green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Mannarino
But see United States v. Harris, 368 F.Supp. 697, 709 (E.D.Penn.1973) (“Notwithstanding the coop *66 erative law enforcement effort of the Federal and state authorities, the fact of the matter is that the reports in question were compiled by the city police officers, submitted as a matter of course to their superiors in the police department, and are now (and were at the time of trial) in the lawful possession and control of the Philadelphia Police Department”), aff 'd 498 F.2d 1164 (3d Cir.), cert, den., 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 665 (1974).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. William McKnight
(2×)
See, e. g., Stirling v. Chemical Bank, 511 F.2d 1030 (2d Cir. 1975); Craig v. Garrison, 549 F.2d 306 (4th Cir. 1977); United States v. Umfress, 562 F.2d 359 (5th Cir. 1977); Reed v. Michigan, 398 F.2d 800 (6th Cir. 1968); Seshachalam v. Creighton University School of Medicine, 545 F.2d 1147 (8th Cir. 1976); United States v. Stolarz, 547 F.2d 108 (9th Cir. 1976); Alley v. Dodge Hotel, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 320 , 501 F.2d 880 (1974); but see Brainerd v. Beal, 498 F.2d 901 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Curcio
See United States v. Piet, 498 F.2d 178, 181 (7th Cir.) (defendant assumed risk that consenter would permit search when he gave consenter possession of keys to warehouse), cert. denied sub nom., Markham v. United States, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Graves
See U.S. v. Harris, 498 F.2d 1164 (3rd Cir.) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 665 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Byrne
United States v. Mayer, 556 F.2d 245, 249 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Onori, 535 F.2d 938, 945 (5th Cir. 1976); United States v. Starks, 515 F.2d 112, 119 (3d Cir. 1975); See United States v. Harris, 498 F.2d 1164 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 665 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry Bynum, Jr.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Harris, 498 F.2d 1164, 1169 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 665 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Carpenter
See United States v. Harris, 498 F.2d 1164 (3rd Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 665 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frumento
See United States v. Harris, 368 F.Supp. 697, 705 (E.D.Pa. 1973), aff’d, 498 F.2d 1164 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 665 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arthur Theodore Towne Dane Joseph Treiber
See Riddle v. Dyche, 262 U.S. 333, 336 , 43 S.Ct. 555, 556 , 67 L.Ed. 1009 (1923) (“The power to inquire into facts outside the record, allowed under some circumstances, cannot be extended to such as are inconsistent with the record.”); see also Brainerd v. Beal, 498 F.2d 901, 902 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974); Chick v. Wingo, 387 F.2d 330, 330-31 (6th Cir.1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Home Indemnity Co. v. Arapahoe Drilling Co.
Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice II 204.02[1], at 4-13 (2d ed. 1992); see also Brainerd v. Beal, 498 F.2d 901, 903 (7th Cir.) (purpose of requiring compliance with rule on timely notice of appeal is to avoid uncertainty), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sonja Yvette Osunegbu
See supra note 12. 14 . 519 F.2d 1078 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1060 , 96 S.Ct. 797 , 46 L.Ed.2d 651 (1976); see also United States v. Piet, 498 F.2d 178, 181 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Charles Richardson
See United States v. Williams, 545 F.2d 1036 (6th Cir.1976); United States v. Spivey, 448 F.2d 390 (4th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 927 , 92 S.Ct. 976 , 30 L.Ed.2d 799 (1972); Dunson v. United States, 404 F.2d 447 (9th Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 393 U.S. 1111 , 89 S.Ct. 925 , 21 L.Ed.2d 808 (1969); United States v. Wora, 246 F.2d 283 (2d Cir.1957); see also United States v. Piet, 498 F.2d 178 (7th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Markham v. United States, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974) (distinguishing Manuszak). 3 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fase v. Seafarers Welfare And Pension Plan
See also Brainerd v. Beal, 498 F.2d 901, 903 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fase v. Seafarers Welfare & Pension Plan
See also Brainerd v. Beal, 498 F.2d 901, 903 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brainerd
v.
Beal
v.
Beal
No. 74-145.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 1974.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.