green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case ·
…a convicted criminal may be reasonably restricted as part of his sentence with respect to his associations in order to prevent his future criminality.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Henson v. State
(2×)
a convicted criminal may be reasonably restricted as part of his sentence with respect to his associations in order to prevent his future criminality.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Richard A. Aitken
f a person acts without reasonable ground for belief that his conduct is lawful, it is for the jury to decide whether he acted in good faith or whether he willfully intended to fail to file a tax return.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kessler
(2×)
“The question is whether there is a reasonable nexus between the conditions imposed and the goals to be achieved by the probation.” State v. Davis, 119 Ariz. 140,142 , 579 P.2d 1110, 1112 (App.l978)(finding such a nexus existed in upholding a condition prohibiting probationer from obtaining custody of her children); see Malone v. United States, 502 F.2d 554, 556-57 (9th Cir.l974)(finding a “reasonable nexus between the probation conditions and the goals of probation” in that case and noting that a “convicted criminal may be reasonably restricted as part of his sentence with respect t…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Moss (92-1132) Ronald Kohn (92-1136) Joann Climpson (92-1144) and Randy Richardson (92-1155)
(2×)
See United States v. Kemper, 503 F.2d 327, 329 (6th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124 , 95 S.Ct. 810 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen M. Pierce
See id. "[I]f the language in the indictment is information which the government hopes to properly prove at trial, it cannot be considered surplusage no matter how prejudicial it may be (provided, of course, it is legally relevant)." United States. v. Thomas, 875 F.2d 559 , 562 n. 2 (6th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Climatemp, Inc., 482 F.Supp. 376, 391 (N.D.Ill.1979)), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 189 (1989). 39 We hold that defendant's arguments relating to this issue are without merit and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion to delete the final pa…
discussed
Cited "see"
23 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 893, 26 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 860 United States of America v. Carol G. Unruh, William L. Fowler, Robert Hopper, Stephen C. Forde, Defendants
See Cooley v. United States, 501 F.2d 1249, 1253-54 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1123 , 95 S.Ct. 809 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975); see also Marx & Co. v. Diners' Club, Inc., 550 F.2d 505, 509-10 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 861 , 98 S.Ct. 188 , 54 L.Ed.2d 134 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Delbert Taylor
Accord United States v. Cochran, 499 F.2d 380, 388 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 502 F.2d 1168 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124 , 95 S.Ct. 810 , 42 L.Ed.2d 825 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Unruh
See Cooley v. United States, 501 F.2d 1249, 1253-54 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1123 , 95 S.Ct. 809 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975); see also Marx & Co. v. Diners’ Club, Inc., 550 F.2d 505, 509-10 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 861 , 98 S.Ct. 188 , 54 L.Ed.2d 134 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Markley v. State
(2×)
See Malone v. United States , 502 F.2d 554 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124 , 95 S.Ct. 809 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond L. Ness
See Cooley v. United States, 501 F.2d 1249 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1123 , 95 S.Ct. 809 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jordan
See United States v. Kemper, 503 F.2d 327, 329 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124 , 95 S.Ct. 810 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl T. Jordan, A/K/A Charles Jordan, A/K/A Robert Grant, A/K/A Vernell Rice, A/K/A Billy Lee Rice
See United States v. Kemper, 503 F.2d 327, 329 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124 , 95 S.Ct. 810 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975). 2 In Pollack this Court stated that: (t)he fraud statutes speak alternatively of devising or intending to devise a scheme to defraud and do not require that the deception bear fruit for the wrongdoer or cause injury to the intended victim as a prerequisite to successful prosecution. 534 F.2d at 971. 3 Appellant maintains that thirty-five checks were received in evidence to support counts one through twenty-three, the mail fraud counts.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bonanno
See Malone v. United States, 502 F.2d 554 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 809 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1974). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Demetrio Arteaga-Limones and Mike Lozano Cantu
(2×)
See United States v. Cochran, 499 F.2d 380 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124 , 95 S.Ct. 810 , 42 L.Ed.2d 825 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LoFranco v. United States Parole Commission
(2×)
See, e.g., Malone v. United States, 502 F.2d 554, 556-57 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124 , 95 S.Ct. 809 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975); Birzon v. King, 469 F.2d 1241, 1243 (2d Cir.1972); Hyser v. Reed, 318 F.2d 225, 239 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 447 , 11 L.Ed.2d 316 (1963). “[W]hen a convict is conditionally released on parole, the Government retains a substantial interest in ensuring that its rehabilitative goal is not frustrated and that the public is protected from further criminal acts of the parolee.” Birzon v. King, 469 F.2d at 1243 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
King v. State
(2×)
See also, United States v. Consuelo-Gonzalez, [ 521 F.2d 259, 264 (9th Cir.1975) ], and Malone v. United States, [ 502 F.2d 554 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124 , 95 S.Ct. 809 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975)], and United States v. Lowe, supra.” The condition imposed in this cause was neither unreasonable nor unconstitutional.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry Thomas (87-1623), Anthony L. Gaston (87-1634), and Eddie Gaston (87-1697)
See also United States v. Kemper, 503 F.2d 327, 329 (6th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124 , 95 S.Ct. 810 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Friberg
(4×)
See, e.g., Malone v. United States, 502 F.2d 554 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124 , 95 S.Ct. 809 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975) (defendant prohibited from associating with the Irish Republican Army and from going to certain Irish pubs); State v. Martinez, 59 Haw. 366 , 580 P.2d 1282 (1978) (condition that probationer refrain from company of people of questionable character upheld).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert W. Flitcraft and Rebecca A. Flitcraft
See, e.g., Cooley v. United States, 501 F.2d 1249, 1253 , (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1123 , 95 S.Ct. 809 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James David Kimmel
See, e.g., Cooley v. United States, 501 F.2d 1249, 1252 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1123 , 95 S.Ct. 809 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975). 6 The district court did not explain on the record the risks of self-representation to Kimmel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Norfolk & Western Company v. United States of America, and Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Company
See also United States v. Raven, 500 F.2d 728 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124 (1974) (holding that a sunken 83 foot schooner was an obstruction to navigation within the meaning of the Act.) V.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonard Patrick
See e. g., Cooley v. United States, 501 F.2d 1249 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1123 , 95 S.Ct. 809 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975); United States v. Malinowski, 472 F.2d 850, 855 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 970 , 93 S.Ct. 2164 , 36 L.Ed.2d 693 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Raven
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 74-5408.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 20, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Special Appeals of Ma… (2) · First Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.