green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Kowalski v. American Steamship Co.
See Gillham v. Admiral Corp., 523 F.2d 102, 109 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Portage II and Portage IV v. Bryant Petroleum Corp., Dr. Clarke N. Simm
Accord Gillham v. Admiral Corp., 523 F.2d 102, 109 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976); Perry v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio R.R., 502 F.2d 1144 (6th Cir.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Williamson v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
See Gillham v. Admiral Corp., 523 F.2d 102, 109 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
See Gillham v. Admiral Corp., 523 F.2d 102, 109 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
See Gillham v. Admiral Corp., 523 F.2d 102, 109 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Glen K. Dorsey, Jr. And Barbara J. Dorsey, His Wife, Cross v. Honda Motor Company Ltd., Cross Honda Motor Company Ltd., Cross v. Continental Casualty Company, Cross
See Gillham v. Admiral Corp., 523 F.2d 102 (6th Cir. 1975) (Ohio law), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976); Hoffman v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 485 F.2d 132 (3d Cir. 1973) (Pennsylvania law); Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal.App.3d 757 , 174 Cal.Rptr. 348 (1981), petitions for hearing filed, (Cal. July 7, 1981); Leichtamer v. American Motors Corp., No. 5223 (Ohio Ct.App.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorsey v. Honda Motor Co.
See Gillham v. Admiral Corp., 523 F.2d 102 (6th Cir. 1975) (Ohio law), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976); Hoffman v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 485 F.2d 132 (3d Cir. 1973) (Pennsylvania law); Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal.App.3d 757 , 174 Cal.Rptr. 348 (1981), petitions for hearing filed, (Cal. July 7, 1981); Leichtamer v. American Motors Corp., No. 5223 (Ohio Ct. App. July 30, 1980) (awarding punitive damages in a “crashworthiness” case), affirmed, 424 N.E.2d 568 (Ohio 1981); Wangen v. Ford Motor Co., 97 Wis.2d 260 , 294 N.W.2d 437, 444 (1980) (awarding pu…
cited
Cited "see"
City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
See Gillham v. Admiral Corp., 523 F.2d 102, 109 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tigert v. Admiral Corp.
See excellent opinion in Gillham v. Admiral Corporation, 523 F.2d 102 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 . 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976), upholding judgment against Admiral for both compensatory and punitive damages based on a television-ignited fire where evidence showed Admiral made and used unsafe high voltage transformers in its sets and continued to do so even after receiving information that the units were starting home and human destructive fires.
cited
Cited "see"
18 Fair empl.prac.cas. 225, 18 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8646 Hubert Morelock v. The Ncr Corporation
See Gillham v. Admiral Corp., 523 F.2d 102, 109 (6th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Morelock v. NCR Corp.
See Gillham v. Admiral Corp., 523 F.2d 102, 109 (6th Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartzler v. Licking County Humane Society
See also Gilham v. Admiral Corp., 523 F.2d 102, 109 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976); Perry v. Gulf, Mobil & Ohio R.R., 502 F.2d 1144 (6th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Riverview Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corporation
See also Gillham v. Admiral Corp., 523 F.2d 102, 109 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976). 40 The Supreme Court has limited the inferences that can be drawn from ambiguous evidence in Sherman Act section 1 cases.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Riverview Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corp.
See also Gillham v. Admiral Corp., 523 F.2d 102, 109 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnwell v. Barber-Colman Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Gillham v. The Admiral Corporation , 523 F. (2d) 102 (6th Cir.1975, cert. denied , 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 47 L.Ed. (2d) 318 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Gillham v. The Admiral Corporation, 523 F.2d 102 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S. Ct. 1113 , 476 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Day
(2×)
See, e. g., Gillham v. The Admiral Corporation, 523 F.2d 102 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1113 , 476 L.Ed.2d 318 (1976); Toole v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 251 Cal.App.2d 689 , 60 Cal.Rptr. 398 (1967); 13 Moore v. Jewel Tea Company, 116 Ill.App.2d 109 , 253 N.E.2d 636 (1969), aff’d 46 Ill.2d 288 , 263 N.E.2d 103 (1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Admiral Corp.
v.
Gillham
v.
Gillham
No. 75-872.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1976.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.