green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1991 ·
…a regular officer cannot legally receive a stigma-type discharge after mere administrative proceedings of any kind
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
City of Corpus Christi, Texas v. City of Ingleside, Texas
the alteration of the boundaries of political subdivisions by the state is a political function entirely within the power of the state legislature to regulate.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
James Andrew Thomas v. Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense, and Michael P.W. Stone, Secretary of the Army
(2×)
a regular officer cannot legally receive a stigma-type discharge after mere administrative proceedings of any kind
discussed
Cited "see"
Estados Unidos Mexicanos v. DeCoster
(2×)
See Pfizer, Inc. v. Lord, 522 F.2d 612, 617-18 (8th Cir.1975) (“th[e] strong preference for class actions over Parens patriae has been repeatedly expressed”), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1421 , 47 L.Ed.2d 356 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jonathan Logan, Inc.
(2×)
See Pfizer, Inc. v. Lord, 522 F.2d 612 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1421 -22, 47 L.Ed.2d 356 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Robert Rucker v. Secretary of the Army
See Carter v. United States, 509 F.2d 1150 (Ct.Cl. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1076 , 96 S.Ct. 861 , 47 L.Ed.2d 86 (1976), reh. denied, 424 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1423 , 47 L.Ed.2d 356 (1976); Doyle v. United States, 599 F.2d 984 , 220 Ct.Cl. 285 (Ct.Cl.1980); amended In re Doyle, 609 F.2d 990 , 220 Ct.Cl. 326 (Ct.Cl.1980), ce rt. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980) ( 10 U.S.C. § 1552 confers the power to correct records in favor of a serviceman and never against him.
discussed
Cited "see"
American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company v. United States District Court For The Northern District Of California
(2×)
If a rational and substantial legal argument can be made in support of the questioned jurisdictional ruling, the case is not appropriate for mandamus . . . even though on normal appeal a reviewing court might find reversible error. 20 American Airlines, Inc. v. Forman, 204 F.2d 230, 232 (3d Cir. 1953) (writ to review allegation of erroneous retention of jurisdiction of suit within Civil Aeronautics Board primary jurisdiction denied); accord, Pfizer, Inc. v. Lord, 522 F.2d 612, 615 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1421 , 47 L.Ed.2d 356 , 44 U.S.L.W. 3494 (1976) (quoting Fo…
discussed
Cited "see"
American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. United States District Court
(2×)
American Airlines, Inc. v. Forman, 204 F.2d 230, 232 (3d Cir. 1953) (writ to review allegation of erroneous retention of jurisdiction of suit within Civil Aeronautics Board primary jurisdiction denied); accord, Pfizer, Inc. v. Lord, 522 F.2d 612, 615 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1421 , 47 L.Ed.2d 356 , 44 U.S.L.W. 3494 (1976) (quoting Forman) (writ to review jurisdiction over foreign governments under the Clayton Act denied).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Iap Worldwide Services, Inc. v. United States
Cir. 1990)); see also Carter v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 316, 318 , 518 F.2d 1199, 1199 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1076 , reh’g denied, 424 U.S. 950 (1976); CanPro Invs.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hymas v. United States
Cir. 1990)); see also Carter v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 316, 318 , 518 F.2d 1199, 1199 (1975), cert_. denied, 423 U.S. 1076 , @_h_’g denied, 424 U.S. 950 (1976); CanPro lnvs.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Menendez v. United States
Cir. 1990); see also Carter v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 316, 318 , 518 F.2d 1199, 1199 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1076 , reh’g denied, 424 U.S. 950 (1976); CanPro Invs.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lucier v. United States
Cir. 1990); see also Carter v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 316, 318 , 518 F.2d 1199, 1199 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1076 , reh’g denied, 424 U.S. 950 (1976); CanPro Invs.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baley v. United States
Cir. 1990); see also Carter v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 316, 318 , 518 F.2d 1199, 1199 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1076 , 96 S.Ct. 861 , 47 L.Ed.2d 86 , reh’g denied, 424 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1423 , 47 L.Ed.2d 356 (1976); Osage Tribe of Indians of Okla. v. United States, 97 Fed.Cl. 345, 348 (2011) (discussing RCFC 59(a) and 60(b)); Penga v. United States, 97 Fed.Cl. 80, 83 (2011) (discussing RCFC 59(a)); Webster v. United States, 92 Fed.Cl. 321, 324 , recons. denied, 93 Fed.Cl. 676 (2010) (discussing RCFC 60(b)); Alpha I, L.P. ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Klamath Irrigation v. United States
Cir. 1990); see also Carter v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 316, 318 , 518 F.2d 1199, 1199 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1076 , reh’g denied, 424 U.S. 950 (1976); Osage Tribe of Indians of Okla., 97 Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nie v. United States
Cir. 1990); see also Carter v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 316, 318 , 518 F.2d 1199, 1199 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1076 , reh'g denied, 424 U.S. 950 (1976); Osage Tribe of Indians of Okla., 97 Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ogunniyi v. United States
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has stated that: “The decision whether to grant reconsideration lies largely within the discretion of the [trial] court.” Yuba Natural Res., Inc. v. United States, 904 F.2d 1577, 1583 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (Fed.Cir.1990); see also Carter v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 316, 318 , 518 F.2d 1199, 1199 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1076 , 96 S.Ct. 861 , 47 L.Ed.2d 86 , reh’g denied, 424 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1423 , 47 L.Ed.2d 356 (1976); Osage Tribe of Indians of Okla. v. United States, 97 Fed.Cl. 345, 348 (2011) (discussing RCFC 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fillmore Equipment of Holland, Inc. v. United States
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has stated that: “The decision whether to grant reconsideration lies largely within the discretion of the [trial] court.” Yuba Natural Res., Inc. v. United States, 904 F.2d 1577, 1583 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (Fed.Cir. 1990); see also Carter v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 316, 318 , 518 F.2d 1199, 1199 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1076 , 96 S.Ct. 861 , 47 L.Ed.2d 86 , reh’g denied, 424 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1423 , 47 L.Ed.2d 356 (1976); Osage Tribe of Indians of Okla. v. United States, 97 Fed.Cl. 345, 348 (2011) (discussing Rules…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Englewood Terrace Ltd. Partnership v. United States
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has stated that: “The decision whether to grant reconsideration lies largely within the discretion of the [trial] court.” Yuba Natural Res., Inc. v. United States, 904 F.2d 1577, 1583 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (Fed.Cir.1990); see also Carter v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 316, 318 , 518 F.2d 1199, 1199 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1076 , 96 S.Ct. 861 , 47 L.Ed.2d 86 reh’g denied, 424 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1423 , 47 L.Ed.2d 356 (1976); Webster v. United States, 92 Fed.Cl. 321, 324 , recons. denied, 93 Fed.Cl. 676 (2010); Alpha I, L…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. Bandemer
(2×)
See also Jimenez v. Hidalgo County Water Improvement District No. 2, 424 U. S. 950 (1976), summarily aff’g 68 F. R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Campos v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
See, e.g., Downey v. Moore's Time-Saving Equipment, Inc., 432 F. 2d 1088 (7 Cir.1970), questioned in Collins v. Ridge Tool Company, 520 F. 2d 591, 595 (7 Cir.1975), cert. den. 424 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 1421 , 47 L.Ed. 2d 355 (1976) where the court noted: ... [T]here is an indication that the more recent trend of the cases evidences an increasing dissatisfaction with the Campo doctrine and opts instead in favor of an approach which reflects an effort to `discourage misdesign rather than encouraging it in its obvious form.' [Citation omitted] See also Olson v. A.W.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Caserta v. Village of Dickinson
See also, Jimenez v. Hidalgo County Water Improvement District No. 2, 68 F.R.D. 668 (S.D.Tex.1975) (3-judge court), aff’d 424 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1423 , 47 L.Ed.2d 357 (1975) (mem). 20 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Garrison, Warden
v.
Edwards
v.
Edwards
No. 75-958.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1976.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (2) · Court of Appeals of Texas (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.