green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“the government need not prove to a certainty that normal investigative techniques will not succeed, but rather need only show that such techniques 'reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried”
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
State v. Olkon
But see United States v. Licursi, 525 F.2d 1164 (2d Cir. 1975), United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 49 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Zolp
the government need not prove to a certainty that normal investigative techniques will not succeed, but rather need only show that such techniques 'reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McGlory
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29, 38 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Reginald D. McGlory Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, A/K/A Chubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pruitt, Vira Kulkivit, A/K/A Wee, Yongyos Thauthong, Willie J. Purdom and Charles Cotton. Vira Kulkovit, United States of America v. Reginald D. McGlory Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, A/K/A Chubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pruitt, Vira Kulkivit, A/K/A Wee, Yongyos Thauthong, Willie J. Purdom and Charles Cotton. Melvin Hauser, United States of America v. Reginald D. McGlory Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, A/K/A Chubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pruitt, Vira Kulkivit, A/K/A Wee, Yongyos Thauthong, Willie J. Purdom and Charles Cotton. Reginald D. McGlory United States of America v. Reginald D. McGlory Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, A/K/A Chubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pruitt, Vira Kulkivit, A/K/A Wee, Yongyos Thauthong, Willie J. Purdom and Charles Cotton. Charles Cotton
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29, 38 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony J. Leisure, United States of America v. Charles M. Loewe, United States of America v. David R. Leisure, United States of America v. Paul John Leisure, A/K/A John Paul Leisure, United States of America v. Steven T. Wougamon
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29, 38 (3d Cir.) ("Although the government has actual knowledge of a conspiracy and evidence sufficient to prosecute one of the conspirators, it is unrealistic to require the termination of an investigation before the entire scope of the [criminal enterprise] is uncovered."), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975). 48 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leisure
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29, 88 (3d Cir.) (“Although the government has actual knowledge of a conspiracy and evidence sufficient to prosecute one of the conspirators, it is unrealistic to require the termination of an investigation before the entire scope of the [criminal enterprise] is uncovered.”), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975). 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
Boggan v. State
See Roynica v. State , 54 Ala. App. 436 , 309 So.2d 475 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 293 Ala. 772 , 309 So.2d 485 (Ala. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 85 (1975); Burlison v. State , 369 So.2d 844 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 369 So.2d 854 (Ala. 1979); Lofton v. State , 371 So.2d 988 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979); Allen v. State , 382 So.2d 1147 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 382 So.2d 1158 (Ala. 1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Sarno v. State
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29 , 38 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975); State v. Carney, 407 So.2d 340 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dorfman
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29, 35 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975); United States v. Lyons, 507 F.Supp. 551, 554 (D.Md.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 49, 54-55 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. La Monte
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29, 41 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Paul Diadone, John Eli Stone, Richard Carl Biggs, Reuben Goldstein, and John Denton Ritter, United States of America v. James William \Puny\" Winningham"
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975). 18 In the hearing on defendants' motion to suppress, Mr. Jaquet, the Assistant United States Attorney in charge of the interception, testified that as to the taps on the pay telephones: (1) sometimes, there was difficulty in determining whether Stone was in the restaurant and, in fact, Stone left the premises on several occasions without being observed; (2) the monitored telephones were located in places not well suited for surveillance; (3) monitoring agents encountered unexp…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Diadone
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clerkley
(2×)
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29, 37-38 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975); United States v. James, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 88 , 494 F.2d 1007,1015-16 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1020 , 95 S.Ct. 495 , 42 L.Ed.2d 294 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. MacEo Clerkley, United States of America v. Julius Cottman, United States of America v. Rufus Jones, United States of America v. Robert R. London, A/K/A Fifi London, United States of America v. Robert Himes, United States of America v. Richard James Genco, United States of America v. John A. Shade
(2×)
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29, 37-38 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975); United States v. James, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 88 , 494 F.2d 1007, 1015-16 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1020 , 95 S.Ct. 495 , 42 L.Ed.2d 294 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Murphy
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F. 2d 29, 41 (3 Cir.1975), cert. den. 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed. 2d 84 (1975); United States v. Carmichael, 489 F. 2d 983 (7 Cir.1973); United States v. Marihart, 492 F. 2d 897, 900 (8 Cir.1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 827 , 95 S.Ct. 46 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 51 (1974); cf. United States v. Thomas, 489 F. 2d 664 (5 Cir.1973), cert. den. 423 U.S. 844 , 96 S.Ct. 79 , 46 L.Ed. 2d 64 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Murphy
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F. 2d 29, 41 (3 Cir. 1975), cert. den. 423 U. S. 858 , 96 S. Ct. 111 , 46 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Matthews
See United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 49, 52 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. King
See United States v. Bynum, 485 F.2d 490, 500 (2d Cir.1973), vacated on other grounds, 417 U.S. 903 , 94 S.Ct. 2598 , 41 L.Ed.2d 209 (1974); see also United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29, 45 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975); United States v. Capra, 501 F.2d 267, 275 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 990 , 95 S.Ct. 1424 , 43 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Moody
See, e.g., United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29, 45 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, Conti v. United States, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975); United States v. Capra, 501 F.2d 267 , 275- *1498 76 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 990 , 95 S.Ct. 1424 , 43 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hallford v. State
See also Roynica v. State, 54 Ala.App. 436 , 309 So.2d 475 (Ala.Cr.App.1974), cert. denied, 293 Ala. 772 , 309 So.2d 485 (Ala.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 85 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nunzio Provenzano, in 81-2411. Appeal of Irving Cotler, in 81-2412
See, e.g., United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29, 51-52 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Joseph Rosa A/K/A \Joe\" Joseph Sica
(2×)
See also United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29,46 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stebbins
v.
D. C. Transit System, Inc.
v.
D. C. Transit System, Inc.
No. 74-6677.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: D. New Jersey (1)
Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.