green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.0 score
“as originally enacted .. . that statute prohibited simply the smuggling or unlawful bringing of aliens into the united states.”
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Ignacio Antonio Zayas-Morales
as originally enacted .. . that statute prohibited simply the smuggling or unlawful bringing of aliens into the united states.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angel Rubio-Gonzalez
Accord United States v. Lopez, 521 F.2d 437, 441 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 995 , 96 S.Ct. 421 , 46 L.Ed.2d 368 (1975); United States v. Acosta De Evans, 531 F.2d 428 , 430 n. 4 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 836 , 97 S.Ct. 103 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 20, 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,173
See E.E.O.C. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, 511 F.2d 273 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 994 , 96 S.Ct. 421 , 46 L.Ed.2d 368 (1975); United States v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, 334 F.Supp. 976 (S.D.Tex.1971) 4 The suit was originally brought by the Attorney General under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-6(a), which gave him jurisdiction when he had reasonable cause to believe that a person or group of persons were engaged in a pattern or practice of resistance to the enjoyment of any of the rights secured by the Act.
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n
See E.E.O.C. v. International Longshoremen’s Ass’n, 511 F.2d 273 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 994 , 96 S.Ct. 421 , 46 L.Ed.2d 368 (1975); United States v. International Longshoremen’s Ass’n, 334 F.Supp. 976 (S.D.Tex.1971). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Everett Huntley and Gipson F. Hemphill
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Seay, 386 F.Supp. 550 (E.D.Ill. 1974), aff’d, 518 F.2d 646 (7th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 995 , 96 S.Ct. 421 , 46 L.Ed.2d 368 , 44 U.S.L.W. 3330 (1975) (check written by fictitious drawer on company account); United States v. *1403 Scott, 457 F.2d 848 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 866 , 93 S.Ct. 160 , 34 L.Ed.2d 114 (1972) (check on company account drawn in fictitious name); United States v. Metcalf, 388 F.2d 440 (4th Cir. 1968) (check on individual account opened in fictitious name).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rastelli
v.
New York
v.
New York
No. 75-408.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1975.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.