green
Positive treatment
7.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Ray Polk
(2×)
See United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Woodbury Baker, United States of America v. Timothy Blackwell
(2×)
See United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376, 379 (5th Cir.1974), ce rt. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Church
See United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Javier Valencia and Ivan Dario Martinez-Valencia
See Martinez’ Br. at 28 (quoting United States v. Green, 511 F.2d 1062, 1072 (7th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir.1974), ce rt. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975)), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1031 , 96 S.Ct. 561 , 562, 46 L.Ed.2d 404 , 405 (1975)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Darby
(2×)
A substantial step is "conduct that is strongly corroborative of the firmness of a defendant's criminal intent." Buffington, 815 F.2d at 1301 ; see United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975). 8 The district court instructed the jury that the government must prove three elements in order to find the defendant guilty.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Elmer Mims, United States of America v. Franklin Michael Einfeldt, United States of America v. Le Minh Thanh, United States of America v. Roger W. Techau, United States of America v. Burdell Doolin
See United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975). 54 Having found that Einfeldt's conduct amounted to substantial steps in the last three phone calls, and that his intent was to possess heroin, we determine that there was sufficient evidence that Einfeldt committed the underlying offense of attempt to possess heroin.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mims
See United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1980 Mercedes Benz 500 SE
An attempt requires “(1) an intent to engage in criminal conduct and (2) the performance of one or more overt acts which constitute a substantial step towards the commission of the substantive offense.” United States v. Williams, 704 F.2d 315, 321 (6th Cir.) (attempt to possess cocaine), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983); see United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir.1974) (attempt to distribute heroin), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 84-5623
An attempt requires "(1) an intent to engage in criminal conduct and (2) the performance of one or more overt acts which constitute a substantial step towards the commission of the substantive offense." United States v. Williams, 704 F.2d 315, 321 (6th Cir.) (attempt to possess cocaine), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983); see United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir.1974) (attempt to distribute heroin), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard A. Rosen, Robert Esson Rew and David Benton Holmes
See United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975); United States v. McDowell, 705 F.2d 426 (11th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dr. Mike Fooladi
See United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sigfredo Rivera-Sola, A/K/A Freddy
See United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975), for a fact pattern remarkably similar to that presented here, which resulted in affirmance of the defendant’s conviction. 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Antoine Mowad
See United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376-77 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975); United States v. Stallworth, 543 F.2d 1038, 1040 (2d Cir. 1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Thomas York and Stephen Joseph York
See, for example, the cases quoted in United States, v. Mandujano, 5 Cir. 1974, 499 F.2d 370, 374 , cert. denied, 1975, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Haddad
See also United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Church
In United States v. Byrd, 24 M.J. 286, 290 (C.M.A.1987), the United States Court of Military Appeals relied upon a test adopted by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit: [T]o be guilty of an attempt, a ‘defendant must have engaged in conduct which con: stitutes a substantial step toward commission of the crime’ and that ‘[a] substantial step must be conduct strongly corroborative of the firmness of the defendant’s criminal intent.’ United States v. Jackson, 560 F.2d 112, 116 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 941 , 98 S.Ct. 434 , 54 L.Ed.2d 301 (1977); see also Uni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hyska
By way of clarification, we stated in Byrd : [T]o be guilty of an attempt, a “defendant must have engaged in conduct which constitutes a substantial step toward commission of the crime” and ... “[a] substantial step must be conduct strongly corroborative of the firmness of the defendant’s criminal’ intent.” United States v. Jackson, 560 F.2d 112, 116 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 941 , 98 S.Ct. 434 , 54 L.Ed.2d 301 (1977); see also United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975); ALI Model Penal Co…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jay W. Marden
Compare Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298 , 77 S.Ct. 1064, 1084-85 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1356 (1957) (The purpose of the overt act requirement in conspiracy prosecutions is simply to manifest that the conspiracy no longer rests "solely in the minds of the conspirators."), with United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376-77 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975) (For there to be an attempt there must be an act constituting a "substantial step” toward commission of the crime, and the act must amount to "more than remote preparation" and be "strongly corro…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Presto
In Byrd , this Court found some help in this regard in the approach of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit: [T]o be guilty of an attempt, a “defendant must have engaged in conduct which constitutes a substantial step toward commission of the crime” and that “[a] substantial step must be conduct strongly corroborative of the firmness of the defendant’s criminal intent.” United States v. Jackson, 560 F.2d 112, 116 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 941 [ 98 S.Ct. 434 , 54 L.Ed.2d 301 ] (1977); see also United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Byrd
The 1951 requirement of an “act or acts done with the specific intent to commit the particular offense which, except for the interference of some cause preventing the carrying out of the intent, apparently would result in the actual commission of the offense” appears to impose a stricter requirement than that stated immediately thereafter — namely, that “there must be a specific intent to commit the particular offense accompanied by an overt act which directly tends to accomplish the unlawful purpose.” Of some aid in reducing the confusion is the view of the Court of Appeals for the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Podolsky
See, e.g., United States v. Rovetuso, 768 F.2d 809, 821 (7th Cir.1985), citing United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Manley and Fluer Williams
United States v. Jackson, 560 F.2d 112 , 117— 20 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 941 , 98 S.Ct. 434 , 54 L.Ed.2d 301 (1977); United States v. Stallworth, 543 F.2d 1038, 1040 (2d Cir. 1976); see also United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975), and see United States v. Alvarez, 610 F.2d 1250 , 1254 n.3 (5th Cir. 1980); United States v. Oviedo, 525 F.2d 881, 885-86 (5th Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Daniel Freeman, Robert Temp and Alaine Carter Temp, Defendants
See, e. g., United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 379 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975) (witness’ “understanding”). *1121 Appellants suggest that three letters written by investors or their attorneys were hearsay, unauthenticated, or irrelevant.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Magee
v.
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
v.
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
No. 74-5468.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1975.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.