green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.7 score
“the seventh amendment right to trial by jury does not survive a default judgment”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Cravero
But cf. United States v. Frick, 490 F.2d 666, 670-71 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 831 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (suggesting that a "staged arrest" after indictment to apprehend defendant when he has evidence in his possession is permissible so long as the arrest occurs within a reasonable time after indictment, but noting that the evidence failed to show that the arrest was staged) 17 The informant had never ascertained the hiding place of the cocaine 18 Based on a phone conversation at 11:20 that night in which Cravero told the informant that he had detected the presence…
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Cravero
But cf. United States v. Frick, 490 F.2d 666, 670-71 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 831 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (suggesting that a “staged arrest” after indictment to apprehend defendant when he has evidence in his possession is permissible so long as the arrest occurs within a reasonable time after indictment, but noting that the evidence failed to show that the arrest was staged). .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Frankart Distributors, Inc. v. Levitz
the seventh amendment right to trial by jury does not survive a default judgment
cited
Cited "see"
Nike Incorporated v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc., Brooks Shoe, Inc., and Brooks Sports, Inc.
See Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.) (upholding default judgment based upon an oral order to produce documents), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
R.W. International Corp. And T. H. Ward De La Cruz, Inc. v. Welch Foods, Inc. And Magna Trading Corp.
See Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.) (where oral proceedings clearly require litigant to produce certain documents, absence of written order does not pre-elude imposing default judgment for failure to comply), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mario Eufrasio, A/K/A Murph, United States of America v. Santo Idone, A/K/A Sam, A/K/A Sam From Chester, A/K/A Papa, A/K/A Big Santo, United States of America v. Gary S. Iacona
See United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765, 778-79 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983). 17 "[J]oinder ... of a conspiracy count and substantive counts arising out of the conspiracy [is permitted], since the claim of conspiracy provides a common link, and demonstrates the existence of a common scheme or plan." United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 729-730 (3d Cir.) (emphasis in Somers, quoting Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Sec. 144), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 57, 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974). 78 We agree with the Sec…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eufrasio
See United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765, 778-79 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983). 17 “[Jjoinder ... of a conspiracy count and substantive counts arising out of the conspiracy [is permitted], since the claim of conspiracy provides a common link, and demonstrates the existence of a common scheme or plan.” United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 729-730 (3d Cir.) (emphasis in Somers , quoting Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 144), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 57, 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernstein v. Fernandez
(2×)
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 737-739 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis Anthony Rivera
(2×)
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 743-44 (3d Cir.) (reviewing history of law regarding variances from the indictment and amendments to the indictment), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Frederick Forte
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 742 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Joseph, Emmanuel
United, States v. Kravitz, 281 F.2d 581, 587 (3d Cir.1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 941 , 81 S.Ct. 459 , 5 L.Ed.2d 372 (1961); accord United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 736 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974); United States v. LeFevre, 483 F.2d 477, 478 (3d Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Professional Seminar Consultants, Inc., a Corporation v. Sino American Technology Exchange Council, Inc., and G.Y. Lin
(2×)
See Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gigli
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Courier-Citizen Company v. Boston Electrotypers Union No. 11, International Printing & Graphic Communications Union of North America
See Sperry Systems Management Division v. NLRB, 492 F.2d 63 , 68 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 831 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickens, Albert, United States of America v. Pittman, Fred, Jr., United States of America v. Washington, James, United States of America v. Persons, Lonnie, United States of America v. Upshaw, Dewey, United States of America v. Cooper, Robert, Robert Cooper, A/K/A Mubarak Rai Ali, United States of America v. Monroe, Keith, United States of America v. Conerly, Alvin, Alvin Conerly, Also Known as Hijr, United States of America v. Lawson, Willie Lee, Willie Lee Lawson, A/K/A Acqueel, United States of America v. Grey, Claude, Ahmed Muhammad, A/K/A Claude Grey, United States of America v. Skinner, Raymond, Raymond Skinner, Also Known as Rafeeq, United States of America v. Thompson, Walton Earl, United States of America v. Clark, James, United States of America v. Brunson, James, United States of America v. Kreps, Sheldon, United States of America v. Moses, Rosco, United States of America v. Dickens, Ronald
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickens
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mattie Doll Simmons, United States of America v. Maurice Brown
(2×)
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 730 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charter House Insurance Brokers, Ltd., and Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. New Hampshire Insurance Company, and Counter-Plaintiff-Third Party v. United States of America, Third Party
Accord, Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir. 1974), certiorari denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 ("Where oral proceedings unequivocally give a litigant notice that certain documents are to be produced, the absence of a written order does not preclude the entry of a default judgment for failure to comply.").
discussed
Cited "see"
Charter House Insurance Brokers, Ltd. v. New Hampshire Insurance
Accord, Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir. 1974), certiorari denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (“Where oral proceedings unequivocally give a litigant notice that certain documents are to be produced, the absence of a written order does not preclude the entry of a default judgment for failure to comply.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert L. Herring, and Jerry D. Dorminey
See United States v. Bryant, 490 F.2d 1372, 1377 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 57 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harvey Birdman, United States of America v. William Richman
See authorities cited in note 35, supra. See generally United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 737 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974): 37 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Ochs
(2×)
See United States v. Frick, 490 F.2d 666, 669-70 (5 Cir. 1973), Cert. denied, 419 U.S. 831 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974); United States v. Evans, 481 F.2d 990, 994 (9 Cir. 1973).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sinclair
See United States v. Somer, 496 F.2d 723 , 737 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenny Derosa A/K/A Pup, in No. 76-1642 Appeal of Brando Rosetta, in No. 76-1643
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 , 736-39 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974); United States v. Leftwich, 461 F.2d 586, 590 (3d Cir. 1972) cert. denied, 409 U.S. 915 , 93 S.Ct. 247 , 34 L.Ed.2d 178 (1972); United States v. Turner, 409 F.2d 102, 103-04 (3d Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Max H. Homer A/K/A Max H. Homer, Jr.
Accord, United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 737 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974): “[W]e will reverse upon demonstrations of prosecutorial misconduct only in those situations in which prejudice inures to the defendant from the challenged improprieties.” Our awareness of the nature of opening and closing arguments in an adversary proceeding and our concern for judicial administration preclude us from setting aside a verdict and ordering a new trial every time an advocate is verbally indiscreet unless his remarks are obviously prejudicial.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Telesforo Ray Gomez, and Cayetano Morin-Degollado
(2×)
See United States v. Bryant, 490 F.2d 1372, 1378 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 57 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frumento
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 , 731 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974); Byrd v. Wainwright, 428 F.2d 1017 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. Crisona, 271 F.Supp. 150, 154 (S.D.N.Y. 1967).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Ford v. State of New Jersey
Accord, United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 (3d Cir. 1974), cert. denied 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fujimoto v. Au
See also Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (Rule 37(b) sanction upheld where district court orally had ordered defendant to produce records, since “[w]here oral proceedings unequivocally give a litigant notice that certain documents are to be produced, the absence of a written order does not preclude the entry of a default judgment for failure to comply.”); Jones v. Uris Sales Corp., 373 F.2d 644, 646-47 (2d Cir.1967) (proceedings in judge’s chambers, where judge announced that he would give counsel twenty-fou…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Payne v. Dewitt
(2×)
See also Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974)(after a default judgment has been entered under FRCP 37(b)(2), a party has no right to jury trial under either FRCP 55(b)(2), which authorizes a district court to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine the amount of damages, or to the Seventh-Amendment protection); see also Paul Mogin, Why Judges, Not Juries, Should Set Punitive Damages, 65 U. of Ch.L.Rev. 179 (1998). [19] State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Unigard Security Insurance Company v. Lakewood Engineering & Manufacturing Corporation
See, e.g., Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (Rule 37 sanctions may be imposed on a party for disobedience to a court's request in oral proceedings, so long as those proceedings give the party unequivocal notice that a court has asked that certain documents be produced.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Unigard Security Insurance v. Lakewood Engineering & Manufacturing Corp.
See, e.g., Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (Rule 37 sanctions may be imposed on a party for disobedience to a court’s request in oral proceedings, so long as those proceedings give the party unequivocal notice that a court has asked that certain documents be produced.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Halaco Engineering Co. v. Costle
See e.g., Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (noting that an order triggering Rule 37(b)(2) may be oral). 17 No order was issued by the court below under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(C).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Halaco Engineering Co. v. Costle
See e.g., Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (noting that an order triggering Rule 37(b)(2) may be oral).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tamari v. Bache & Co. Lebanon)
See also Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (Rule 37(b) sanction upheld where district court orally had ordered defendant to produce records, since "[w]here oral proceedings unequivocally give a litigant notice that certain documents are to be produced, the absence of a written order does not preclude the entry of a default judgment for failure to comply."); Jones v. Uris Sales Corp., 373 F.2d 644, 646-47 (2d Cir.1967) (proceedings in judge's chambers, where judge announced that he would give counsel twenty-four hour…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L.
See also Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (Rule 37(b) sanction upheld where district court orally had ordered defendant to produce records, since “[wjhere oral proceedings unequivocally give a litigant notice that certain documents are to be produced, the absence of a written order does not preclude the entry of a default judgment for failure to comply.”); Jones v. Uris Sales Corp., 373 F.2d 644, 646-47 (2d Cir.1967) (proceedings in judge’s chambers, where judge announced that he would give counsel twenty-fou…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hooks v. State
See, e. g., United States v. Somers, 3d Cir., 496 F.2d 723 (1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974); United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co., 2d Cir., 155 F.2d 631 (1946); United States v. De Vasto, 2d Cir., 52 F.2d 26 (1931), cert. den. 284 U.S. 678 , 52 S.Ct. 138 , 76 L.Ed. 573 (1931); United States v. Brisco, D.Del., 473 F.Supp. 303 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peifer
See also United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 , 740 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974), United States v. Benson, 487 F.2d 978, 981 (3d Cir. 1973), United States v. Schartner, 426 F.2d 470, 477 (3d Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Russell Greenfield, M.D.
There is no necessity for synonymity but there must be substantial relevancy for purposes other than to show the probability that the person committed the offense being tried because he is a man of criminal character.” United States v. Kasouris, 474 F.2d 689, 692 (5th Cir. 1973); see also United States v. Bryant, 490 F.2d 1372, 1377 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 57 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Laing
v.
Minnesota Vikings Football Club, Inc.
v.
Minnesota Vikings Football Club, Inc.
No. 73-1716.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1974.
Cited by 162 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.