Phelps v. United States, 419 U.S. 1068 (1974). · Go Syfert
Search
Phelps v. United States, 419 U.S. 1068 (1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
63 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Jones (pa, 1992-05-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Jones (2×)
Pa. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136, 148-50 , 318 A.2d 680, 687-88 (1974) (adequacy of curative instructions), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Morris (2×)
Pa. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136 , 318 A.2d 680 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974) (improper comment by the Commonwealth cured by immediate cautionary instruction and jury charge).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Clark (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136 , 318 A.2d 680 , appeal dismissed, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974) (defendant is not entitled to a perfectly conducted trial so long as he has been accorded a fair trial by an impartial jury).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Henderson
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Stoltzfus, 462 Pa. 43 , 337 A.2d 873 , appeal dismissed, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 (1975) (no error in refusing specific instruction covered by general charge); Commonwealth v. Perry, supra (same).
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Stoltzfus
Pa. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136 , 318 A.2d 680 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974). 3 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Story (2×)
Pa. · 1978 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136 , 160 n.15, 318 A.2d 680 , 693 n.15, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 , 95 S.Ct. 651 (1974) (error harmless if harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); Commonwealth v. Davis, 455 Pa. 466, 467 , 317 A.2d 218, 218 (1974) (per curiam) (same); Commonwealth v. Canales, 454 Pa. 422, 428 , 311 A.2d 572, 575 (1973) (error not harmless in case where erroneously admitted evidence corroborated testimony "critical to the prosecution" and disputed by the defendant); Commonwealth v. Ravenell, 448 Pa. 162 , 292 A.2d 365 (1972) (error harmless where …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Bullard
Pa. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136 , 160 n. 15, 318 A.2d 680 , 693 n. 15, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); Commonwealth v. Davis, 455 Pa. 466, 467 , 317 A.2d 218 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Piper (2×)
Pa. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136 , 150 n.10, 318 A.2d 680 , 688 n.10, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S. Ct. 651 (1974); Commonwealth v. Yount, 455 Pa. 303, 318-19 , 314 A.2d 242, 250 (1974); Commonwealth v. Jennings, 442 Pa. 18, 24 , 274 A.2d 767, 770 (1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Phelps, Receiver in Bankruptcy
v.
United States
No. 74-121.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 1974.
419 U.S. 1068
Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1, 2, and 3 presented by the petition which read as follows:

1. “Whether the Court of Appeals incorrectly granted to the United States a priority based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 for taxes in violation of and contrary to the priorities for payment of claims established by the Bankruptcy Act?”

2. “Whether the Court of Appeals incorrectly held that service of a Notice of Levy upon an assignee for the benefit of creditors subsequent to the assignment reduced the bankrupt’s property then held by the assignee to the constructive possession of the United States?”

3. “Whether the Court of Appeals incorrectly determined that the Bankruptcy Court lacked summary jurisdiction to adjudicate the controversy before it without the consent of the United States?”