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,232 Western Electric Company, Incorporated v. Honorable Herbert J. Stern, United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey, Nominal Kyriaki Cleo Kyriazi, Plaintiff-Respondent
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975). 15 Western's request must be rejected since it has failed to show the clear abuse of discretion required for relief under the All Writs Act.
cited
Cited "see"
Western Electric Co. v. Stern
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Freeman v. Motor Convoy, Inc.
(2×)
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239 (3rd Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp.
See Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 257 (3d Cir. 1975) cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975); Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co., 495 F.2d 398 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 989 , 95 S.Ct. 1421 , 43 L.Ed.2d 669 (1975); Parham v. Southwestern Bell Tel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Douglas v. Evans
More importantly in this case, even assuming that Ms. Douglas was stigmatized by Mr. Evans’ action, she must, “in order to establish a violation of the due *1549 process clause, [provide evidence] that the stigmatizing fact was ‘substantially false.’” McElwee v. Todd, 581 F.2d 1182, 1184 (5th Cir.1978) (quoting Codd v. Velger, 429 U.S. 624, 627 , 97 S.Ct. 882, 884 , 51 L.Ed.2d 92 (1977)); see also Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857, 864 (11th Cir.1974) (en banc) (Basic proposition is that the government has not infringed liberty unless it perpetuates untrue charges), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 10…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines
v.
Gilstrap
v.
Gilstrap
No. 74-1239.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
Jun 9, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2) · S.D. Texas (1)
Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied.