green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McKinnon Bridge Co., Inc.
See United States v. Green, 494 F.2d 820, 827 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 280 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Terrell Knight and A. C. Brown, A/K/A Cadillac
United States v. Schaffer, 599 F.2d 678, 680 (5th Cir. 1979); see United States v. Green, 494 F.2d 820, 822, n.4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 280 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Stubbs v. Harris
See McDonald v. State of Arkansas (8th Cir. 1974) 501 F.2d 385 , cert. den. 419 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 280 ; Perry v. State of Texas (5th Cir. 1972) 456 F.2d 879 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Babbitt Ford, Inc.
See Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974), holding that prejudgment self-help repossession authorized by state statute does not involve “state action.” 4 . 28 U.S.C. § 1738 (1966) provides in part: “The Acts of the legislature of any State, Territory, or Possession of the United States or copies thereof, shall be authenticated by affixing the sale of such State, Territory or Possession thereto.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilbert Parks v. \Mr. Ford\" D/B/A Ford's Speed Shop William Muldowney
See 218 Kan. at 147-148 , 542 P.2d at 1046 11 The distinction between liens created by law and liens created by private contract permitted by law was recognized by the Ninth Circuit in Culbertson v. Leland, 528 F.2d 426, 429 (9th Cir. 1975), in distinguishing its holding in Adams v. Southern California State National Bank, 492 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974), that contractual self-help repossession did not involve state action Candor requires the disclosure that the author of this opinion has always contended that Gibbs v. Titelman w…
discussed
Cited "see"
Carlos Melara v. James J. Kennedy
See Culbertson v. Leland, 528 F.2d 426, 431 (1975), and Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F.2d 324, 330 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph Bear Killer, Jr.
See McDonald v. State of Arkansas, 501 F.2d 385, 388 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 280 (1974); United States v. Burden, 497 F.2d 385, 387 (8th Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terry L. Arcoren v. Wenton Peters and John Schooler
(2×)
Since then, however, the courts have almost uniformly upheld statutes allowing a creditor to proceed by self-help. 4 In Bichel Optical Laboratories, Inc. v. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis, 487 F.2d 906 (8th Cir.1973), this court distinguished the state action involved in the Fuentes replevin procedure from the U.C.C.’s self-help remedy, which “involve[s] only private actions arising out of the express written agreements between the parties.” Id. at 907; see also Adams v. Southern Cal. First Nat'l Bank, 492 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1973), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lopez v. Richards
See, e.g., United States v. Green, 494 F.2d 820, 823-24 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 280 (1974); United States v. Mandell, 591 F.2d 1347 , 1361 (4th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 445 U.S. 1961 , 100 S.Ct. 1647 , 64 L.Ed.2d 236 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sam Goody, Inc.
The intention of the legislature to repeal ‘must be clear and manifest.’ ” United States v. Borden, 308 U.S. 188, 198-99 , 60 S.Ct. 182, 188-189 , 84 L.Ed. 181 (1939), quoting Red Rock v. Henry, 106 U.S. 596, 601-02 , 1 S.Ct. 434, 438-439 , 27 L.Ed. 251 (1883), (citations omitted); see also United States v. Green, 494 F.2d 820 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 280 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
De Malherbe v. International Union of Elevator Constructors
See also Adams v. Southern California Nat'l Bank, 492 F.2d 324, 338 (9 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , *664 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974); Hines v. Cenla Community Action Comm., Inc., 474 F.2d 1052, 1059 (5 Cir. 1973) (Wisdom, J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawson v. Smith
See also Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F.2d 324, 330 (9 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974) (test for “state action” is whether action of the state is “significant”), decided subsequent to Garfinkle .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McDonald
v.
Arkansas
v.
Arkansas
No. 74-5257.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 11, 1974.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.