green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Scotch v. Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabrook & Weeden, Inc.
See Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood, 509 F.2d 1287, 1292 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976) (citing Jordan Building Corp. v. Doyle, O’Connor & Co., 401 F.2d 47 , 51 (7th Cir.1968)) (remedies supplied by the 1933 and 1934 Acts are cumulative and not mutually exclusive); Wilko v. Swan, supra; see also H.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Grom
See United States v. Fairchild, 526 F.2d 185 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 942 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976); United States v. Baumgarten, 517 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 878 , 96 S.Ct. 152 , 46 L.Ed.2d 111 (1975); United States v. Johnson, 3 M.J. 143 (C.M.A.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wachovia Bank and Trust Co., N. A. (As Trustee and Agent for Various Trust Accounts) v. National Student Marketing Corporation, Two Cases. Wachovia Bank and Trust Co., N. A. (As Trustee and Agent for Various Trust Accounts) v. National Student Marketing Corporation, White & Case, Wachovia Bank and Trust Co., N. A. (As Trustee and Agent for Various Trust Accounts) v. National Student Marketing Corporation, Peat, Marwick, Wachovia Bank and Trust Co., N. A. (As Trustee and Agent for Various Trust Accounts) v. National Student Marketing Corporation, Roger O. Walther, Wachovia Bank and Trust Co., N. A. (As Trustee and Agent for Various Trust Accounts) v. National Student Marketing Corporation, James F. Joy, Wachovia Bank and Trust Co., N. A. (As Trustee and Agent for Various Trust Accounts) v. National Student Marketing Corporation, Donald A. Fergusson and Robert A. Fergusson, Wachovia Bank and Trust Co., N. A. (As Trustee and Agent for Various Trust Accounts) v. National Student Marketing Corporation, Cortes W. Randell
See Schaefer v. First Nat'l Bank, 509 F.2d 1287, 1292 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976); Wolf v. Frank, 477 F.2d 467, 475 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 975 , 94 S.Ct. 287 , 38 L.Ed.2d 218 (1973); Rekant v. Desser, 425 F.2d 872, 882 (5th Cir. 1970); Jordan Bldg.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wachovia Bank v. National Student Marketing Corp.
See Schaefer v. First Nat’l Bank, 509 F.2d 1287, 1292 (7th Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 943, 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976); Wolf v. Frank, 477 F.2d 467, 475 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 975 , 94 S.Ct. 287 , 38 L.Ed.2d 218 (1973); Rekant v. Desser, 425 F.2d 872, 882 (5th Cir. 1970); Jordan Bldg.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wolgin v. Magic Marker Corp.
See Schaefer v. First Nat’l Bank, 509 F.2d 1287, 1291-93 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976); Schaefer v. First Nat’l Bank, 326 F.Supp. 1186, 1189-90 (N.D.Ill.1970), appeal dismissed per curiam, 465 F.2d 234 (7th Cir. 1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Groover
See Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood, 509 F.2d 1287, 1299-1300 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl Williams
See, e. g., United States v. Gubelman, supra, 571 F.2d at 1255-56 ; accord, United States v. Fairchild, 526 F.2d 185, 189 (7th Cir. 1975) (Stevens, J.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 942 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tonelli
See, e. g., United States v. Gubelman, supra, 571 F.2d at 1255-56 ; accord, United States v. Fair-child, 526 F.2d 185, 189 (7th Cir. 1975) (Stevens, J.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 942 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Normann v. Vickers Energy Corp.
See Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood, 509 F.2d 1287, 1299-1300 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Transocean Tender Offer Securities Lit.
See Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood, 509 F.2d 1287, 1299-1300 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berger v. Bishop Investment Corp.
See also Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood, 509 F.2d 1287 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976); Jordan Building Corp. v. Doyle, O’Connor & Co., 401 F.2d 47 (7th Cir.1968); Ellis v. Carter, 291 F.2d 270 (9th Cir.1961); Matheson v. Armbrust, 284 F.2d 670 (9th Cir.1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 870 , 81 S.Ct. 904 , 5 L.Ed.2d 860 (1961); In re New York City Municipal Securities Litigation, 507 F.Supp. 169 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Wolgin v. Magic Marker Corp., 82 F.R.D. 168 (E.D.Pa. 1979); Beecher v. Able, 435 F.Supp. 397 (S.D.N.Y.1977); Seiden v. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dean Berger v. Bishop Investment Corporation
See also Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood, 509 F.2d 1287 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976); Jordan Building Corp. v. Doyle, O'Connor & Co., 401 F.2d 47 (7th Cir.1968); Ellis v. Carter, 291 F.2d 270 (9th Cir.1961); Matheson v. Armbrust, 284 F.2d 670 (9th Cir.1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 870 , 81 S.Ct. 904 , 5 L.Ed.2d 860 (1961); In re New York City Municipal Securities Litigation, 507 F.Supp. 169 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Wolgin v. Magic Marker Corp., 82 F.R.D. 168 (E.D.Pa.1979); Beecher v. Able, 435 F.Supp. 397 (S.D.N.Y.1977); Seiden v. Nic…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,642, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,919, 8 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 61 Ralph E. Huddleston and Chester E. Bradley, Jr., Individually and as Designated Class Representatives v. Herman & MacLean Etc., Herman & MacLean Certified Public Accountants, a Partnership, and Lawrence A. Lopatin, Leslie Share
See e. g., Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood, 509 F.2d 1287, 1292 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976); Jordan Building Corp. v. Doyle, O'Connor & Co., 401 F.2d 47 (7th Cir. 1968); Ellis v. Carter, 291 F.2d 270 (9th Cir. 1961); Matheson v. Armbrust, 284 F.2d 670 , 674 (9th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 870 , 81 S.Ct. 904 , 5 L.Ed.2d 860 (1961); Fischman v. Raytheon MFG.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Huddleston v. Herman & MacLean
See e. g., Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood, 509 F.2d 1287, 1292 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976); Jordan Building Corp. v. Doyle, O’Connor & Co., 401 F.2d 47 (7th Cir. 1968); Ellis v. Carter, 291 F.2d 270 (9th Cir. 1961); Matheson v. Armbrust, 284 F.2d 670 , 674 (9th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 870 , 81 S.Ct. 904 , 5 L.Ed.2d 860 (1961); Fischman v. Raytheon MFG.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ross v. A. H. Robins Company
See also Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood, 509 F.2d 1287, 1293 (7th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976) ("The plaintiffs may make their claim for relief under Rule 10b-5 even though the alleged market rigging scheme also falls squarely within section 9(a)(2)" of the 1934 Act.). 33 Notwithstanding these cited authorities, we believe that this position is overly broad in light of more recent Supreme Court decisions which have cast considerable doubt on the continuing vitality of the view that the remedies in the securities acts were meant …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ross v. A. H. Robins Co.
See also Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood, 509 F.2d 1287, 1293 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976) (“The plaintiffs may make their claim for relief under Rule 10b — 5 even though the alleged market rigging scheme also falls squarely within section 9(a)(2)” of the 1934 Act.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
O'HARA v. Kovens
See also Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood, 509 F.2d 1287, 1295-98 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976); Hochfelder v. Midwest Stock Exchange, 503 F.2d 364 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 875 , 95 S.Ct. 137 , 42 L.Ed.2d 114 (1974). 8 Although the period of limitations will be borrowed from state law whenever equitable tolling is applied, the question of when that limitations period begins is a matter of federal law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,366 Benjamin A. Cook v. Avien, Inc., James F. Pritchard, Benjamin A. Cook v. Avien, Inc.
See also Schaefer v. First National Bank, 509 F.2d 1287, 1297 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1682 , 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976); Arneil v. Ramsey, supra. Cf. Lukenas v. Bryce’s Mountain Resort, Inc., 538 F.2d 594 (4th Cir. 1976) (Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act suit); Dayco Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 523 F.2d 389 (6th Cir. 1975) (antitrust action).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brady v. State
See also United States v. Fairchild, 526 F. 2d 185 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 96 S. Ct. 1682 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rayner
v.
John Buist Chester Hospital
v.
John Buist Chester Hospital
No. 75-6407.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1976.
Published
Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.