green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Marie Lucie Jean, Lucien Louis, Cross-Appellants, State of Florida, Intervenor-Appellant v. Alan C. Nelson, Cross-Appellees
See Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Standard Forge and Axle Company, Inc., 496 F.2d 1392 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1106 , 95 S.Ct. 776 , 42 L.Ed.2d 801 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Papakonstantinou Ex Rel. Papakonstantinou v. Civiletti
Accord Dunn v. INS, 499 F.2d 856, 859 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1106 , 95 S.Ct. 776 , 42 L.Ed.2d 801 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Peter Richard Bowe v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
(Citations omitted.) 4 Nicholas v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 590 F.2d 802, 808 (9th Cir. 1979); See Dunn v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 499 F.2d 856, 857-58 (9th Cir. 1974), Cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1106 , 95 S.Ct. 776 , 42 L.Ed.2d 801 (1975); Arias-Uribe v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 466 F.2d 1198, 1199-1200 (9th Cir. 1972). 5 Bowe acknowledges that he is deportable under § 1251(a)(11).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony Philip Vissian v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
This position was apparently based on the decision of the Board in Matter of Arias-Uribe, 13 I. & N. Dec. 696 (1971), aff’d per curiam Arias-Uribe v. INS, 9 Cir., 466 F.2d 1198 ; accord Dunn v. INS, 9 Cir., 499 F.2d 856 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1106 , 95 S.Ct. 776 , 42 L.Ed.2d 801 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Jeffrey Steinberg
See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Rovner), 377 F.Supp. 954, 955 (E.D.Penn.) (“It is inconceivable that an act which would not make one a witness against himself would make him a witness against another”), aff'd, 500 F.2d 1400 (3d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1106 , 95 S.Ct. 776 , 42 L.Ed.2d 802 (1975); see also United States v. McKeon, 558 F.Supp. 1243 (E.D.N.Y.1983) (compelled production of handwriting exemplars which incriminate spouse non-testimonial).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Citro Florida, Inc., a Florida Corporation v. Citrovale, S.A., a Foreign Corporation
(2×)
See, e.g., Hormel v. Helvering, 1941, 312 U.S. 552 , 61 S.Ct. 719 , 85 L.Ed. 1037 ," Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Standard Forge & Axle Co., Inc., 496 F.2d 1392, 1394 (5th Cir.1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 1106 , 95 S.Ct. 776 , 42 L.Ed.2d 801 (1975); Thomas v. J.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McKeon
See also In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Rovner, 377 F.Supp. 954 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d mem, 500 F.2d 1400 (3d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1106 , 95 S.Ct. 776 , 42 L.Ed.2d 802 (1975). 1 Thus, given the United States Supreme Court’s view that handwriting exemplars (as opposed to the content of same) are neither communicative nor testimonial, it follows that the marital adverse testimony privilege does not preclude a Rule 17(c) subpoena therefor.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ernest Francis v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See also Dunn v. INS, 499 F.2d 856, 858 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1106 , 95 S.Ct. 776 , 42 L.Ed.2d 801 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dunn
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 74-321.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1975.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. • Certiorari denied.