green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.4 score
“restatement second”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Transocean Tender Offer Securities Lit.
restatement second
discussed
Cited "see"
Braun v. Smith
See, Clark v. Watchie, 513 F.2d 994, 999-1000 (9th Cir.1975) (alleged misrepresentations not made to every purchaser), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 (1975); Soper v. Valone, 110 F.R.D. 8, 9-10 (W.D.N.Y.1985) (various plaintiffs had invested with different types of entities, had spoken with different investment consultants, and had dissimilar financial goals); Seiler v. E.F.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shields v. Keating
See generally Clark v. Watchie, 513 F.2d 994 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 (1975); Blakely v. Lisac, 357 F.Supp 267 (D.Or.1972); McHan v. Grandbouche, 99 F.R.D. 260 (D.Kan.1983); Simon v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 482 F.2d 880 (5th Cir.) reh’g denied, 485 F.2d 687 (5th Cir.1973); Graham v. Security Savings & Loan, 125 F.R.D. 687 (N.D.Ind.1989), aff'd, 914 F.2d 909 (7th Cir.1990); Seiler v. E.F.
cited
Cited "see"
Walter Sanders v. James E. Sullivan and Robert Abrams, the Attorney General of the State of New York
See United States ex rel Sostre v. Festa, 513 F.2d 1313 , 1314 n. 1 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Frederick J. Wolfe, and Heather B. Wolfe, His Wife v. E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc., and Peter Panos,defendants-Appellants. Joseph Gorman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner and Smith, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Defendant- Micah Hollander, Michael Strauss
See Clark v. Watchie, 513 F.2d 994, 997 (9th Cir.) (citing Abramson v. Pennwood Investment Corp., 392 F.2d 759, 762 (2d Cir.1968)), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Wolfe v. E. F. Hutton & Co.
See Clark v. Watchie, 513 F.2d 994, 997 (9th Cir.) (citing Abramson v. Pennwood Investment Corp., 392 F.2d 759, 762 (2d Cir.1968)), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Baer v. Abel
See Clark v. Watchie, 513 F.2d 994, 997 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Baer v. Abel
See Clark v. Watchie, 513 F.2d 994, 997 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation
See, Clark v. Watchie, 513 F.2d 994 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Meding v. Hurd
See Hugh v. Trans-World Airlines, 336 A.2d 572 (Del.1975) (improper to deny plaintiff an opportunity to present claims when claims before another court were disposed of on grounds unrelated to the merits) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 61 (1975); Maldonado v. Flynn, 417 A.2d 378, 383 (Del.Ch.1980) (the rule against claim splitting should not operate “entirely [to] deny a plaintiff an opportunity to present his facts and theory of recovery.”) (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
Derish v. San Mateo-Burlingame Board Of Realtors
See Clark v. Watchie, 513 F.2d 994, 997 (9th Cir.), (securities law) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 (1975). 15 California has long held that the Sherman Act and the Cartwright Act are similar and that Sherman Act cases apply in construing the Cartwright Act.
cited
Cited "see"
Derish v. San Mateo-Burlingame Board of Realtors
See Clark v. Watchie, 513 F.2d 994, 997 (9th Cir.), (securities law) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth
See Clark v. Watchie, 513 F.2d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , [ 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 ] (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roger v. Town of Watertown, No. Cv 990151963 (Mar. 9, 2000)
See Swift v. McPherson , 232 U.S. 51 , 56 , 34 S.Ct. 239 , 58 L.Ed. 499 (1914) (dismissal is not on merits if dismissed for want of jurisdiction); see also Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes , 317 A.2d 114 , 119 (Del. 1974), judgment based on defective pleadings or lack of jurisdiction in prior action will not serve as bar to second action), aff'd, 336 A.2d 572 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 61 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Linden Condominium Ass'n v. McKenna
Ed. 499 (1914) (dismissal is not on merits if dismissed for want of jurisdiction); see also Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes, 317 A.2d 114, 119 (Del. 1974) (judgment based on defective pleadings or lack of jurisdiction in prior action will not serve as bar to second action), aff'd, 336 A.2d 572 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S. Ct. 72 , 46 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police Department
See also Clark v. Watchie, 513 F.2d 994 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 (1975) (predominance not shown in securities case where separate adjudication is required to determine the substance of oral misrepresentations made to each partner); Spelman v. F & M Bank & Trust Co. [1981-1982 Transfer Binder] Fed.Sec.L.Rep.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kinsey v. NESTOR EXPLORATION LTD.-1981A
See, e.g., Clark v. Watchie, 513 F.2d 994, 997 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Godfrey v. United States
See also United States v. Festa, 513 F.2d 1313 , 1319 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 841 , 96 S.Ct. 72 , 46 L.Ed.2d 60 (1975) (applying clearly erroneous standard).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woodcock
v.
Amaral
v.
Amaral
No. 74-1652.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. Illinois (2)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.