Freeman v. United States, 419 U.S. 996 (1974). · Go Syfert
Search
Freeman v. United States, 419 U.S. 996 (1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “exhaustion by at least one member of the class is a necessary prerequisite for a class action”
118 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 44 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Fort Stanton Hospital & Training School (nmd, 1990-12-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Fort Stanton Hospital & Training School
D.N.M. · 1990 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
exhaustion by at least one member of the class is a necessary prerequisite for a class action
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Emma J. Craigg, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Albert P. Russo, Director, Department of Human Resources
D.C. Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
it is generally agreed that exhaustion by at least one member of the class is a necessary prerequisite for a class action
discussed Cited "see" Strykers Bay Neighborhood Council, Inc. v. City of New York
S.D.N.Y. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Phillips v. Klassen, 502 F.2d 362, 366 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974) (class action inappropriate when interests of named plaintiff are antagonistic to class members) (cited with approval in Hagans v. Wyman, 527 F.2d 1151, 1154 (2d Cir.1975)).
discussed Cited "see" Andor v. United Air Lines, Inc. (2×)
Or. Ct. App. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bibler v. Young, 492 F.2d 1351 (6th Cir.), cert. den. 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Fielder v. State
Tex. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yates v. State, 509 S.W.2d 600 (Tex. Crim.App.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 310 , 42 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974); Baker v. State, 368 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.Crim.App.1963); and Washburn v. State, 167 Tex.Crim. 125 , 318 S.W.2d 627 (1958).
cited Cited "see" Lawson v. Metropolitan Sanitary District
N.D. Ill. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Phillips v. Klassen, 502 F.2d 362, 369 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster, Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster
D.C. Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Phillips v. Klassen, 502 F.2d 362, 369 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974); League of United Latin American Citizens v. Hampton, 501 F.2d 843 , 847 & n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1974); Marrone v. INS, 500 F.2d 418 , 420 (2d Cir.1974) (per curiam).
discussed Cited "see" Feldstein v. Christian Science Monitor
D. Mass. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, 485 F.Supp. 255, 260 (N.D.Tex. 1980); see King’s Garden, Inc. v. F.C.C., 498 F.2d 51, 55-57 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
cited Cited "see" cadc 1980
D.C. Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See King's Garden, Inc. v. FCC, 498 F.2d 51, 56 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
cited Cited "see" CBS, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See King’s Garden, Inc. v. FCC, 498 F.2d 51, 56 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
cited Cited "see" Rodgers v. Atencio
Colo. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Phillips v. Klassen, 502 F.2d 362 (D.C.Cir.) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
cited Cited "see" Richardson v. Coopers & Lybrand
D.D.C. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Phillips v. Klassen, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 360, 364 , 502 F.2d 362 , 366 cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Jose F. Olivares v. Winston Martin, Director, San Antonio Development Corp.
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Phillips v. Klassen, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 502 F.2d 362 , 369, cert, denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
cited Cited "see" Gray v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
D.D.C. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Phillips v. Klassen, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 502 F.2d 362, 367 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974); Davis v. Weir, 497 F.2d 139, 147 (5th Cir. 1974).
discussed Cited "see" Carlos E. Sanchez v. Gordon W. Heggie, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary
10th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reicin, 497 F.2d 563 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 ; United States v. Kubitsky, 469 F.2d 1253 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 908 , 93 S.Ct. 1536 , 36 L.Ed.2d 198 . 3 .
cited Cited "see" Seiden v. Nicholson
N.D. Ill. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Phillips v. Klassen, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 502 F.2d 362, 366 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Schnorbach v. Fuqua
S.D. Ga. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Section E, infra. A remedies conflict from outside the securities area is found in Phillips v. Klassen, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 502 F.2d 362 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" Ray C. Imel v. United States
10th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wiles v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 10 Cir., 499 F.2d 255, 257 , cert. denied 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 310 , 42 L.Ed.2d 270 , and Mills v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 10 Cir., 442 F.2d 1149, 1151 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gustavo Holguin
7th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Soteras, 770 F.2d 641, 646 (7th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Reicin, 497 F.2d 563, 569 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ronald Fink v. National Savings and Trust Company (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Phillips v. Klassen, 502 F.2d 362, 366-67 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974) (affirming district court's denial of class certification because there was some likelihood of conflicts among class representatives). 61 The majority opinion also faults the District Court, however, for "provid[ing] no indication that [it] even considered the possibility of subclasses or of certifying a narrower class, to avoid a potential conflict between the interests of current employees and those of past employees." Maj.op. at 960.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rivcom Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board (2×)
Cal. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
(See Columbus Janitor Service (1971) 191 N.L.R.B. 902 , 910-911; see also Rushton & Mercier Woodworking Co. (1973) 203 N.L.R.B. 123 , 125-126, enforced (1st Cir.1974) 502 F.2d 1160 , cert. den., 419 U.S. 996 [ 42 L.Ed.2d 270 , 95 S.Ct. 310 ].) (4c) Great Dane aside, common sense supports the Board's argument that it could infer bad motive from the lack of credibility in Harris' explanations.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nguyen Da Yen v. Kissinger
N.D. Cal. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Phillips v. Klassen, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 502 F.2d 362, 366-367 (1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (retired post office employees contesting premature retirement on grounds of coercion had interests which conflicted with those retired employees who were happy with early retirement); Schy v. Susquehanna Corp., 419 F.2d 1112, 1117 (7th Cir. 1970) cert. den. 400 U.S. 826 , 91 S.Ct. 51 , 27 L.Ed.2d 55 (shareholders opposing a merger versus the 80% of the stockholders who voted in favor of the issuance of stock to effect the merger); Carroll v. American Fe…
Freeman
v.
United States
No. 74-11.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 11, 1974.
419 U.S. 996
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1) · D. New Mexico (1)

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.