Miller v. Union Elec. Co., 423 U.S. 873 (1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Miller v. Union Elec. Co., 423 U.S. 873 (1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
77 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Blanca Garcia-Rosa, United States of America v. Pedro Soto-Alvarez, A/K/A Junior, United States of America v. Angel Rivera-Feliciano, A/K/A Junior Azuquita, United States of America v. Victor Carrera-Perez, A/K/A Paye, United States of America v. Eduardo Rivera-Ortiz, United States of America v. Jose Heredia Nieves, A/K/A Checo El Perro (ca1, 1989-05-23) · Strongest negative: United States v. Rodriguez (ctd, 1985-06-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Rodriguez
D. Conn. · 1985 · signal: but see · confidence high
United States v. Diadone, 558 F.2d 775, 780 (5th Cir. *730 1977); but see United States v. Sklaroff, 506 F.2d 837, 840 (5th Cir.1975) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975) (14 day delay satisfactorily explained in that for 7 days tapes were used to prepare search warrants, and for 7 days tapes were kept securely in FBI evidence room).
cited Cited "but see" United States v. Fred Jules Abraham
6th Cir. · 1976 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Sklaroff, 506 F.2d 837 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Blanca Garcia-Rosa, United States of America v. Pedro Soto-Alvarez, A/K/A Junior, United States of America v. Angel Rivera-Feliciano, A/K/A Junior Azuquita, United States of America v. Victor Carrera-Perez, A/K/A Paye, United States of America v. Eduardo Rivera-Ortiz, United States of America v. Jose Heredia Nieves, A/K/A Checo El Perro
1st Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pomponio, 511 F.2d 953, 957 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 96 S.Ct. 143 , 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Garcia-Rosa
1st Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pomponio, 511 F.2d 953, 957 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 96 S.Ct. 143 , 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975).
cited Cited "see" Love v. Hidalgo
D. Maryland · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Andrews v. Knowlton, 509 F.2d 898, 903 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 873 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975) (and cases cited therein).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dave Feldman, Richard Zalmanowski, and Kenneth Baker
6th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tr. of Motion to Suppress, Vol. I, 38-40 16 Cf. United States v. Sklaroff, 506 F.2d 837 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975) 17 The district court found that the existence of the "bootleg" telephone was not known by the Government agent at the time the wiretaps were installed.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Aloi (2×)
E.D.N.Y · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
It is not necessary to allege the elements of the state substantive offense intended to be committed, or that the unlawful objective intended was accomplished. *714 Id. at 74 (emphasis supplied); see United States v. Pomponio, 511 F.2d 953, 957 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975); United States v. Corallo, 413 F.2d 1306, 1320 (2d Cir. 1969); McIntosh v. United States, 385 F.2d 274, 276 (8th Cir. 1967). 20 From this also flows the conclusion that it is likewise unnecessary to name in the indictment the public official who was the alleged object of the b…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Carrazana
11th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Sklaroff, 323 F.Supp. 296, 306-07 (S.D.Fla.1971), aff'd, 506 F.2d 837 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Carrazana
11th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Sklaroff, 323 F.Supp. 296, 306-07 (S.D.Fla.1971), aff'd, 506 F.2d 837 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Milton Teplin
4th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Pomponio, 511 F.2d 953, 957 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975) ("The ‘unlawful activity’ specified in the [Travel] Act may be [an offense] under state or federal law and reference to such law is necessary only to identify the type of ‘unlawful’ activity in which the defendants intended to engage.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Salvatore Finazzo and Dominic Licavoli
6th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Pomponio, 511 F.2d 953, 957 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Miller
v.
Union Electric Co.
No. 75-5261.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1975.
423 U.S. 873
Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.