green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,048 Milton E. Dupuy v. Clarence O. Dupuy, Jr.
But see Titan Group, Inc. v. Faggen, 2 Cir. 1975, 513 F.2d 234 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 70 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Demos
(2×)
See In re Heller, 333 A.2d 401, 402 (D.C.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 70 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Demos
See In re Heller, 333 A.2d 401, 402 (D.C.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 70 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Manville
(2×)
See In re Heller, 333 A.2d 401, 402 (D.C.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 70 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975). [4] We also make due allowance for the Committee's opportunity to observe and evaluate the demeanor of the applicant where relevant, e.g., with regard to such attitudes as sincerity or remorse.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pritchard Services Group of America, Inc. v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.
See Titan Group, Inc. v. Faggen, 513 F.2d 234, 236-39 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 70 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975); REA Express, Inc. v. Interway Corp., 410 F.Supp. 192, 197-201 (S.D.N.Y.), rev’d on other grounds, 538 F.2d 953 (2d Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
In a case of nondisclosure, the task of positively proving reliance may become impossible to perform, and although the courts still refer to the element of causation in fact, the question really becomes one of materiality: "All that is necessary is that the facts withheld be material in the sense that a reasonable investor might have considered them important in the making of this decision," Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States, 406 U.S. 128, 153-54 , 92 S.Ct. 1456, 1472 , 31 L.Ed.2d 741 (1972); see Titan Group, Inc. v. Faggen, 513 F.2d 234, 239 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S…
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
In a case of nondisclosure, the task of positively proving reliance may become impossible to perform, and although the courts still refer to the element of causation in fact, the question really becomes one of materiality: “All that is necessary is that the facts withheld be material in the sense that a reasonable investor might have considered them important in the making of this decision,” Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States, 406 U.S. 128, 153-54 , 92 S.Ct. 1456, 1472 , 31 L.Ed.2d 741 (1972); see Titan Group, Inc. v. Faggen, 513 F.2d 234, 239 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 840 , …
cited
Cited "see"
Stromfeld v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.
See Titan Group Inc. v. Faggen, 513 F.2d 234, 239 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 70 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Application of Gahan
See, In re Heller, 333 A.2d 401 (D.C.Ct.App.), certiorari denied, 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 70 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975); In re Cheek, 246 Or. 433 , 425 P.2d 763 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Bartels v. Algonquin Properties, Ltd.
See Titan Group, Inc. v. Faggen, 513 F.2d 234, 239 (2d Cir.) (Waterman, J.) cert. denied 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 70 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: Sateesh Apte, Debtor. Sateesh Apte v. Romesh Japra, M.D., F.A.C.C., Inc., a California Corporation
See also Titan Group, Inc. v. Faggen, 513 F.2d 234, 239 (2d Cir.1975) (“In eases involving nondisclosure of material facts, even when coupled with access to the information, materiality rather than reliance thus becomes the decisive element of causation”), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 70 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,649 Jean Lorelle Burke v. Robert E. Jacoby
All that is necessary is that the facts withheld be material in the sense that a reasonable investor might have considered them important in the making of this decision.” Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States, 406 U.S. 128, 153-54 , 92 S.Ct. 1456, 1472 , 31 L.Ed.2d 741 (1972); see also duPont v. Brady, 828 F.2d 75, 78 (2d Cir.1987) (“ ‘in instances of total nondisclosure, ... it is of course impossible to demonstrate reliance’ ”) (quoting Titan Group, Inc. v. Faggen, 513 F.2d 234, 239 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 70 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pellman v. Cinerama, Inc.
See, e. g., Titan Group, Inc., v. Faggen, 513 F.2d 234, 239 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 840 , 96 S.Ct. 70 , 46 L.Ed.2d 59 (1975); Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380-84 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCole
v.
Bidstrup
v.
Bidstrup
No. 74-1632.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1975.
Published
Ct. App. Wash. Certiorari denied.