green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.5 score
“kimball 1510 /”
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Klamath Claims Committee v. United States
See Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1019 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974) (explaining that the Tribes’s hunting, fishing, and water rights survived the Termination Act); Kimball v. Callahan, 590 F.2d 768, 770-71 (9th Cir. 1979) (discussing which members of the Tribes could exercise tribal fishing rights after termination); United States v. Adair, 723 F.2d 1394, 1418 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984) (addressing how the Tribes could effect a transfer of the hunting and fishing rights it retained …
discussed
Cited "see"
Klamath Tribe Claims Committee v. United States
See Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1019 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974) (treaty-reserved hunting and fishing rights on former reservation lands survived termination); United States v. Adair, 723 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984) (same as to implied reserved water rights).
discussed
Cited "see"
Klamath Tribe Claims Committee v. United States
See Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1019 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974) (treaty-reserved hunting and fishing rights on former reservation lands survived termination); United States v. Adair, 723 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3536 , 82 L.Ed.2d 841 (1984) (same as to implied reserved water rights).
cited
Cited "see"
Juan Segundo v. City of Rancho Mirage, a Municipal Corporation, Jean Chormicle Kapp v. City of Cathedral City, California
See Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564, 565 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1019 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sac And Fox Tribe Of The Mississippi In Iowa v. Les Licklider
See Iowa Code §§ 109.32 , 109.119 9 See Youngbear v. Brewer, 415 F.Supp. 807 (N.D.Iowa 1976) 10 See Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564, 567-69 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1019 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974)
cited
Cited "see"
Sac & Fox Tribe v. Licklider
See Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564, 567-69 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1019 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Ishizaki Kisen Company, Ltd. v. United States of America, Ishizaki Kisen Company, Ltd. v. United States
See Reliable Transfer Co., Inc. v. United States, 497 F.2d 1036 (2d Cir.), cert. granted, 419 U.S. 1018 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 291 (1974). 7 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. State of Minn.
See also Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564, 566-69 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1019 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota
See also Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564, 566-69 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1019 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LAC COURTE OREILLES BAND OF INDIANS v. Wisconsin
See, e.g., Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564, 565 (9th cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1019 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974) (specific treaty provision reserving Klamath Indians' exclusive right to fish could be read as not reserving a right to hunt if it were not for evidence of "highly significant role that hunting and trapping played (and continue to play) in the lives of the Klamaths").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Wisconsin
See, e.g., Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564, 565 (9th cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1019 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974) (specific treaty provision reserving Klamath Indians’ exclusive right to fish could be read as not reserving a right to hunt if it were not- for evidence of “highly significant role that hunting and trapping played (and continue to play) in the lives of the Klamaths”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. State of Mich.
See also Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1019 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974), and State v. Tinno, 94 Idaho 759 , 497 P.2d 1386 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michigan
See also Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1019 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974), and State v. Tinno, 94 Idaho 759 , 497 P.2d 1386 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Forge
See, also, Kimball v. Callahan, 493 F.2d 564 (9 Cir.), certiorari denied, 419 U.S. 1019 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974); 4 American Indian L.Rev. 121.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J. R. Williston & Beane, Inc. v. Haack
See, e. g., Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange, 498 F.2d 1303 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. granted, 419 U.S. 1018 , 95 S.Ct. 491 , 42 L.Ed.2d 291 (1974); Thill Securities Corp. v. New York Stock Exchange, 433 F.2d 264 (7th Cir. 1970); Abbott Securities Corp. v. New York Stock Exchange, 384 F.Supp. 668 (D.D.C. 1974); Fredrickson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 389 F.Supp. 1151 (N.D.Ill.1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Callahan
v.
Kimball
v.
Kimball
No. 73-1575.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 18, 1974.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.